Editor's Choice – Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms: A Delphi Consensus Document on Terminology, Definition, Classification, Diagnosis, and Reporting Standards

• Published in: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2023-03, Vol.65 (3), p.323-329
• Main Authors: Sörelius, Karl, Wyss, Thomas R., Adam, Donald, Beck, Adam W., Berard, Xavier, Budtz-Lilly, Jacob, Chakfé, Nabil, Clough, Rachel, Czerny, Martin, D’Oria, Mario, Dang, Michael, di Summa, Pietro G., Eldrup, Nikolaj, Fourneau, Inge, Heinola, Ivika, Hosaka, Akihiro, Hsu, Ron-Bin, Huang, Yao-Kuang, Jutidamrongphan, Warissara, Kan, Chung-Dann, Kölbel, Tilo, Lau, Christopher, Lawaetz, Martin, Mani, Kevin, Moulakakis, Konstantinos, Oderich, Gustavo S., Resch, Timothy, Schmidli, Jürg, Sedivy, Petr, Shirasu, Takuro, Suwannanon, Ruedeekorn, Szeberin, Zoltan, Touma, Joseph, van den Berg, Jos C., Veger, Hugo, Wanhainen, Anders, Weiss, Salome
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Classification; Criteria; Definition; Diagnosis; Infective native aortic aneurysm; Mycotic aneurysm
• ISSN: 1078-5884; 1532-2165
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.11.024

There is no consensus regarding the terminology, definition, classification, diagnostic criteria, and algorithm, or reporting standards for the disease of infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA), previously known as mycotic aneurysm. The aim of this study was to establish this by performing a consensus study. The Delphi methodology was used. Thirty-seven international experts were invited via mail to participate. Four two week Delphi rounds were performed, using an online questionnaire, initially with 22 statements and nine reporting items. The panellists rated the statements on a five point Likert scale. Comments on statements were analysed, statements revised, and results presented in iterative rounds. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% of the panel selecting “strongly agree” or “agree” on the Likert scale, and consensus on the final assessment was defined as Cronbach’s alpha coefficient > .80. All 38 panellists completed all four rounds, resulting in 100% participation and agreement that this study was necessary, and the term INAA was agreed to be optimal. Three more statements were added based on the results and comments of the panel, resulting in a final 25 statements and nine reporting items. All 25 statements reached an agreement of ≥ 87%, and all nine reporting items reached an agreement of 100%. The Cronbach’s alpha increased for each consecutive round (round 1 = .84, round 2 = .87, round 3 = .90, and round 4 = .92). Thus, consensus was reached for all statements and reporting items. This Delphi study established the first consensus document on INAA regarding terminology, definition, classification, diagnostic criteria, and algorithm, as well as reporting standards. The results of this study create essential conditions for scientific research on this disease. The presented consensus will need future amendments in accordance with newly acquired knowledge.