Loading…

Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure

In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied radiation and isotopes 2023-02, Vol.192, p.110610-110610, Article 110610
Main Authors: Salah, H., Rabbaa, Mohammad, Abuljoud, Mohammad, Babikir, E., Alkhorayef, M., Tamam, N., Tahir, Dahlang, Sulieman, A., Bradley, D.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763
container_end_page 110610
container_issue
container_start_page 110610
container_title Applied radiation and isotopes
container_volume 192
creator Salah, H.
Rabbaa, Mohammad
Abuljoud, Mohammad
Babikir, E.
Alkhorayef, M.
Tamam, N.
Tahir, Dahlang
Sulieman, A.
Bradley, D.A.
description In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8–45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1–1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27–64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6–2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation. •Pediatric doses radiation risk were assessed to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures.•The patients' doses with CT brain angiography is twice the dose without contrast medium.•Radiosensitive organs (eye lens and thyroid) must be shielded to reduce the radiogenic risk probability.•The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755576145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096980432200495X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2755576145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EouXxC1WWbFL8iJ14B0K8JCRYwIqF5djj4qqJg50g8fe4KmXLamZx7lzNQWhB8JJgIi7XSz1EbX0KS4opXRKCBcEHaE6ampaywfgQzbEUsmxwxWboJKU1xrhqJD1GMyY45ZKwOXp_0WC9HqM3BTgHZvRfUGwv69GHvrAhQSrsFH2_KtqofV-Y0A3TCLYYQxdWUQ8f34XuV36_DzEYyAk4Q0dObxKc_85T9HZ3-3rzUD493z_eXD-VholmLF1VOwnctcJQApI4pilrLDPMuoo6IQlvResEcNm4mpFMt7bCAtM2c7Vgp-hidzc3f06QRtX5ZGCz0T2EKSlac85rQSqeUbFDTQwpRXBqiL7T8VsRrLZi1VrtxaqtWLUTm4OL346p7cD-xfYmM3C1AyB_-uUhqmQ89NmEj9mqssH_1_EDlf2OpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755576145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Salah, H. ; Rabbaa, Mohammad ; Abuljoud, Mohammad ; Babikir, E. ; Alkhorayef, M. ; Tamam, N. ; Tahir, Dahlang ; Sulieman, A. ; Bradley, D.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salah, H. ; Rabbaa, Mohammad ; Abuljoud, Mohammad ; Babikir, E. ; Alkhorayef, M. ; Tamam, N. ; Tahir, Dahlang ; Sulieman, A. ; Bradley, D.A.</creatorcontrib><description>In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8–45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1–1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27–64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6–2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation. •Pediatric doses radiation risk were assessed to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures.•The patients' doses with CT brain angiography is twice the dose without contrast medium.•Radiosensitive organs (eye lens and thyroid) must be shielded to reduce the radiogenic risk probability.•The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-8043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36525913</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Child ; Computed Tomography Angiography ; CT brain ; Diagnostic radiology ; DLP ; Effective dose ; Head ; Humans ; Paediatirc imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation dosimetry ; Reference Values ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Applied radiation and isotopes, 2023-02, Vol.192, p.110610-110610, Article 110610</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36525913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salah, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabbaa, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuljoud, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babikir, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhorayef, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamam, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahir, Dahlang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulieman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, D.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure</title><title>Applied radiation and isotopes</title><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><description>In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8–45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1–1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27–64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6–2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation. •Pediatric doses radiation risk were assessed to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures.•The patients' doses with CT brain angiography is twice the dose without contrast medium.•Radiosensitive organs (eye lens and thyroid) must be shielded to reduce the radiogenic risk probability.•The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography</subject><subject>CT brain</subject><subject>Diagnostic radiology</subject><subject>DLP</subject><subject>Effective dose</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Paediatirc imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation dosimetry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0969-8043</issn><issn>1872-9800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EouXxC1WWbFL8iJ14B0K8JCRYwIqF5djj4qqJg50g8fe4KmXLamZx7lzNQWhB8JJgIi7XSz1EbX0KS4opXRKCBcEHaE6ampaywfgQzbEUsmxwxWboJKU1xrhqJD1GMyY45ZKwOXp_0WC9HqM3BTgHZvRfUGwv69GHvrAhQSrsFH2_KtqofV-Y0A3TCLYYQxdWUQ8f34XuV36_DzEYyAk4Q0dObxKc_85T9HZ3-3rzUD493z_eXD-VholmLF1VOwnctcJQApI4pilrLDPMuoo6IQlvResEcNm4mpFMt7bCAtM2c7Vgp-hidzc3f06QRtX5ZGCz0T2EKSlac85rQSqeUbFDTQwpRXBqiL7T8VsRrLZi1VrtxaqtWLUTm4OL346p7cD-xfYmM3C1AyB_-uUhqmQ89NmEj9mqssH_1_EDlf2OpA</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Salah, H.</creator><creator>Rabbaa, Mohammad</creator><creator>Abuljoud, Mohammad</creator><creator>Babikir, E.</creator><creator>Alkhorayef, M.</creator><creator>Tamam, N.</creator><creator>Tahir, Dahlang</creator><creator>Sulieman, A.</creator><creator>Bradley, D.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure</title><author>Salah, H. ; Rabbaa, Mohammad ; Abuljoud, Mohammad ; Babikir, E. ; Alkhorayef, M. ; Tamam, N. ; Tahir, Dahlang ; Sulieman, A. ; Bradley, D.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography</topic><topic>CT brain</topic><topic>Diagnostic radiology</topic><topic>DLP</topic><topic>Effective dose</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Paediatirc imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation dosimetry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salah, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabbaa, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuljoud, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babikir, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhorayef, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamam, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahir, Dahlang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulieman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, D.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salah, H.</au><au>Rabbaa, Mohammad</au><au>Abuljoud, Mohammad</au><au>Babikir, E.</au><au>Alkhorayef, M.</au><au>Tamam, N.</au><au>Tahir, Dahlang</au><au>Sulieman, A.</au><au>Bradley, D.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure</atitle><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>192</volume><spage>110610</spage><epage>110610</epage><pages>110610-110610</pages><artnum>110610</artnum><issn>0969-8043</issn><eissn>1872-9800</eissn><abstract>In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8–45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1–1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27–64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6–2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation. •Pediatric doses radiation risk were assessed to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures.•The patients' doses with CT brain angiography is twice the dose without contrast medium.•Radiosensitive organs (eye lens and thyroid) must be shielded to reduce the radiogenic risk probability.•The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36525913</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-8043
ispartof Applied radiation and isotopes, 2023-02, Vol.192, p.110610-110610, Article 110610
issn 0969-8043
1872-9800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755576145
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adult
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Child
Computed Tomography Angiography
CT brain
Diagnostic radiology
DLP
Effective dose
Head
Humans
Paediatirc imaging
Radiation Dosage
Radiation dosimetry
Reference Values
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A33%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paediatric%20effective%20radiation%20doses%20during%20brain%20computed%20tomography%20angiography%20procedure&rft.jtitle=Applied%20radiation%20and%20isotopes&rft.au=Salah,%20H.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=192&rft.spage=110610&rft.epage=110610&rft.pages=110610-110610&rft.artnum=110610&rft.issn=0969-8043&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2755576145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755576145&rft_id=info:pmid/36525913&rfr_iscdi=true