Loading…
Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure
In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied radiation and isotopes 2023-02, Vol.192, p.110610-110610, Article 110610 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763 |
container_end_page | 110610 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110610 |
container_title | Applied radiation and isotopes |
container_volume | 192 |
creator | Salah, H. Rabbaa, Mohammad Abuljoud, Mohammad Babikir, E. Alkhorayef, M. Tamam, N. Tahir, Dahlang Sulieman, A. Bradley, D.A. |
description | In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8–45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1–1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27–64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6–2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation.
•Pediatric doses radiation risk were assessed to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures.•The patients' doses with CT brain angiography is twice the dose without contrast medium.•Radiosensitive organs (eye lens and thyroid) must be shielded to reduce the radiogenic risk probability.•The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755576145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S096980432200495X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2755576145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EouXxC1WWbFL8iJ14B0K8JCRYwIqF5djj4qqJg50g8fe4KmXLamZx7lzNQWhB8JJgIi7XSz1EbX0KS4opXRKCBcEHaE6ampaywfgQzbEUsmxwxWboJKU1xrhqJD1GMyY45ZKwOXp_0WC9HqM3BTgHZvRfUGwv69GHvrAhQSrsFH2_KtqofV-Y0A3TCLYYQxdWUQ8f34XuV36_DzEYyAk4Q0dObxKc_85T9HZ3-3rzUD493z_eXD-VholmLF1VOwnctcJQApI4pilrLDPMuoo6IQlvResEcNm4mpFMt7bCAtM2c7Vgp-hidzc3f06QRtX5ZGCz0T2EKSlac85rQSqeUbFDTQwpRXBqiL7T8VsRrLZi1VrtxaqtWLUTm4OL346p7cD-xfYmM3C1AyB_-uUhqmQ89NmEj9mqssH_1_EDlf2OpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2755576145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Salah, H. ; Rabbaa, Mohammad ; Abuljoud, Mohammad ; Babikir, E. ; Alkhorayef, M. ; Tamam, N. ; Tahir, Dahlang ; Sulieman, A. ; Bradley, D.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salah, H. ; Rabbaa, Mohammad ; Abuljoud, Mohammad ; Babikir, E. ; Alkhorayef, M. ; Tamam, N. ; Tahir, Dahlang ; Sulieman, A. ; Bradley, D.A.</creatorcontrib><description>In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8–45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1–1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27–64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6–2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation.
•Pediatric doses radiation risk were assessed to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures.•The patients' doses with CT brain angiography is twice the dose without contrast medium.•Radiosensitive organs (eye lens and thyroid) must be shielded to reduce the radiogenic risk probability.•The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-8043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36525913</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Child ; Computed Tomography Angiography ; CT brain ; Diagnostic radiology ; DLP ; Effective dose ; Head ; Humans ; Paediatirc imaging ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation dosimetry ; Reference Values ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Applied radiation and isotopes, 2023-02, Vol.192, p.110610-110610, Article 110610</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36525913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salah, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabbaa, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuljoud, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babikir, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhorayef, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamam, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahir, Dahlang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulieman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, D.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure</title><title>Applied radiation and isotopes</title><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><description>In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8–45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1–1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27–64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6–2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation.
•Pediatric doses radiation risk were assessed to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures.•The patients' doses with CT brain angiography is twice the dose without contrast medium.•Radiosensitive organs (eye lens and thyroid) must be shielded to reduce the radiogenic risk probability.•The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography</subject><subject>CT brain</subject><subject>Diagnostic radiology</subject><subject>DLP</subject><subject>Effective dose</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Paediatirc imaging</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation dosimetry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0969-8043</issn><issn>1872-9800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EouXxC1WWbFL8iJ14B0K8JCRYwIqF5djj4qqJg50g8fe4KmXLamZx7lzNQWhB8JJgIi7XSz1EbX0KS4opXRKCBcEHaE6ampaywfgQzbEUsmxwxWboJKU1xrhqJD1GMyY45ZKwOXp_0WC9HqM3BTgHZvRfUGwv69GHvrAhQSrsFH2_KtqofV-Y0A3TCLYYQxdWUQ8f34XuV36_DzEYyAk4Q0dObxKc_85T9HZ3-3rzUD493z_eXD-VholmLF1VOwnctcJQApI4pilrLDPMuoo6IQlvResEcNm4mpFMt7bCAtM2c7Vgp-hidzc3f06QRtX5ZGCz0T2EKSlac85rQSqeUbFDTQwpRXBqiL7T8VsRrLZi1VrtxaqtWLUTm4OL346p7cD-xfYmM3C1AyB_-uUhqmQ89NmEj9mqssH_1_EDlf2OpA</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Salah, H.</creator><creator>Rabbaa, Mohammad</creator><creator>Abuljoud, Mohammad</creator><creator>Babikir, E.</creator><creator>Alkhorayef, M.</creator><creator>Tamam, N.</creator><creator>Tahir, Dahlang</creator><creator>Sulieman, A.</creator><creator>Bradley, D.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure</title><author>Salah, H. ; Rabbaa, Mohammad ; Abuljoud, Mohammad ; Babikir, E. ; Alkhorayef, M. ; Tamam, N. ; Tahir, Dahlang ; Sulieman, A. ; Bradley, D.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography</topic><topic>CT brain</topic><topic>Diagnostic radiology</topic><topic>DLP</topic><topic>Effective dose</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Paediatirc imaging</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation dosimetry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salah, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabbaa, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abuljoud, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babikir, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkhorayef, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamam, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahir, Dahlang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulieman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, D.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salah, H.</au><au>Rabbaa, Mohammad</au><au>Abuljoud, Mohammad</au><au>Babikir, E.</au><au>Alkhorayef, M.</au><au>Tamam, N.</au><au>Tahir, Dahlang</au><au>Sulieman, A.</au><au>Bradley, D.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure</atitle><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Radiat Isot</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>192</volume><spage>110610</spage><epage>110610</epage><pages>110610-110610</pages><artnum>110610</artnum><issn>0969-8043</issn><eissn>1872-9800</eissn><abstract>In comparison to adults and paediatric are more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Computed tomography (CT) is now the dominant source of medical radiologic tests for patients, accounting for more than 70% of total doses to the general public. Paediatric CT brain scans (with and without contrast) are routinely performed for a variety of clinical reasons. As a result, this parameter must be calculated in order to determine relative radiation risk. The goal of this study is to assess the radiation risk to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures. Three hundred fifty three child patients' radiation risk doses were assessed over the course of a year. The mean and ranged of the children's radiation doses were 40.6 ± 8.8 (27.8–45.8) CTDIvol (mGy) and 850 ± 230 (568.1–1126.4) DLP (mGy.cm) for the brain with contrast medium. For CT brain without contrast, the patients' doses were 40.9 ± 9.4 (14.27–64.07) CTDIvol (mGy), and 866.1 ± 289.3 (203.6–2484.9) DLP (mGy.cm). The characteristics related to the radiation dose were retrieved from the scan protocol generated by the CT system by the participating physicians after each procedure. Furthermore, optimizing the CT acquisition parameter is critical for increasing the benefit while lowering the procedure's radiogenic risk. The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies and international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). Radiation dose optimization is recommended due to high sensitivity of the paediatric patients to ionizing radiation.
•Pediatric doses radiation risk were assessed to children during CT brain diagnostic procedures.•The patients' doses with CT brain angiography is twice the dose without contrast medium.•Radiosensitive organs (eye lens and thyroid) must be shielded to reduce the radiogenic risk probability.•The patients' radiation dose is comparable with the most previously published studies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36525913</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-8043 |
ispartof | Applied radiation and isotopes, 2023-02, Vol.192, p.110610-110610, Article 110610 |
issn | 0969-8043 1872-9800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2755576145 |
source | Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Adult Brain - diagnostic imaging Child Computed Tomography Angiography CT brain Diagnostic radiology DLP Effective dose Head Humans Paediatirc imaging Radiation Dosage Radiation dosimetry Reference Values Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Paediatric effective radiation doses during brain computed tomography angiography procedure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A33%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paediatric%20effective%20radiation%20doses%20during%20brain%20computed%20tomography%20angiography%20procedure&rft.jtitle=Applied%20radiation%20and%20isotopes&rft.au=Salah,%20H.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=192&rft.spage=110610&rft.epage=110610&rft.pages=110610-110610&rft.artnum=110610&rft.issn=0969-8043&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2755576145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-f47f9e5fb6c21e91f3a238d3c3df42f6915b6bf6e598f7317f9bd40602b238763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2755576145&rft_id=info:pmid/36525913&rfr_iscdi=true |