Loading…

COVID-19 vaccine incentive scheduling using an optimally controlled reinforcement learning model

We model Covid-19 vaccine uptake as a reinforcement learning dynamic between two populations: the vaccine adopters, and the vaccine hesitant. Using data available from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), we estimate the payoff matrix governing the interaction between these two groups over time and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physica. D 2023-03, Vol.445, p.133613, Article 133613
Main Authors: Stuckey, K., Newton, P.K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9021b739c773c3feb6396bab86c647ce1f61a91dcecf51f515f52b4657ddb47c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9021b739c773c3feb6396bab86c647ce1f61a91dcecf51f515f52b4657ddb47c3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 133613
container_title Physica. D
container_volume 445
creator Stuckey, K.
Newton, P.K.
description We model Covid-19 vaccine uptake as a reinforcement learning dynamic between two populations: the vaccine adopters, and the vaccine hesitant. Using data available from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), we estimate the payoff matrix governing the interaction between these two groups over time and show they are playing a Hawk–Dove evolutionary game with an internal evolutionarily stable Nash equilibrium (the asymptotic percentage of vaccinated in the population). We then ask whether vaccine adoption can be improved by implementing dynamic incentive schedules that reward/punish the vaccine hesitant, and if so, what schedules are optimal and how effective are they likely to be? When is the optimal time to start an incentive program, how large should the incentives be, and is there a point of diminishing returns? By using a tailored replicator dynamic reinforcement learning model together with optimal control theory, we show that well designed and timed incentive programs can improve vaccine uptake by shifting the Nash equilibrium upward in large populations, but only so much, and incentive sizes above a certain threshold show diminishing returns. •Covid-19 vaccine uptake is modeled as a Hawk–Dove evolutionary game.•Two populations of players compete: vaccine adopters and vaccine hesitant.•Optimal control is used to test different dynamic incentive strategies.•Dynamic incentives can increase vaccine uptake, but only so much.•Larger incentives do not necessary produce better responses.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.physd.2022.133613
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2756672422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167278922003177</els_id><sourcerecordid>2756672422</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9021b739c773c3feb6396bab86c647ce1f61a91dcecf51f515f52b4657ddb47c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVoiN0kv6BQ9tjLuvrYlbyHHoqTtoZALkmuyu5oNpbRSq60a_C_j1y7PRbECIbnnWEeQj4xumCUya_bxW5zSGbBKecLJoRk4oLM2VLxcplbH8g8U6rkatnMyMeUtpRSpoS6IjMh64pypebkdfX4sr4rWVPsWwDrsbAe0I92j0WCDZrJWf9WTOlYW1-E3WiH1rlDAcGPMTiHpohofR8i4JCThcM2-iM-BIPuhlz2rUt4e_6vyfOP-6fVr_Lh8ed69f2hhIpWY9lQzjolGlBKgOixk6KRXdstJchKAbJesrZhBhD6muVX9zXvKlkrY7oMiGvy5TR3F8PvCdOoB5sAnWs9hilprmopFa84z6g4oRBDShF7vYv5qHjQjOqjWr3Vf9Tqo1p9UptTn88Lpm5A8y_z12UGvp0AzGfuLUadwGK2aWxEGLUJ9r8L3gGk3YxG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2756672422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COVID-19 vaccine incentive scheduling using an optimally controlled reinforcement learning model</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stuckey, K. ; Newton, P.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stuckey, K. ; Newton, P.K.</creatorcontrib><description>We model Covid-19 vaccine uptake as a reinforcement learning dynamic between two populations: the vaccine adopters, and the vaccine hesitant. Using data available from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), we estimate the payoff matrix governing the interaction between these two groups over time and show they are playing a Hawk–Dove evolutionary game with an internal evolutionarily stable Nash equilibrium (the asymptotic percentage of vaccinated in the population). We then ask whether vaccine adoption can be improved by implementing dynamic incentive schedules that reward/punish the vaccine hesitant, and if so, what schedules are optimal and how effective are they likely to be? When is the optimal time to start an incentive program, how large should the incentives be, and is there a point of diminishing returns? By using a tailored replicator dynamic reinforcement learning model together with optimal control theory, we show that well designed and timed incentive programs can improve vaccine uptake by shifting the Nash equilibrium upward in large populations, but only so much, and incentive sizes above a certain threshold show diminishing returns. •Covid-19 vaccine uptake is modeled as a Hawk–Dove evolutionary game.•Two populations of players compete: vaccine adopters and vaccine hesitant.•Optimal control is used to test different dynamic incentive strategies.•Dynamic incentives can increase vaccine uptake, but only so much.•Larger incentives do not necessary produce better responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-2789</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2022.133613</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36540277</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Dynamic incentives ; Evolutionary game theory ; Hawk–Dove games ; Optimal control ; Reinforcement learning dynamics ; Vaccine uptake dynamics</subject><ispartof>Physica. D, 2023-03, Vol.445, p.133613, Article 133613</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9021b739c773c3feb6396bab86c647ce1f61a91dcecf51f515f52b4657ddb47c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9021b739c773c3feb6396bab86c647ce1f61a91dcecf51f515f52b4657ddb47c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9477-0318</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36540277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stuckey, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, P.K.</creatorcontrib><title>COVID-19 vaccine incentive scheduling using an optimally controlled reinforcement learning model</title><title>Physica. D</title><addtitle>Physica D</addtitle><description>We model Covid-19 vaccine uptake as a reinforcement learning dynamic between two populations: the vaccine adopters, and the vaccine hesitant. Using data available from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), we estimate the payoff matrix governing the interaction between these two groups over time and show they are playing a Hawk–Dove evolutionary game with an internal evolutionarily stable Nash equilibrium (the asymptotic percentage of vaccinated in the population). We then ask whether vaccine adoption can be improved by implementing dynamic incentive schedules that reward/punish the vaccine hesitant, and if so, what schedules are optimal and how effective are they likely to be? When is the optimal time to start an incentive program, how large should the incentives be, and is there a point of diminishing returns? By using a tailored replicator dynamic reinforcement learning model together with optimal control theory, we show that well designed and timed incentive programs can improve vaccine uptake by shifting the Nash equilibrium upward in large populations, but only so much, and incentive sizes above a certain threshold show diminishing returns. •Covid-19 vaccine uptake is modeled as a Hawk–Dove evolutionary game.•Two populations of players compete: vaccine adopters and vaccine hesitant.•Optimal control is used to test different dynamic incentive strategies.•Dynamic incentives can increase vaccine uptake, but only so much.•Larger incentives do not necessary produce better responses.</description><subject>Dynamic incentives</subject><subject>Evolutionary game theory</subject><subject>Hawk–Dove games</subject><subject>Optimal control</subject><subject>Reinforcement learning dynamics</subject><subject>Vaccine uptake dynamics</subject><issn>0167-2789</issn><issn>1872-8022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVoiN0kv6BQ9tjLuvrYlbyHHoqTtoZALkmuyu5oNpbRSq60a_C_j1y7PRbECIbnnWEeQj4xumCUya_bxW5zSGbBKecLJoRk4oLM2VLxcplbH8g8U6rkatnMyMeUtpRSpoS6IjMh64pypebkdfX4sr4rWVPsWwDrsbAe0I92j0WCDZrJWf9WTOlYW1-E3WiH1rlDAcGPMTiHpohofR8i4JCThcM2-iM-BIPuhlz2rUt4e_6vyfOP-6fVr_Lh8ed69f2hhIpWY9lQzjolGlBKgOixk6KRXdstJchKAbJesrZhBhD6muVX9zXvKlkrY7oMiGvy5TR3F8PvCdOoB5sAnWs9hilprmopFa84z6g4oRBDShF7vYv5qHjQjOqjWr3Vf9Tqo1p9UptTn88Lpm5A8y_z12UGvp0AzGfuLUadwGK2aWxEGLUJ9r8L3gGk3YxG</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Stuckey, K.</creator><creator>Newton, P.K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9477-0318</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>COVID-19 vaccine incentive scheduling using an optimally controlled reinforcement learning model</title><author>Stuckey, K. ; Newton, P.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9021b739c773c3feb6396bab86c647ce1f61a91dcecf51f515f52b4657ddb47c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Dynamic incentives</topic><topic>Evolutionary game theory</topic><topic>Hawk–Dove games</topic><topic>Optimal control</topic><topic>Reinforcement learning dynamics</topic><topic>Vaccine uptake dynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stuckey, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, P.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physica. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stuckey, K.</au><au>Newton, P.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COVID-19 vaccine incentive scheduling using an optimally controlled reinforcement learning model</atitle><jtitle>Physica. D</jtitle><addtitle>Physica D</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>445</volume><spage>133613</spage><pages>133613-</pages><artnum>133613</artnum><issn>0167-2789</issn><eissn>1872-8022</eissn><abstract>We model Covid-19 vaccine uptake as a reinforcement learning dynamic between two populations: the vaccine adopters, and the vaccine hesitant. Using data available from the Center for Disease Control (CDC), we estimate the payoff matrix governing the interaction between these two groups over time and show they are playing a Hawk–Dove evolutionary game with an internal evolutionarily stable Nash equilibrium (the asymptotic percentage of vaccinated in the population). We then ask whether vaccine adoption can be improved by implementing dynamic incentive schedules that reward/punish the vaccine hesitant, and if so, what schedules are optimal and how effective are they likely to be? When is the optimal time to start an incentive program, how large should the incentives be, and is there a point of diminishing returns? By using a tailored replicator dynamic reinforcement learning model together with optimal control theory, we show that well designed and timed incentive programs can improve vaccine uptake by shifting the Nash equilibrium upward in large populations, but only so much, and incentive sizes above a certain threshold show diminishing returns. •Covid-19 vaccine uptake is modeled as a Hawk–Dove evolutionary game.•Two populations of players compete: vaccine adopters and vaccine hesitant.•Optimal control is used to test different dynamic incentive strategies.•Dynamic incentives can increase vaccine uptake, but only so much.•Larger incentives do not necessary produce better responses.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36540277</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.physd.2022.133613</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9477-0318</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-2789
ispartof Physica. D, 2023-03, Vol.445, p.133613, Article 133613
issn 0167-2789
1872-8022
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2756672422
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Dynamic incentives
Evolutionary game theory
Hawk–Dove games
Optimal control
Reinforcement learning dynamics
Vaccine uptake dynamics
title COVID-19 vaccine incentive scheduling using an optimally controlled reinforcement learning model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A54%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COVID-19%20vaccine%20incentive%20scheduling%20using%20an%20optimally%20controlled%20reinforcement%20learning%20model&rft.jtitle=Physica.%20D&rft.au=Stuckey,%20K.&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=445&rft.spage=133613&rft.pages=133613-&rft.artnum=133613&rft.issn=0167-2789&rft.eissn=1872-8022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physd.2022.133613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2756672422%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-9021b739c773c3feb6396bab86c647ce1f61a91dcecf51f515f52b4657ddb47c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2756672422&rft_id=info:pmid/36540277&rfr_iscdi=true