The relationships between specific dynamic action, nutrient retention and feed conversion ratio in farmed freshwater Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

• Published in: Journal of fish biology 2023-03, Vol.102 (3), p.605-618
• Main Authors: Elvy, Jordan E., Symonds, Jane E., Hilton, Zoë, Walker, Seumas P., Tremblay, Louis A., Herbert, Neill A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Aquaculture; ballotini beads; Body composition; Body weight gain; Carnivorous animals; Conversion ratio; Correlation; Environment; Environmental impact; Feed conversion; feed conversion ratio; Feeds; Fish; Fish farms; Food conversion; Fresh Water; Freshwater; Freshwater fish; Freshwater fishes; Inland water environment; Lipids; Metabolic rate; Metabolism; Nutrient retention; Nutrients; Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; Operating costs; Phenotypes; Physical growth; Production costs; Radiography; respirometry; Salmon; Salmon - metabolism; specific dynamic action; Tissues; Weight; Weight gain; Weight Gain - genetics; Weight reduction
• ISSN: 0022-1112; 1095-8649
• DOI: 10.1111/jfb.15293

Improving the feed conversion ratio (FCR; the amount of feed consumed relative to the amount of weight gain) can reduce both production costs and environmental impacts of farmed fish. The aim of this study was to investigate what drives FCR to understand how nutrients are retained, as well as the amount of oxygen consumed for digestion, absorption and assimilation (a metabolic process known as specific dynamic action, SDA). Feed‐efficient and inefficient Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in fresh water were identified using ballotini beads and X‐radiography that tracked individual feed intake across three assessment periods under satiated feeding. This allowed a comparison of physiological traits and body composition between the two FCR phenotypes over two time points as Chinook salmon grew from 305 to 620 g. Fish with higher daily feed intake (DFI) had higher daily weight gain (DWG) as expected. Nonetheless, the relationship between FCR and DFI as well as FCR and DWG was variable between time points. FCR and DWG were not correlated at the first time point and were negatively correlated at the second time point. In contrast, FCR and DFI were positively correlated at the first time point but not the second. Despite this, efficient fish ate smaller meals and retained more protein, lipid and energy in their body tissues. There was no detectable difference in metabolism between the two FCR phenotypes with respect to minimal resting metabolic rate, maximum metabolic rate, aerobic scope, or SDA parameters. In conclusion, FCR is not consistently associated with growth and metabolic differences in freshwater Chinook salmon, but FCR‐efficient fish retain more nutrients and consume smaller meals.