Loading…

Long‐term outcomes following intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for calcified coronary lesions: A Real‐World Multicenter European Study

Objectives To explore the long‐term clinical outcomes following intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in calcified coronary lesions from a real‐world population. Background IVL is a relatively new but promising modality for treating coronary calcified lesions, but there is a dearth of long‐term outcome da...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2023-02, Vol.101 (2), p.250-260
Main Authors: Basavarajaiah, Sandeep, Ielasi, Alfonso, Raja, Waseem, Naneishvili, Tamara, Testa, Luca, Popolo Rubbio, Antonio, Mastrangelo, Angelo, Bartorelli, Antonio L., Bhatia, Gurbir, Choudhury, Anirban, Sundara‐Raman, Ajay, Buono, Andrea, Sharma, Vinoda, Cortese, Bernardo, Marchesi, Alessia, Pitt, Michael, Raju, Prashanth, Wassef, Nancy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives To explore the long‐term clinical outcomes following intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in calcified coronary lesions from a real‐world population. Background IVL is a relatively new but promising modality for treating coronary calcified lesions, but there is a dearth of long‐term outcome data from real‐world patients. Methods This was a multicenter, observational study in which we enrolled all patients treated with IVL from November 2018 to February 2021 from eight centers in Europe and the United Kingdom. Procedural success, complications, and clinical outcomes (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [TVMI], target lesion revascularization [TLR], and MACE [major adverse cardiac events, the composite of cardiac death, TVMI, and TLR]) were assessed. Results In total, 273 patients with a mean age of 72 ± 9.1 years were treated with IVL. Major comorbidities included diabetes mellitus (n = 110, 40%) and chronic kidney disease (n = 45, 16%). Acute coronary syndrome accounted for 48% (n = 132) of patients, while 52% (n = 141) had stable angina. De novo lesions and in‐stent restenosis accounted for 79% and 21% of cases, respectively. Intravascular imaging was used in 33% (n = 90) of patients. An upfront IVL strategy was adopted in 34% (n = 92), while the rest were bailout procedures. Adjuvant rotational atherectomy (“RotaTripsy”) was required in 11% (n = 31) of cases. The procedural success was 99%. During a median follow‐up of 687 days (interquartile range: 549–787), cardiac death occurred in 5% (n = 14), TVMI in 3% (n = 8), TLR in 6% (n = 16), and MACE rate was 11% (n = 30). Conclusion This is the largest multicenter registry with a long‐term follow‐up showing the remarkably high procedural success of IVL use in calcified coronary lesions with low rates of hard endpoints and MACE.
ISSN:1522-1946
1522-726X
1522-726X
DOI:10.1002/ccd.30519