Loading…

Flash-flood and bedload dynamics of desert gravel-bed streams

Comparatively little is known about the hydrology of desert flash‐floods despite the extent of the world's drylands. There is even less known about their sedimentary behaviour and particularly about the movement of coarse material as bedload. The results of an intense field monitoring programme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological processes 1998-03, Vol.12 (4), p.543-557
Main Authors: Reid, Ian, Laronne, Jonathan B., Powell, D. Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4693-7e1c6078580bf43febad1ddb37db661370acf6f94b956ffebc33b03cd6dc3ac83
container_end_page 557
container_issue 4
container_start_page 543
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 12
creator Reid, Ian
Laronne, Jonathan B.
Powell, D. Mark
description Comparatively little is known about the hydrology of desert flash‐floods despite the extent of the world's drylands. There is even less known about their sedimentary behaviour and particularly about the movement of coarse material as bedload. The results of an intense field monitoring programme carried out on an ephemeral gravel‐bed stream in the northern Negev Desert are presented. In this semi‐arid setting, flow duration analysis indicates that the channel is hydrologically active for 2% of the time, or about seven days per year, and that overbank flow can be expected for only 0·03% of the time—about three hours per year. Multipeaked flood hydrographs are the norm, reflecting many factors including the arrival of separate slugs of discharge from contributing subcatchments. The passage of the initial flood bore is surprisingly slow, but the rising limb of the flood hydrograph is rapid with a median time of rise of 10 minutes, in keeping with expected flash‐flood behaviour. Bedload flux is high, averaging 2·67 kg s−1 m−1 during the period that the channel carries flow. This gives very high bedload sediment yield despite the infrequent and short duration of flood flows and matches the high yield of suspended sediment. The relationship between bedload flux and boundary shear stress is simple, in contrast with perennial gravel‐bed streams, and the exponent of the log–log relationship is 1·52. Of great value is that the behaviour of the Nahal Eshtemoa corroborates a pattern established by the authors previously in a smaller tributary stream. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19980330)12:4<543::AID-HYP593>3.0.CO;2-C
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27526910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>308217021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4693-7e1c6078580bf43febad1ddb37db661370acf6f94b956ffebc33b03cd6dc3ac83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFtv0zAUgCMEEmXwH_KA0Pbg7tiOHbtcxJTRrtJEKy7i8nLk-AIZabPZHdB_T6qUvoC0J0v25-8cfVn2msKYArDT4_fzan5CQWtCQYljqrUCzuGEsknxQhR8Mjmbn5OLL0uh-Ss-hnG1eM5IdS8bHT7dz0aglCASVPkwe5TSFQAUoGCUvZy2Jn0noe06l5u1y2vv2s643G3XZtXYlHchdz75uMm_RfPTt6Qn8rSJ3qzS4-xBMG3yT_bnUfZx-uZDdUEuF7N5dXZJTCE1J6WnVkKphII6FDz42jjqXM1LV0tJeQnGBhl0UWshQ_9sOa-BWyed5cYqfpQ9G7zXsbu59WmDqyZZ37Zm7bvbhKwUTGoKd4JUCsYFL3rw8wDa2KUUfcDr2KxM3CIF3IVH3IXHXUPcNcS_4ZEyLLAPj9iHxyE8cgSsFsiw6tVP9zuYZE0bolnbJh38jCpVatZjXwfsV9P67T_j75z-3-H7m15OBnmTNv73QW7iD5QlLwV-ejtDqc-XU3i3xBn_A9-VsrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16523534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flash-flood and bedload dynamics of desert gravel-bed streams</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Reid, Ian ; Laronne, Jonathan B. ; Powell, D. Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Reid, Ian ; Laronne, Jonathan B. ; Powell, D. Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Comparatively little is known about the hydrology of desert flash‐floods despite the extent of the world's drylands. There is even less known about their sedimentary behaviour and particularly about the movement of coarse material as bedload. The results of an intense field monitoring programme carried out on an ephemeral gravel‐bed stream in the northern Negev Desert are presented. In this semi‐arid setting, flow duration analysis indicates that the channel is hydrologically active for 2% of the time, or about seven days per year, and that overbank flow can be expected for only 0·03% of the time—about three hours per year. Multipeaked flood hydrographs are the norm, reflecting many factors including the arrival of separate slugs of discharge from contributing subcatchments. The passage of the initial flood bore is surprisingly slow, but the rising limb of the flood hydrograph is rapid with a median time of rise of 10 minutes, in keeping with expected flash‐flood behaviour. Bedload flux is high, averaging 2·67 kg s−1 m−1 during the period that the channel carries flow. This gives very high bedload sediment yield despite the infrequent and short duration of flood flows and matches the high yield of suspended sediment. The relationship between bedload flux and boundary shear stress is simple, in contrast with perennial gravel‐bed streams, and the exponent of the log–log relationship is 1·52. Of great value is that the behaviour of the Nahal Eshtemoa corroborates a pattern established by the authors previously in a smaller tributary stream. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19980330)12:4&lt;543::AID-HYP593&gt;3.0.CO;2-C</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYPRE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>West Sussex: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>arid-zone ; bedload sediment ; Boundaries ; Coarsening ; Deserts ; Discharge ; Dynamics ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; flash-flood ; Floods ; Flux ; Freshwater ; gravel-bed stream ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Monitoring ; sediment yield ; Sediments ; Shear stress ; Streams</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 1998-03, Vol.12 (4), p.543-557</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4693-7e1c6078580bf43febad1ddb37db661370acf6f94b956ffebc33b03cd6dc3ac83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2188792$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reid, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laronne, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, D. Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Flash-flood and bedload dynamics of desert gravel-bed streams</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Comparatively little is known about the hydrology of desert flash‐floods despite the extent of the world's drylands. There is even less known about their sedimentary behaviour and particularly about the movement of coarse material as bedload. The results of an intense field monitoring programme carried out on an ephemeral gravel‐bed stream in the northern Negev Desert are presented. In this semi‐arid setting, flow duration analysis indicates that the channel is hydrologically active for 2% of the time, or about seven days per year, and that overbank flow can be expected for only 0·03% of the time—about three hours per year. Multipeaked flood hydrographs are the norm, reflecting many factors including the arrival of separate slugs of discharge from contributing subcatchments. The passage of the initial flood bore is surprisingly slow, but the rising limb of the flood hydrograph is rapid with a median time of rise of 10 minutes, in keeping with expected flash‐flood behaviour. Bedload flux is high, averaging 2·67 kg s−1 m−1 during the period that the channel carries flow. This gives very high bedload sediment yield despite the infrequent and short duration of flood flows and matches the high yield of suspended sediment. The relationship between bedload flux and boundary shear stress is simple, in contrast with perennial gravel‐bed streams, and the exponent of the log–log relationship is 1·52. Of great value is that the behaviour of the Nahal Eshtemoa corroborates a pattern established by the authors previously in a smaller tributary stream. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>arid-zone</subject><subject>bedload sediment</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Coarsening</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>flash-flood</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>gravel-bed stream</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>sediment yield</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Streams</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFtv0zAUgCMEEmXwH_KA0Pbg7tiOHbtcxJTRrtJEKy7i8nLk-AIZabPZHdB_T6qUvoC0J0v25-8cfVn2msKYArDT4_fzan5CQWtCQYljqrUCzuGEsknxQhR8Mjmbn5OLL0uh-Ss-hnG1eM5IdS8bHT7dz0aglCASVPkwe5TSFQAUoGCUvZy2Jn0noe06l5u1y2vv2s643G3XZtXYlHchdz75uMm_RfPTt6Qn8rSJ3qzS4-xBMG3yT_bnUfZx-uZDdUEuF7N5dXZJTCE1J6WnVkKphII6FDz42jjqXM1LV0tJeQnGBhl0UWshQ_9sOa-BWyed5cYqfpQ9G7zXsbu59WmDqyZZ37Zm7bvbhKwUTGoKd4JUCsYFL3rw8wDa2KUUfcDr2KxM3CIF3IVH3IXHXUPcNcS_4ZEyLLAPj9iHxyE8cgSsFsiw6tVP9zuYZE0bolnbJh38jCpVatZjXwfsV9P67T_j75z-3-H7m15OBnmTNv73QW7iD5QlLwV-ejtDqc-XU3i3xBn_A9-VsrA</recordid><startdate>19980330</startdate><enddate>19980330</enddate><creator>Reid, Ian</creator><creator>Laronne, Jonathan B.</creator><creator>Powell, D. Mark</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980330</creationdate><title>Flash-flood and bedload dynamics of desert gravel-bed streams</title><author>Reid, Ian ; Laronne, Jonathan B. ; Powell, D. Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4693-7e1c6078580bf43febad1ddb37db661370acf6f94b956ffebc33b03cd6dc3ac83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>arid-zone</topic><topic>bedload sediment</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Coarsening</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>flash-flood</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>gravel-bed stream</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>sediment yield</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Streams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reid, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laronne, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, D. Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reid, Ian</au><au>Laronne, Jonathan B.</au><au>Powell, D. Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flash-flood and bedload dynamics of desert gravel-bed streams</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>1998-03-30</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>543-557</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><coden>HYPRE3</coden><abstract>Comparatively little is known about the hydrology of desert flash‐floods despite the extent of the world's drylands. There is even less known about their sedimentary behaviour and particularly about the movement of coarse material as bedload. The results of an intense field monitoring programme carried out on an ephemeral gravel‐bed stream in the northern Negev Desert are presented. In this semi‐arid setting, flow duration analysis indicates that the channel is hydrologically active for 2% of the time, or about seven days per year, and that overbank flow can be expected for only 0·03% of the time—about three hours per year. Multipeaked flood hydrographs are the norm, reflecting many factors including the arrival of separate slugs of discharge from contributing subcatchments. The passage of the initial flood bore is surprisingly slow, but the rising limb of the flood hydrograph is rapid with a median time of rise of 10 minutes, in keeping with expected flash‐flood behaviour. Bedload flux is high, averaging 2·67 kg s−1 m−1 during the period that the channel carries flow. This gives very high bedload sediment yield despite the infrequent and short duration of flood flows and matches the high yield of suspended sediment. The relationship between bedload flux and boundary shear stress is simple, in contrast with perennial gravel‐bed streams, and the exponent of the log–log relationship is 1·52. Of great value is that the behaviour of the Nahal Eshtemoa corroborates a pattern established by the authors previously in a smaller tributary stream. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>West Sussex</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19980330)12:4&lt;543::AID-HYP593&gt;3.0.CO;2-C</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 1998-03, Vol.12 (4), p.543-557
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27526910
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects arid-zone
bedload sediment
Boundaries
Coarsening
Deserts
Discharge
Dynamics
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
flash-flood
Floods
Flux
Freshwater
gravel-bed stream
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Monitoring
sediment yield
Sediments
Shear stress
Streams
title Flash-flood and bedload dynamics of desert gravel-bed streams
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flash-flood%20and%20bedload%20dynamics%20of%20desert%20gravel-bed%20streams&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Reid,%20Ian&rft.date=1998-03-30&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=543-557&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft.coden=HYPRE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19980330)12:4%3C543::AID-HYP593%3E3.0.CO;2-C&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E308217021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4693-7e1c6078580bf43febad1ddb37db661370acf6f94b956ffebc33b03cd6dc3ac83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16523534&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true