Loading…
Comparative Study of Durability Indices for Clay Bricks
The potential durability of clay bricks is generally assessed using specifications and test methods mentioned in respective national standards. The current American and Canadian standards for the evaluation of brick durability have, in certain cases, been criticized by researchers as time consuming,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of architectural engineering 1998-03, Vol.4 (1), p.26-33 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-c438cfb8ed9520bd786507e7efcfec20440e264347c3046301c42cf2113041053 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-c438cfb8ed9520bd786507e7efcfec20440e264347c3046301c42cf2113041053 |
container_end_page | 33 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | Journal of architectural engineering |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Koroth, Surej R Fazio, Paul Feldman, Dorel |
description | The potential durability of clay bricks is generally assessed using specifications and test methods mentioned in respective national standards. The current American and Canadian standards for the evaluation of brick durability have, in certain cases, been criticized by researchers as time consuming, unrealistic, and inadequate. These standards cannot be used for comparing the performance level of the bricks. The use of an index for evaluating durability has advantages in that it can be used for comparing brick types and also it will facilitate the designers to specify it as a construction requirement for selecting the proper type of brick. The different durability indices for bricks developed by various researchers are reviewed in this paper. An experimental work carried out to study and compare the performance of these indices is also discussed. The results from the study showed that the existing indices have limitations in assessing durability and that there is a need for a new durability index by taking into account the pore size distribution as well as the water absorption characteristics of bricks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:1(26) |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27461308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27461308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-c438cfb8ed9520bd786507e7efcfec20440e264347c3046301c42cf2113041053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwHzJUqB0CPtuxU5hKGqCoEkNhtlzHllLSpNgJUv49Cf0Y8XA-S4_v1T0IjQDfAeZwP56tknQCWPAQMwpjmE7jCXuAMeGTMzSAKaNhFPH4vOuP0CW68n6DMY65oAMkkmq7U07V-Y8JVnWTtUFlg3nj1Dov8roNFmWWa-MDW7kgKVQbPLlcf_lrdGFV4c3N4R6iz-f0I3kNl-8vi2S2DBWNoQ41o7G269hk04jgdSZiHmFhhLHaGk0wY9gQzigTmmLGKQbNiLYEoHsCjugQ3e7n7lz13Rhfy23utSkKVZqq8ZIIxjs27sDHPahd5b0zVu5cvlWulYBlb0vK3pbsRchehOxtSSZBEt79Hh1ilNeqsE6VOvenEQQE6TLoacuOMnJTNa7slpdvs3SRznF_2F-FvhC-74_5_8T_Aq-Tf7o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27461308</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of Durability Indices for Clay Bricks</title><source>American Society Of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Journals</source><source>Art & Architecture Source</source><creator>Koroth, Surej R ; Fazio, Paul ; Feldman, Dorel</creator><creatorcontrib>Koroth, Surej R ; Fazio, Paul ; Feldman, Dorel</creatorcontrib><description>The potential durability of clay bricks is generally assessed using specifications and test methods mentioned in respective national standards. The current American and Canadian standards for the evaluation of brick durability have, in certain cases, been criticized by researchers as time consuming, unrealistic, and inadequate. These standards cannot be used for comparing the performance level of the bricks. The use of an index for evaluating durability has advantages in that it can be used for comparing brick types and also it will facilitate the designers to specify it as a construction requirement for selecting the proper type of brick. The different durability indices for bricks developed by various researchers are reviewed in this paper. An experimental work carried out to study and compare the performance of these indices is also discussed. The results from the study showed that the existing indices have limitations in assessing durability and that there is a need for a new durability index by taking into account the pore size distribution as well as the water absorption characteristics of bricks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-0431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:1(26)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAEIED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Ceramic. Refractories. Terra cotta ; Exact sciences and technology ; Materials ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of architectural engineering, 1998-03, Vol.4 (1), p.26-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-c438cfb8ed9520bd786507e7efcfec20440e264347c3046301c42cf2113041053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-c438cfb8ed9520bd786507e7efcfec20440e264347c3046301c42cf2113041053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:1(26)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:1(26)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2172083$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koroth, Surej R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazio, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Dorel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Durability Indices for Clay Bricks</title><title>Journal of architectural engineering</title><description>The potential durability of clay bricks is generally assessed using specifications and test methods mentioned in respective national standards. The current American and Canadian standards for the evaluation of brick durability have, in certain cases, been criticized by researchers as time consuming, unrealistic, and inadequate. These standards cannot be used for comparing the performance level of the bricks. The use of an index for evaluating durability has advantages in that it can be used for comparing brick types and also it will facilitate the designers to specify it as a construction requirement for selecting the proper type of brick. The different durability indices for bricks developed by various researchers are reviewed in this paper. An experimental work carried out to study and compare the performance of these indices is also discussed. The results from the study showed that the existing indices have limitations in assessing durability and that there is a need for a new durability index by taking into account the pore size distribution as well as the water absorption characteristics of bricks.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Ceramic. Refractories. Terra cotta</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>1076-0431</issn><issn>1943-5568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwHzJUqB0CPtuxU5hKGqCoEkNhtlzHllLSpNgJUv49Cf0Y8XA-S4_v1T0IjQDfAeZwP56tknQCWPAQMwpjmE7jCXuAMeGTMzSAKaNhFPH4vOuP0CW68n6DMY65oAMkkmq7U07V-Y8JVnWTtUFlg3nj1Dov8roNFmWWa-MDW7kgKVQbPLlcf_lrdGFV4c3N4R6iz-f0I3kNl-8vi2S2DBWNoQ41o7G269hk04jgdSZiHmFhhLHaGk0wY9gQzigTmmLGKQbNiLYEoHsCjugQ3e7n7lz13Rhfy23utSkKVZqq8ZIIxjs27sDHPahd5b0zVu5cvlWulYBlb0vK3pbsRchehOxtSSZBEt79Hh1ilNeqsE6VOvenEQQE6TLoacuOMnJTNa7slpdvs3SRznF_2F-FvhC-74_5_8T_Aq-Tf7o</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>Koroth, Surej R</creator><creator>Fazio, Paul</creator><creator>Feldman, Dorel</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Durability Indices for Clay Bricks</title><author>Koroth, Surej R ; Fazio, Paul ; Feldman, Dorel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-c438cfb8ed9520bd786507e7efcfec20440e264347c3046301c42cf2113041053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Ceramic. Refractories. Terra cotta</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koroth, Surej R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazio, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Dorel</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of architectural engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koroth, Surej R</au><au>Fazio, Paul</au><au>Feldman, Dorel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Durability Indices for Clay Bricks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of architectural engineering</jtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>26-33</pages><issn>1076-0431</issn><eissn>1943-5568</eissn><coden>JAEIED</coden><abstract>The potential durability of clay bricks is generally assessed using specifications and test methods mentioned in respective national standards. The current American and Canadian standards for the evaluation of brick durability have, in certain cases, been criticized by researchers as time consuming, unrealistic, and inadequate. These standards cannot be used for comparing the performance level of the bricks. The use of an index for evaluating durability has advantages in that it can be used for comparing brick types and also it will facilitate the designers to specify it as a construction requirement for selecting the proper type of brick. The different durability indices for bricks developed by various researchers are reviewed in this paper. An experimental work carried out to study and compare the performance of these indices is also discussed. The results from the study showed that the existing indices have limitations in assessing durability and that there is a need for a new durability index by taking into account the pore size distribution as well as the water absorption characteristics of bricks.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:1(26)</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-0431 |
ispartof | Journal of architectural engineering, 1998-03, Vol.4 (1), p.26-33 |
issn | 1076-0431 1943-5568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27461308 |
source | American Society Of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Journals; Art & Architecture Source |
subjects | Applied sciences Buildings. Public works Ceramic. Refractories. Terra cotta Exact sciences and technology Materials TECHNICAL PAPERS |
title | Comparative Study of Durability Indices for Clay Bricks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Durability%20Indices%20for%20Clay%20Bricks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20architectural%20engineering&rft.au=Koroth,%20Surej%20R&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=26-33&rft.issn=1076-0431&rft.eissn=1943-5568&rft.coden=JAEIED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1998)4:1(26)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27461308%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-c438cfb8ed9520bd786507e7efcfec20440e264347c3046301c42cf2113041053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27461308&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |