Loading…

The dynamic postural steadiness and stabilization time between older adults with and without recurrent low back pain

Although postural control measures were reported to identify neuromuscular impairments, postural steadiness and stabilization time were not carefully investigated between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain (LBP). Research QuestionAre there group differences in the stabilization time,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gait & posture 2023-02, Vol.100, p.114-119
Main Authors: Sung, Paul S., Lee, Dongchul, Hosmer, Emily
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-254ec22bb3f3e1d6b0ef613f13be9a4d0d1e72a1212aa6abd0dc7cac2c4a85ff3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-254ec22bb3f3e1d6b0ef613f13be9a4d0d1e72a1212aa6abd0dc7cac2c4a85ff3
container_end_page 119
container_issue
container_start_page 114
container_title Gait & posture
container_volume 100
creator Sung, Paul S.
Lee, Dongchul
Hosmer, Emily
description Although postural control measures were reported to identify neuromuscular impairments, postural steadiness and stabilization time were not carefully investigated between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain (LBP). Research QuestionAre there group differences in the stabilization time, direction of sway, and dynamic postural steadiness index (DPSI) during one-leg standing? Thirty-four control subjects and 29 subjects with recurrent LBP participated in the study. Each subject stood upright on a single leg with and without visual input. The outcomes were measured for standing duration (sec), direction of sway, and the DPSI, which included the vertical steadiness index (VSI). The VSI assesses fluctuations to standardize the vertical ground reaction forces on the force plate. The control group demonstrated significantly longer standing duration compared to the LBP group during the eyes-open condition (t = 3.55, p = 0.001). The LBP group demonstrated significantly faster stabilization time (t = 2.53, p = 0.01) in the sagittal plane. The DPSI demonstrated an excellent relationship with the VSI without visual input in the control group (r = 0.98, p = 0.001). The directions of sway demonstrated a significant interaction between groups (F = 9.29, p = 0.004). Although standing duration in the eyes-open condition decreased in the LBP group, a faster stabilization time in the sagittal plane was evident compared to the control group to adapt postural stability. These results indicated that vertical dynamic steadiness with visual input might be important to enhance compensatory postural control. •The low back pain group demonstrated faster stabilization in the sagittal plane.•The groups demonstrated a significant interaction with sway directions.•Vertical standing steadiness was enhanced with a longer standing duration.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.12.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2754860990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636222007202</els_id><sourcerecordid>2754860990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-254ec22bb3f3e1d6b0ef613f13be9a4d0d1e72a1212aa6abd0dc7cac2c4a85ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtP3DAUha0KVAboX0BedpPgR-JJdiAEBQmpG1hb1_YNeJrYU9vpiP76ZjrQbVf3oXPu0f0IueCs5oyry039Ar5sYy61YELUXNSM8U9kxbt1XwnB-yOyYr1SlZJKnJDTnDeMsUZ24jM5karlSjXtipSnV6TuLcDkLd2fmxOMNBcE5wPmTCG4ZQTjR_8bio-BFj8hNVh2iIHG0WGi4OaxZLrz5fWvYd_EudCEdk4JQ6Fj3FED9gfdgg_n5HiAMeOX93pGnu9un27uq8fv3x5urh8rK1VXKtE2aIUwRg4SuVOG4aC4HLg02EPjmOO4FsAFFwAKzLKwawtW2Aa6dhjkGfl6uLtN8eeMuejJZ4vjCAHjnLVYt02nWN-zRaoOUptizgkHvU1-gvSmOdN74nqjP4jrPXHNhV6IL8aL94zZTOj-2T4QL4KrgwCXT395TDpbj8Gi8wueol30_8v4A_gamXs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2754860990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The dynamic postural steadiness and stabilization time between older adults with and without recurrent low back pain</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sung, Paul S. ; Lee, Dongchul ; Hosmer, Emily</creator><creatorcontrib>Sung, Paul S. ; Lee, Dongchul ; Hosmer, Emily</creatorcontrib><description>Although postural control measures were reported to identify neuromuscular impairments, postural steadiness and stabilization time were not carefully investigated between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain (LBP). Research QuestionAre there group differences in the stabilization time, direction of sway, and dynamic postural steadiness index (DPSI) during one-leg standing? Thirty-four control subjects and 29 subjects with recurrent LBP participated in the study. Each subject stood upright on a single leg with and without visual input. The outcomes were measured for standing duration (sec), direction of sway, and the DPSI, which included the vertical steadiness index (VSI). The VSI assesses fluctuations to standardize the vertical ground reaction forces on the force plate. The control group demonstrated significantly longer standing duration compared to the LBP group during the eyes-open condition (t = 3.55, p = 0.001). The LBP group demonstrated significantly faster stabilization time (t = 2.53, p = 0.01) in the sagittal plane. The DPSI demonstrated an excellent relationship with the VSI without visual input in the control group (r = 0.98, p = 0.001). The directions of sway demonstrated a significant interaction between groups (F = 9.29, p = 0.004). Although standing duration in the eyes-open condition decreased in the LBP group, a faster stabilization time in the sagittal plane was evident compared to the control group to adapt postural stability. These results indicated that vertical dynamic steadiness with visual input might be important to enhance compensatory postural control. •The low back pain group demonstrated faster stabilization in the sagittal plane.•The groups demonstrated a significant interaction with sway directions.•Vertical standing steadiness was enhanced with a longer standing duration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.12.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36516645</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Dynamic postural steadiness ; Humans ; Low Back Pain ; One-leg standing ; Postural Balance ; Posture ; Recurrent low back pain ; Stabilization time ; Time Factors ; Vertical steadiness</subject><ispartof>Gait &amp; posture, 2023-02, Vol.100, p.114-119</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-254ec22bb3f3e1d6b0ef613f13be9a4d0d1e72a1212aa6abd0dc7cac2c4a85ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-254ec22bb3f3e1d6b0ef613f13be9a4d0d1e72a1212aa6abd0dc7cac2c4a85ff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36516645$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sung, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dongchul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosmer, Emily</creatorcontrib><title>The dynamic postural steadiness and stabilization time between older adults with and without recurrent low back pain</title><title>Gait &amp; posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>Although postural control measures were reported to identify neuromuscular impairments, postural steadiness and stabilization time were not carefully investigated between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain (LBP). Research QuestionAre there group differences in the stabilization time, direction of sway, and dynamic postural steadiness index (DPSI) during one-leg standing? Thirty-four control subjects and 29 subjects with recurrent LBP participated in the study. Each subject stood upright on a single leg with and without visual input. The outcomes were measured for standing duration (sec), direction of sway, and the DPSI, which included the vertical steadiness index (VSI). The VSI assesses fluctuations to standardize the vertical ground reaction forces on the force plate. The control group demonstrated significantly longer standing duration compared to the LBP group during the eyes-open condition (t = 3.55, p = 0.001). The LBP group demonstrated significantly faster stabilization time (t = 2.53, p = 0.01) in the sagittal plane. The DPSI demonstrated an excellent relationship with the VSI without visual input in the control group (r = 0.98, p = 0.001). The directions of sway demonstrated a significant interaction between groups (F = 9.29, p = 0.004). Although standing duration in the eyes-open condition decreased in the LBP group, a faster stabilization time in the sagittal plane was evident compared to the control group to adapt postural stability. These results indicated that vertical dynamic steadiness with visual input might be important to enhance compensatory postural control. •The low back pain group demonstrated faster stabilization in the sagittal plane.•The groups demonstrated a significant interaction with sway directions.•Vertical standing steadiness was enhanced with a longer standing duration.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Dynamic postural steadiness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain</subject><subject>One-leg standing</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Recurrent low back pain</subject><subject>Stabilization time</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertical steadiness</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtP3DAUha0KVAboX0BedpPgR-JJdiAEBQmpG1hb1_YNeJrYU9vpiP76ZjrQbVf3oXPu0f0IueCs5oyry039Ar5sYy61YELUXNSM8U9kxbt1XwnB-yOyYr1SlZJKnJDTnDeMsUZ24jM5karlSjXtipSnV6TuLcDkLd2fmxOMNBcE5wPmTCG4ZQTjR_8bio-BFj8hNVh2iIHG0WGi4OaxZLrz5fWvYd_EudCEdk4JQ6Fj3FED9gfdgg_n5HiAMeOX93pGnu9un27uq8fv3x5urh8rK1VXKtE2aIUwRg4SuVOG4aC4HLg02EPjmOO4FsAFFwAKzLKwawtW2Aa6dhjkGfl6uLtN8eeMuejJZ4vjCAHjnLVYt02nWN-zRaoOUptizgkHvU1-gvSmOdN74nqjP4jrPXHNhV6IL8aL94zZTOj-2T4QL4KrgwCXT395TDpbj8Gi8wueol30_8v4A_gamXs</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Sung, Paul S.</creator><creator>Lee, Dongchul</creator><creator>Hosmer, Emily</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>The dynamic postural steadiness and stabilization time between older adults with and without recurrent low back pain</title><author>Sung, Paul S. ; Lee, Dongchul ; Hosmer, Emily</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-254ec22bb3f3e1d6b0ef613f13be9a4d0d1e72a1212aa6abd0dc7cac2c4a85ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Dynamic postural steadiness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain</topic><topic>One-leg standing</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Recurrent low back pain</topic><topic>Stabilization time</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertical steadiness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sung, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dongchul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosmer, Emily</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sung, Paul S.</au><au>Lee, Dongchul</au><au>Hosmer, Emily</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The dynamic postural steadiness and stabilization time between older adults with and without recurrent low back pain</atitle><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>100</volume><spage>114</spage><epage>119</epage><pages>114-119</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>Although postural control measures were reported to identify neuromuscular impairments, postural steadiness and stabilization time were not carefully investigated between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain (LBP). Research QuestionAre there group differences in the stabilization time, direction of sway, and dynamic postural steadiness index (DPSI) during one-leg standing? Thirty-four control subjects and 29 subjects with recurrent LBP participated in the study. Each subject stood upright on a single leg with and without visual input. The outcomes were measured for standing duration (sec), direction of sway, and the DPSI, which included the vertical steadiness index (VSI). The VSI assesses fluctuations to standardize the vertical ground reaction forces on the force plate. The control group demonstrated significantly longer standing duration compared to the LBP group during the eyes-open condition (t = 3.55, p = 0.001). The LBP group demonstrated significantly faster stabilization time (t = 2.53, p = 0.01) in the sagittal plane. The DPSI demonstrated an excellent relationship with the VSI without visual input in the control group (r = 0.98, p = 0.001). The directions of sway demonstrated a significant interaction between groups (F = 9.29, p = 0.004). Although standing duration in the eyes-open condition decreased in the LBP group, a faster stabilization time in the sagittal plane was evident compared to the control group to adapt postural stability. These results indicated that vertical dynamic steadiness with visual input might be important to enhance compensatory postural control. •The low back pain group demonstrated faster stabilization in the sagittal plane.•The groups demonstrated a significant interaction with sway directions.•Vertical standing steadiness was enhanced with a longer standing duration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36516645</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.12.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6362
ispartof Gait & posture, 2023-02, Vol.100, p.114-119
issn 0966-6362
1879-2219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2754860990
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Dynamic postural steadiness
Humans
Low Back Pain
One-leg standing
Postural Balance
Posture
Recurrent low back pain
Stabilization time
Time Factors
Vertical steadiness
title The dynamic postural steadiness and stabilization time between older adults with and without recurrent low back pain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A15%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20dynamic%20postural%20steadiness%20and%20stabilization%20time%20between%20older%20adults%20with%20and%20without%20recurrent%20low%20back%20pain&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Sung,%20Paul%20S.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=100&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=119&rft.pages=114-119&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2754860990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-254ec22bb3f3e1d6b0ef613f13be9a4d0d1e72a1212aa6abd0dc7cac2c4a85ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2754860990&rft_id=info:pmid/36516645&rfr_iscdi=true