Conservative Non-surgical Options for Erectile Dysfunction

• Published in: Current urology reports 2023-02, Vol.24 (2), p.75-104
• Main Authors: Alonso-Isa, Manuel, García-Gómez, Borja, González-Ginel, Ignacio, García-Rayo-Encina, Clara, del Prado Caro-González, María, Medina-Polo, José, García-Rojo, Esther, Romero-Otero, Javier
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Conservative Treatment; Erectile Dysfunction - therapy; Humans; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Men’s Health (R Carrion; Nephrology; Section Editor; Topical Collection on Men’s Health; Urology
• ISSN: 1527-2737; 1534-6285
• DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01137-2

Purpose of Review This study aimed to review recent evidence on conservative non-surgical options for erectile dysfunction (ED) in men. A narrative review of the literature was performed. A comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was done. Papers in English language, published from May 2017 until May 2022, were included. Papers reporting basic research or animal research were excluded, as long as reviews or meta-analyses. Congress reports, clinical cases, or clinical trials protocols with no results were also excluded. Recent Findings We found a multitude of different treatment modalities for ED. We must take into account the type of patient, their comorbidities, the origin of their ED, and its severity in order to reproduce effective results using these therapies. Some of the treatments show good results with a good level of evidence (new IPDE5 formulations, intracavernous injections, shock wave therapy, hormonal theraphy, psycho-sexual theraphy). However, others (some new molecules, stem cell theraphy, platelet-rich plasma injections, oxygenation-based therapy, nutraceuticals), although some of them present promising results, require randomized studies with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up time to be able to establish firm recommendations. Summary Regarding the conservative treatment of erectile dysfunction, in recent years, some therapies have been consolidated as effective and safe for certain types of patients. On the other hand, other treatment modalities, although promising, still lack the evidence and the necessary follow-up to be recommended in daily practice.