Contribution of intracranial pressure to human dynamic cerebral autoregulation after acute brain injury

• Published in: American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology integrative and comparative physiology, 2023-02, Vol.324 (2), p.R216-R226
• Main Authors: Brasil, Sérgio, Nogueira, Ricardo C, Salinet, Angela S M, Yoshikawa, Márcia H, Teixeira, Manoel J, Paiva, Wellingson, Malbouisson, Luiz M S, Bor-Seng-Shu, Edson, Panerai, Ronney B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Blood flow; Blood pressure; Blood Pressure - physiology; Brain; Brain Injuries; Brain injury; Cerebral blood flow; Cerebrovascular Circulation - physiology; Compression; Fractures; Head injuries; Homeostasis - physiology; Humans; Intracranial pressure; Intracranial Pressure - physiology; Jugular vein; Neurosurgery; Skull; Traumatic brain injury; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial; Ultrasound
• ISSN: 0363-6119; 1522-1490
• DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00252.2022

Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is normally expressed by the difference between mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) but comparison of the separate contributions of MAP and ICP to human cerebral blood flow autoregulation has not been reported. In patients with acute brain injury (ABI), internal jugular vein compression (IJVC) was performed for 60 s. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) was assessed in recordings of middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, transcranial Doppler), and invasive measurements of MAP and ICP. Patients were separated according to injury severity as having whole/undamaged skull, large fractures, or craniotomies, or following decompressive craniectomy. Glasgow coma score was not different for the three groups. IJVC induced changes in MCAv, MAP, ICP, and CPP in all three groups. The MCAv response to step changes in MAP and ICP expressed the dCA response to these two inputs and was quantified with the autoregulation index (ARI). In 85 patients, ARI was lower for the ICP input as compared with the MAP input (2.25 ± 2.46 vs. 3.39 ± 2.28; < 0.0001), and particularly depressed in the decompressive craniectomy (DC) group ( = 24, 0.35 ± 0.62 vs. 2.21 ± 1.96; < 0.0005). In patients with ABI, the dCA response to changes in ICP is less efficient than corresponding responses to MAP changes. These results should be taken into consideration in studies aimed to optimize dCA by manipulation of CPP in neurocritical patients.