Effectiveness of couple-based interventions for prostate cancer patients and their spouses on their quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Supportive care in cancer 2023-01, Vol.31 (1), p.34-34, Article 34
• Main Authors: Chen, Wei, Li, Hui, Qin, Nan, Zhou, Jie, Ou-Yang, Jie, Wang, Kai-Yue
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Cancer patients; Care and treatment; Couples; Developing countries; Humans; Male; Married people; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mental Health; Meta-analysis; Nursing; Nursing Research; Oncology; Pain Medicine; Patients; Prostate cancer; Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy; Quality of Life; Rehabilitation Medicine; Review Article; Spouses - psychology; Systematic review
• ISSN: 0941-4355; 1433-7339
• DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07532-2

Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effect of couple-based interventions on quality of life (QOL) among prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Method Six English databases and two Chinese databases were systematically searched to identify relevant RCTs that examined the effect of couple-based interventions on QOL. The data from the included studies were extracted by two independent reviewers using a standardized data extraction form. Methodological quality was assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis was conducted among the suitable studies that the available data were sufficient. Results One thousand ninety-five studies were identified, and 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis and 7 studied for meta-analysis. Couple-based interventions involve different formats of physical and psychosocial interventions. Physical exercise-based interventions were popular among couples, and these interventions had the highest level of adherence among all interventions examined herein. However, the meta-analysis of total QOL and physical and mental health revealed a non-significant effect on both prostate cancer patients and their spouses. More RCTs examining couple-based interventions may be needed in developing countries, especially in Asian countries. Conclusion Couple-based interventions had non-significant effect on improving the total QOL and physical and mental health of prostate cancer patients and their spouses. However, the current evidence is limited because the sample size of the studies is small. Thus, more studies with large sample sizes need to be included to detect the efficacy of couple-based interventions on prostate cancer patients and their spouses.