Haemodynamic and respiratory perioperative outcomes for open versus robot‐assisted radical cystectomy: A double‐blinded, randomised trial

• Published in: Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2023-03, Vol.67 (3), p.293-301
• Main Authors: Vejlgaard, Maja, Maibom, Sophia L., Joensen, Ulla N., Kehlet, Henrik, Bundgaard‐Nielsen, Morten, Aasvang, Eske K., Røder, Andreas
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analgesics; Anesthesia; Blood pressure; Carbon Dioxide; CO2 pneumoperitoneum; Cystectomy - adverse effects; Cystectomy - methods; Feasibility studies; Hemodynamics; Humans; Narcotics; open surgery; Patients; Pneumoperitoneum; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - etiology; post‐anaesthesia recovery; radical cystectomy; Randomization; Respiration; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods; Robotics; Robots; robot‐assisted surgery; Saturation; Treatment Outcome; Trendelenburg position
• ISSN: 0001-5172; 1399-6576
• DOI: 10.1111/aas.14187

Background The clinical impact of prolonged steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum during robot‐assisted radical cystectomy (RC) on intraoperative conditions and immediate postoperative recovery remains to be assessed. The current study investigates intraoperative and immediate postoperative outcomes for open RC (ORC) versus robot‐assisted RC with intracorporal urinary diversion (iRARC) in a blinded randomised trial. We hypothesised that ORC would result in a faster haemodynamic and respiratory post‐anaesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery compared to iRARC. Methods This study is a predefined sub‐analysis of a single‐centre, double‐blinded, randomised feasibility study. Fifty bladder cancer patients were randomly assigned to ORC (n = 25) or iRARC (n = 25). Patients, PACU staff, and ward personnel were blinded to the surgical technique. Both randomisation arms followed the same anaesthesiologic procedure, fluid treatment plan, and PACU care. The primary outcome was immediate postoperative recovery using a standardised PACU Discharge Criteria (PACU‐DC) score. Secondary outcomes included respiration‐ and arterial O2 saturation scores as well as perioperative interventions and recordings. Results All patients underwent the allocated treatment. The total PACU‐DC score was highest 6 h postoperatively with no difference in the total score between randomisation arms (p = 0.80). Both the ORC and iRARC groups maintained a mean respiration‐ and arterial O2 saturation score below 1 (out of 3) throughout PACU stay. The iRARC patients had significantly, but clinically acceptable, higher maximum airway pressure and arterial blood pressure, as well as lower minimum pH levels. The ORC group received significantly more opioids after extubation but marginally less analgesics in the PACU, compared to the iRARC group. Conclusions A prolonged Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum was well‐tolerated during iRARC, and immediate postoperative recovery was similar for ORC and iRARC patients.