Comparison of ground reaction force and marker-based methods to estimate mediolateral center of mass displacement and margins of stability during walking

Dynamic balance control during human walking can be described by the distance between the mediolateral (ML) extrapolated center of mass (XCoM) position and the base of support, the margin of stability (MoS). The ML center of mass (CoM) position during treadmill walking can be estimated based on kine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomechanics 2023-01, Vol.146, p.111415-111415, Article 111415
Main Authors: Buurke, Tom J.W., van de Venis, Lotte, den Otter, Rob, Nonnekes, Jorik, Keijsers, Noël
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Balance
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomechanics
Center of mass
Center of pressure
Correlation coefficients
Dynamic stability
Fitness equipment
Force plate
Gait
Humans
Kinematics
Locomotion
Mechanical Phenomena
Methods
Motion capture
Postural Balance
Stability
Treadmills
Validation
Velocity
Walking
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-ff66cdf18eb47e0b97c5b2e999a7c9c15d6c76d13b96586783bb955fe5bec3b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-ff66cdf18eb47e0b97c5b2e999a7c9c15d6c76d13b96586783bb955fe5bec3b63
container_end_page 111415
container_issue
container_start_page 111415
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 146
creator Buurke, Tom J.W.
van de Venis, Lotte
den Otter, Rob
Nonnekes, Jorik
Keijsers, Noël
description Dynamic balance control during human walking can be described by the distance between the mediolateral (ML) extrapolated center of mass (XCoM) position and the base of support, the margin of stability (MoS). The ML center of mass (CoM) position during treadmill walking can be estimated based on kinematic data (marker-based method) and a combination of ground reaction forces and center of pressure positions (GRF-based method). Here, we compare a GRF-based method with a full-body marker-based method for estimating the ML CoM, ML XCoM and ML MoS. Fifteen healthy adults walked on a dual-belt treadmill at comfortable walking speed for three minutes. Kinetic and kinematic data were collected and analyzed using a GRF-based and marker-based method to compare the ML CoM, ML XCoM and ML MoS. High correlation coefficients (r > 0.98) and small differences (Root Mean Square Difference 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111415
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2757054855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929022004560</els_id><sourcerecordid>2765061888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-ff66cdf18eb47e0b97c5b2e999a7c9c15d6c76d13b96586783bb955fe5bec3b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYeWV6gssWGTwU7ivx1oxJ9UiU27tmznZuo0iQc7AfVReFvuaDos2LC610ffvbbPIeSGsy1nXL4ftoOPaYLwsK1ZXW855y0XL8iGa9VUdaPZS7JhrOaVqQ27JK9LGRhjqlXmFblspGhRFhvye5emg8uxpJmmnu5zWueOZnBhiSj1KQegDqXJ5UfIlXcF8ADLQ-oKXRKFssTJLYBaF9OIXXYjDTBjc9w4uVJoF8thdAEmlM_b9nEuR6AszscxLk-0W3Oc9_SXGx-xXpOL3o0F3jzXK3L_-dPd7mt1-_3Lt93H2yq0bbtUfS9l6HquwbcKmDcqCF-DMcapYAIXnQxKdrzxRgotlW68N0L0IDyExsvmirw77T3k9GPF79gplgDj6GZIa7G1EoqJVguB6Nt_0CGtecbXISUFk1xrjZQ8USGnUjL09pDRovxkObPH8Oxgz-HZY3j2FB4O3jyvXz26-XfsnBYCH04AoB8_I2RbQoQ5oPMZwmK7FP93xx99nrGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2765061888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of ground reaction force and marker-based methods to estimate mediolateral center of mass displacement and margins of stability during walking</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Buurke, Tom J.W. ; van de Venis, Lotte ; den Otter, Rob ; Nonnekes, Jorik ; Keijsers, Noël</creator><creatorcontrib>Buurke, Tom J.W. ; van de Venis, Lotte ; den Otter, Rob ; Nonnekes, Jorik ; Keijsers, Noël</creatorcontrib><description>Dynamic balance control during human walking can be described by the distance between the mediolateral (ML) extrapolated center of mass (XCoM) position and the base of support, the margin of stability (MoS). The ML center of mass (CoM) position during treadmill walking can be estimated based on kinematic data (marker-based method) and a combination of ground reaction forces and center of pressure positions (GRF-based method). Here, we compare a GRF-based method with a full-body marker-based method for estimating the ML CoM, ML XCoM and ML MoS. Fifteen healthy adults walked on a dual-belt treadmill at comfortable walking speed for three minutes. Kinetic and kinematic data were collected and analyzed using a GRF-based and marker-based method to compare the ML CoM, ML XCoM and ML MoS. High correlation coefficients (r &gt; 0.98) and small differences (Root Mean Square Difference &lt; 0.0072 m) in ML CoM and ML XCoM were found between the GRF-based and marker-based methods. The GRF-based method resulted in larger ML XCoM excursion (0.0118 ± 0.0074 m) and smaller ML MoS values (0.0062 ± 0.0028 m) than the marker-based method, but these differences were consistent across participants. In conclusion, the GRF-based method is a valid method to determine the ML CoM, XCoM and MoS. One should be aware of higher ML XCoM and smaller ML MoS values in the GRF-based method when comparing absolute values between studies. The GRF-based method strongly reduces measurement times and can be used to provide real-time CoM-CoP feedback during treadmill gait training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36542905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Balance ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Center of mass ; Center of pressure ; Correlation coefficients ; Dynamic stability ; Fitness equipment ; Force plate ; Gait ; Humans ; Kinematics ; Locomotion ; Mechanical Phenomena ; Methods ; Motion capture ; Postural Balance ; Stability ; Treadmills ; Validation ; Velocity ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2023-01, Vol.146, p.111415-111415, Article 111415</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-ff66cdf18eb47e0b97c5b2e999a7c9c15d6c76d13b96586783bb955fe5bec3b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-ff66cdf18eb47e0b97c5b2e999a7c9c15d6c76d13b96586783bb955fe5bec3b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36542905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buurke, Tom J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Venis, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Otter, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonnekes, Jorik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keijsers, Noël</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of ground reaction force and marker-based methods to estimate mediolateral center of mass displacement and margins of stability during walking</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Dynamic balance control during human walking can be described by the distance between the mediolateral (ML) extrapolated center of mass (XCoM) position and the base of support, the margin of stability (MoS). The ML center of mass (CoM) position during treadmill walking can be estimated based on kinematic data (marker-based method) and a combination of ground reaction forces and center of pressure positions (GRF-based method). Here, we compare a GRF-based method with a full-body marker-based method for estimating the ML CoM, ML XCoM and ML MoS. Fifteen healthy adults walked on a dual-belt treadmill at comfortable walking speed for three minutes. Kinetic and kinematic data were collected and analyzed using a GRF-based and marker-based method to compare the ML CoM, ML XCoM and ML MoS. High correlation coefficients (r &gt; 0.98) and small differences (Root Mean Square Difference &lt; 0.0072 m) in ML CoM and ML XCoM were found between the GRF-based and marker-based methods. The GRF-based method resulted in larger ML XCoM excursion (0.0118 ± 0.0074 m) and smaller ML MoS values (0.0062 ± 0.0028 m) than the marker-based method, but these differences were consistent across participants. In conclusion, the GRF-based method is a valid method to determine the ML CoM, XCoM and MoS. One should be aware of higher ML XCoM and smaller ML MoS values in the GRF-based method when comparing absolute values between studies. The GRF-based method strongly reduces measurement times and can be used to provide real-time CoM-CoP feedback during treadmill gait training.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Balance</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Center of mass</subject><subject>Center of pressure</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Dynamic stability</subject><subject>Fitness equipment</subject><subject>Force plate</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Locomotion</subject><subject>Mechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Motion capture</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Treadmills</subject><subject>Validation</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERYeWV6gssWGTwU7ivx1oxJ9UiU27tmznZuo0iQc7AfVReFvuaDos2LC610ffvbbPIeSGsy1nXL4ftoOPaYLwsK1ZXW855y0XL8iGa9VUdaPZS7JhrOaVqQ27JK9LGRhjqlXmFblspGhRFhvye5emg8uxpJmmnu5zWueOZnBhiSj1KQegDqXJ5UfIlXcF8ADLQ-oKXRKFssTJLYBaF9OIXXYjDTBjc9w4uVJoF8thdAEmlM_b9nEuR6AszscxLk-0W3Oc9_SXGx-xXpOL3o0F3jzXK3L_-dPd7mt1-_3Lt93H2yq0bbtUfS9l6HquwbcKmDcqCF-DMcapYAIXnQxKdrzxRgotlW68N0L0IDyExsvmirw77T3k9GPF79gplgDj6GZIa7G1EoqJVguB6Nt_0CGtecbXISUFk1xrjZQ8USGnUjL09pDRovxkObPH8Oxgz-HZY3j2FB4O3jyvXz26-XfsnBYCH04AoB8_I2RbQoQ5oPMZwmK7FP93xx99nrGg</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Buurke, Tom J.W.</creator><creator>van de Venis, Lotte</creator><creator>den Otter, Rob</creator><creator>Nonnekes, Jorik</creator><creator>Keijsers, Noël</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Comparison of ground reaction force and marker-based methods to estimate mediolateral center of mass displacement and margins of stability during walking</title><author>Buurke, Tom J.W. ; van de Venis, Lotte ; den Otter, Rob ; Nonnekes, Jorik ; Keijsers, Noël</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-ff66cdf18eb47e0b97c5b2e999a7c9c15d6c76d13b96586783bb955fe5bec3b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Balance</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Center of mass</topic><topic>Center of pressure</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Dynamic stability</topic><topic>Fitness equipment</topic><topic>Force plate</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Locomotion</topic><topic>Mechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Motion capture</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Treadmills</topic><topic>Validation</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buurke, Tom J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Venis, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>den Otter, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonnekes, Jorik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keijsers, Noël</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buurke, Tom J.W.</au><au>van de Venis, Lotte</au><au>den Otter, Rob</au><au>Nonnekes, Jorik</au><au>Keijsers, Noël</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of ground reaction force and marker-based methods to estimate mediolateral center of mass displacement and margins of stability during walking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>146</volume><spage>111415</spage><epage>111415</epage><pages>111415-111415</pages><artnum>111415</artnum><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Dynamic balance control during human walking can be described by the distance between the mediolateral (ML) extrapolated center of mass (XCoM) position and the base of support, the margin of stability (MoS). The ML center of mass (CoM) position during treadmill walking can be estimated based on kinematic data (marker-based method) and a combination of ground reaction forces and center of pressure positions (GRF-based method). Here, we compare a GRF-based method with a full-body marker-based method for estimating the ML CoM, ML XCoM and ML MoS. Fifteen healthy adults walked on a dual-belt treadmill at comfortable walking speed for three minutes. Kinetic and kinematic data were collected and analyzed using a GRF-based and marker-based method to compare the ML CoM, ML XCoM and ML MoS. High correlation coefficients (r &gt; 0.98) and small differences (Root Mean Square Difference &lt; 0.0072 m) in ML CoM and ML XCoM were found between the GRF-based and marker-based methods. The GRF-based method resulted in larger ML XCoM excursion (0.0118 ± 0.0074 m) and smaller ML MoS values (0.0062 ± 0.0028 m) than the marker-based method, but these differences were consistent across participants. In conclusion, the GRF-based method is a valid method to determine the ML CoM, XCoM and MoS. One should be aware of higher ML XCoM and smaller ML MoS values in the GRF-based method when comparing absolute values between studies. The GRF-based method strongly reduces measurement times and can be used to provide real-time CoM-CoP feedback during treadmill gait training.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36542905</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111415</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2023-01, Vol.146, p.111415-111415, Article 111415
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2757054855
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adult
Balance
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomechanics
Center of mass
Center of pressure
Correlation coefficients
Dynamic stability
Fitness equipment
Force plate
Gait
Humans
Kinematics
Locomotion
Mechanical Phenomena
Methods
Motion capture
Postural Balance
Stability
Treadmills
Validation
Velocity
Walking
title Comparison of ground reaction force and marker-based methods to estimate mediolateral center of mass displacement and margins of stability during walking
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A25%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20ground%20reaction%20force%20and%20marker-based%20methods%20to%20estimate%20mediolateral%20center%20of%20mass%20displacement%20and%20margins%20of%20stability%20during%20walking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Buurke,%20Tom%20J.W.&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=146&rft.spage=111415&rft.epage=111415&rft.pages=111415-111415&rft.artnum=111415&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2765061888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-ff66cdf18eb47e0b97c5b2e999a7c9c15d6c76d13b96586783bb955fe5bec3b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2765061888&rft_id=info:pmid/36542905&rfr_iscdi=true