The impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for video-assisted and robotic-assisted lobectomy on surgical outcomes and costs: a retrospective single-center cohort study

• Published in: Journal of robotic surgery 2023-06, Vol.17 (3), p.1039-1048
• Main Authors: Han, Shiwei, Du, Simo, Jander, Christina, Kuppusamy, Madhan, Sternbach, Joel, Low, Donald E., Hubka, Michal
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Chest tubes; Cohort Studies; Cost analysis; Cost control; Diet; Disease prevention; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery; Female; Humans; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Minimally Invasive Surgery; Multivariate analysis; Original Article; Ostomy; Patients; Pneumonectomy; Recovery; Recovery (Medical); Retrospective Studies; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods; Robotics; Smoking; Surgery; Surgical outcomes; Thoracic surgery; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Urology
• ISSN: 1863-2491; 1863-2483; 1863-2491
• DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01487-6

To determine the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway implementation on outcomes and cost of robotic- and video-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS and VATS) lobectomy. Retrospective review of 116 consecutive VATS and RATS lobectomies in the pre-ERAS (Oct 2018–Sep 2019) and ERAS (Oct 2019–Sep 2020) period. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the impact of ERAS and operative approach alone, and in combination, on length of hospital stay (LOS) and overall cost. Operative approach was 49.1% VATS, 50.9% RATS, with 44.8% pre-ERAS, and 55.2% ERAS (median age 68, 65.5% female). ERAS patients had shorter LOS (2.22 vs 3.45 days) and decreased total cost ($15,022 vs $20,155) compared with non-ERAS patients, while RATS was associated with decreased LOS (2.16 vs 4.19 days) and decreased total cost ($14,729 vs $20,484) compared with VATS. The combination of ERAS + RATS showed the shortest LOS and the lowest total cost (1.35 days and $13,588, P