Loading…

Tissue reactions to bacteria-inoculated rat lead samples. II. Effect of local gentamicin release through surface-modified polyurethane tubing

A surface modification technique was developed to achieve controlled release of gentamicin from implanted polyurethane (PU) rat lead samples. PU tubing first was provided with an acrylic acid/acrylamide copolymer surface graft and then loaded with gentamicin. This surface modification technique resu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomedical materials research 1997-05, Vol.35 (2), p.233-247
Main Authors: van Wachem, P. B., van Luyn, M. J. A., de Wit, A. W., Raatjes, D., Hendriks, M., Verhoeven, M. L. P. M., Cahalan, P. T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-6fbc5b6c533032e433e8b182a467f7e1bf0b29f80d35814b25cc7167c58f8d303
container_end_page 247
container_issue 2
container_start_page 233
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research
container_volume 35
creator van Wachem, P. B.
van Luyn, M. J. A.
de Wit, A. W.
Raatjes, D.
Hendriks, M.
Verhoeven, M. L. P. M.
Cahalan, P. T.
description A surface modification technique was developed to achieve controlled release of gentamicin from implanted polyurethane (PU) rat lead samples. PU tubing first was provided with an acrylic acid/acrylamide copolymer surface graft and then loaded with gentamicin. This surface modification technique resulted in release of gentamicin base (GB) and was applied either to the inner luminal surface only (PU‐GB‐1x) or to both the inner and outer surfaces (PU‐GB‐2x). First we investigated whether the early tissue response was harmfully compromised when surface‐modified rat lead samples were implanted without any infectious challenge. Additionally, the efficacy of this type of local gentamicin therapy was investigated by establishing its effect on tissue response and its ability to prevent lead‐related infections after inoculation with Staphylococcus aureus. It was demonstrated that the applied surface modification(s) did not induce adverse effects although an increase in the infiltration of granulocytes and macrophages and an increase in the formation of wound fluid and fibrin were observed. This effect was stronger with PU‐GB‐2x than with PU‐GB‐1x. With bacterial inoculation the applied surface modification successfully suppressed the infectious challenge, PU‐GB‐2x more effectively than PU‐GB‐1x. PU‐GB‐2x also was more effective when compared to the gentamicin‐delivery methods discussed in the first part of this two‐part study, i.e., release through a vicinal gentamicin‐containing collagen sponge and preoperative gentamicin solution‐dipping of rat lead samples. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199705)35:2<233::AID-JBM11>3.0.CO;2-I
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27408212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27408212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-6fbc5b6c533032e433e8b182a467f7e1bf0b29f80d35814b25cc7167c58f8d303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhiMEGmXwE5B8gdB2keCPOE46QNrK2II6esH4uDtyHLs15KPYiaA_gv-MS6vegDSubPm859FrPVH0iuCEYExfnHwoZ-UpwYWI04xlJ6QoBOanjE_pS8rYdHpevonfXdwQ8polOJktzmhc3osmh4370SRwSFwwnD6MHnn_FWNcFIwcRUcFYZwIOol-3VrvR42clmqwfefR0KMq3LWzMrZdr8ZGDrpGTg6o0bJGXrbrRvsElWWCLo3RakC9QU2vZIOWuhtka5XtAjHEvUbDyvXjcoX86IxUOm772hobiOu-2YxODyvZhdRY2W75OHpgZOP1k_15HH18e3k7u47ni6tydj6PVcpyEmemUrzKFGcMM6pTxnRekZzKNBNGaFIZXNHC5LhmPCdpRblSgmRC8dzkddg5jp7vuGvXfx-1H6C1XummCVX60QMVKc4poXcGSYY5Fzn7ryAuSM4OX1Ku995pA2tnW-k2QDBsxQNsxcNWI2w1wk48MA4UgniAIB7-iAcGGGaL8F4G7tN9gbFqdX2g7k2H-bP9XPpgyjjZKesPMZpxwhgJsU-72A_b6M1f3e6o9q9mu4cAjndg6wf98wCW7htkggkOn99fwfw6-3KTigvI2W86ReUk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16050918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tissue reactions to bacteria-inoculated rat lead samples. II. Effect of local gentamicin release through surface-modified polyurethane tubing</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>van Wachem, P. B. ; van Luyn, M. J. A. ; de Wit, A. W. ; Raatjes, D. ; Hendriks, M. ; Verhoeven, M. L. P. M. ; Cahalan, P. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>van Wachem, P. B. ; van Luyn, M. J. A. ; de Wit, A. W. ; Raatjes, D. ; Hendriks, M. ; Verhoeven, M. L. P. M. ; Cahalan, P. T.</creatorcontrib><description>A surface modification technique was developed to achieve controlled release of gentamicin from implanted polyurethane (PU) rat lead samples. PU tubing first was provided with an acrylic acid/acrylamide copolymer surface graft and then loaded with gentamicin. This surface modification technique resulted in release of gentamicin base (GB) and was applied either to the inner luminal surface only (PU‐GB‐1x) or to both the inner and outer surfaces (PU‐GB‐2x). First we investigated whether the early tissue response was harmfully compromised when surface‐modified rat lead samples were implanted without any infectious challenge. Additionally, the efficacy of this type of local gentamicin therapy was investigated by establishing its effect on tissue response and its ability to prevent lead‐related infections after inoculation with Staphylococcus aureus. It was demonstrated that the applied surface modification(s) did not induce adverse effects although an increase in the infiltration of granulocytes and macrophages and an increase in the formation of wound fluid and fibrin were observed. This effect was stronger with PU‐GB‐2x than with PU‐GB‐1x. With bacterial inoculation the applied surface modification successfully suppressed the infectious challenge, PU‐GB‐2x more effectively than PU‐GB‐1x. PU‐GB‐2x also was more effective when compared to the gentamicin‐delivery methods discussed in the first part of this two‐part study, i.e., release through a vicinal gentamicin‐containing collagen sponge and preoperative gentamicin solution‐dipping of rat lead samples. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199705)35:2&lt;233::AID-JBM11&gt;3.0.CO;2-I</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9135172</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBMRBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Drug Implants ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Gentamicins - administration &amp; dosage ; Gentamicins - adverse effects ; Gentamicins - therapeutic use ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Muscle, Skeletal - pathology ; Polyurethanes ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Rats ; Skin - pathology ; Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology ; Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Surface Properties ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research, 1997-05, Vol.35 (2), p.233-247</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-6fbc5b6c533032e433e8b182a467f7e1bf0b29f80d35814b25cc7167c58f8d303</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2651331$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9135172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Wachem, P. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Luyn, M. J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Wit, A. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raatjes, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, M. L. P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahalan, P. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Tissue reactions to bacteria-inoculated rat lead samples. II. Effect of local gentamicin release through surface-modified polyurethane tubing</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>A surface modification technique was developed to achieve controlled release of gentamicin from implanted polyurethane (PU) rat lead samples. PU tubing first was provided with an acrylic acid/acrylamide copolymer surface graft and then loaded with gentamicin. This surface modification technique resulted in release of gentamicin base (GB) and was applied either to the inner luminal surface only (PU‐GB‐1x) or to both the inner and outer surfaces (PU‐GB‐2x). First we investigated whether the early tissue response was harmfully compromised when surface‐modified rat lead samples were implanted without any infectious challenge. Additionally, the efficacy of this type of local gentamicin therapy was investigated by establishing its effect on tissue response and its ability to prevent lead‐related infections after inoculation with Staphylococcus aureus. It was demonstrated that the applied surface modification(s) did not induce adverse effects although an increase in the infiltration of granulocytes and macrophages and an increase in the formation of wound fluid and fibrin were observed. This effect was stronger with PU‐GB‐2x than with PU‐GB‐1x. With bacterial inoculation the applied surface modification successfully suppressed the infectious challenge, PU‐GB‐2x more effectively than PU‐GB‐1x. PU‐GB‐2x also was more effective when compared to the gentamicin‐delivery methods discussed in the first part of this two‐part study, i.e., release through a vicinal gentamicin‐containing collagen sponge and preoperative gentamicin solution‐dipping of rat lead samples. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Drug Implants</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Gentamicins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Gentamicins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gentamicins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - pathology</subject><subject>Polyurethanes</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Skin - pathology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><issn>0021-9304</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV1v0zAUhiMEGmXwE5B8gdB2keCPOE46QNrK2II6esH4uDtyHLs15KPYiaA_gv-MS6vegDSubPm859FrPVH0iuCEYExfnHwoZ-UpwYWI04xlJ6QoBOanjE_pS8rYdHpevonfXdwQ8polOJktzmhc3osmh4370SRwSFwwnD6MHnn_FWNcFIwcRUcFYZwIOol-3VrvR42clmqwfefR0KMq3LWzMrZdr8ZGDrpGTg6o0bJGXrbrRvsElWWCLo3RakC9QU2vZIOWuhtka5XtAjHEvUbDyvXjcoX86IxUOm772hobiOu-2YxODyvZhdRY2W75OHpgZOP1k_15HH18e3k7u47ni6tydj6PVcpyEmemUrzKFGcMM6pTxnRekZzKNBNGaFIZXNHC5LhmPCdpRblSgmRC8dzkddg5jp7vuGvXfx-1H6C1XummCVX60QMVKc4poXcGSYY5Fzn7ryAuSM4OX1Ku995pA2tnW-k2QDBsxQNsxcNWI2w1wk48MA4UgniAIB7-iAcGGGaL8F4G7tN9gbFqdX2g7k2H-bP9XPpgyjjZKesPMZpxwhgJsU-72A_b6M1f3e6o9q9mu4cAjndg6wf98wCW7htkggkOn99fwfw6-3KTigvI2W86ReUk</recordid><startdate>199705</startdate><enddate>199705</enddate><creator>van Wachem, P. B.</creator><creator>van Luyn, M. J. A.</creator><creator>de Wit, A. W.</creator><creator>Raatjes, D.</creator><creator>Hendriks, M.</creator><creator>Verhoeven, M. L. P. M.</creator><creator>Cahalan, P. T.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199705</creationdate><title>Tissue reactions to bacteria-inoculated rat lead samples. II. Effect of local gentamicin release through surface-modified polyurethane tubing</title><author>van Wachem, P. B. ; van Luyn, M. J. A. ; de Wit, A. W. ; Raatjes, D. ; Hendriks, M. ; Verhoeven, M. L. P. M. ; Cahalan, P. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-6fbc5b6c533032e433e8b182a467f7e1bf0b29f80d35814b25cc7167c58f8d303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Drug Implants</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Gentamicins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Gentamicins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gentamicins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - pathology</topic><topic>Polyurethanes</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Skin - pathology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Wachem, P. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Luyn, M. J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Wit, A. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raatjes, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeven, M. L. P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahalan, P. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Wachem, P. B.</au><au>van Luyn, M. J. A.</au><au>de Wit, A. W.</au><au>Raatjes, D.</au><au>Hendriks, M.</au><au>Verhoeven, M. L. P. M.</au><au>Cahalan, P. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tissue reactions to bacteria-inoculated rat lead samples. II. Effect of local gentamicin release through surface-modified polyurethane tubing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>1997-05</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>233-247</pages><issn>0021-9304</issn><eissn>1097-4636</eissn><coden>JBMRBG</coden><abstract>A surface modification technique was developed to achieve controlled release of gentamicin from implanted polyurethane (PU) rat lead samples. PU tubing first was provided with an acrylic acid/acrylamide copolymer surface graft and then loaded with gentamicin. This surface modification technique resulted in release of gentamicin base (GB) and was applied either to the inner luminal surface only (PU‐GB‐1x) or to both the inner and outer surfaces (PU‐GB‐2x). First we investigated whether the early tissue response was harmfully compromised when surface‐modified rat lead samples were implanted without any infectious challenge. Additionally, the efficacy of this type of local gentamicin therapy was investigated by establishing its effect on tissue response and its ability to prevent lead‐related infections after inoculation with Staphylococcus aureus. It was demonstrated that the applied surface modification(s) did not induce adverse effects although an increase in the infiltration of granulocytes and macrophages and an increase in the formation of wound fluid and fibrin were observed. This effect was stronger with PU‐GB‐2x than with PU‐GB‐1x. With bacterial inoculation the applied surface modification successfully suppressed the infectious challenge, PU‐GB‐2x more effectively than PU‐GB‐1x. PU‐GB‐2x also was more effective when compared to the gentamicin‐delivery methods discussed in the first part of this two‐part study, i.e., release through a vicinal gentamicin‐containing collagen sponge and preoperative gentamicin solution‐dipping of rat lead samples. © 1997 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>9135172</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199705)35:2&lt;233::AID-JBM11&gt;3.0.CO;2-I</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9304
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research, 1997-05, Vol.35 (2), p.233-247
issn 0021-9304
1097-4636
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27408212
source Wiley
subjects Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Drug Implants
Electrodes, Implanted
Gentamicins - administration & dosage
Gentamicins - adverse effects
Gentamicins - therapeutic use
Male
Medical sciences
Muscle, Skeletal - pathology
Polyurethanes
Prosthesis-Related Infections - pathology
Prosthesis-Related Infections - prevention & control
Rats
Skin - pathology
Staphylococcal Infections - microbiology
Staphylococcal Infections - prevention & control
Surface Properties
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments
title Tissue reactions to bacteria-inoculated rat lead samples. II. Effect of local gentamicin release through surface-modified polyurethane tubing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A46%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tissue%20reactions%20to%20bacteria-inoculated%20rat%20lead%20samples.%20II.%20Effect%20of%20local%20gentamicin%20release%20through%20surface-modified%20polyurethane%20tubing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research&rft.au=van%20Wachem,%20P.%20B.&rft.date=1997-05&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=233-247&rft.issn=0021-9304&rft.eissn=1097-4636&rft.coden=JBMRBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199705)35:2%3C233::AID-JBM11%3E3.0.CO;2-I&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27408212%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4381-6fbc5b6c533032e433e8b182a467f7e1bf0b29f80d35814b25cc7167c58f8d303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16050918&rft_id=info:pmid/9135172&rfr_iscdi=true