Loading…

Zero-rating and prioritization in Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Rawlsian perspective on net neutrality

In recent years two business practices, namely zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR), have been widely discussed and debated. The debate is mostly built around the idea that these two practices violate the so-called net neutrality (NN) principle, which requires that all Internet data packages are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Technological forecasting & social change 2023-03, Vol.188, p.122293-122293, Article 122293
Main Authors: Klaser, Klaudijo, Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6d9f21aed82ff0ec546a450f6262ee7178ea9f95a97e76a0e85658274c378be53
container_end_page 122293
container_issue
container_start_page 122293
container_title Technological forecasting & social change
container_volume 188
creator Klaser, Klaudijo
Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados
description In recent years two business practices, namely zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR), have been widely discussed and debated. The debate is mostly built around the idea that these two practices violate the so-called net neutrality (NN) principle, which requires that all Internet data packages are treated equally. There is no unanimous consensus among scholars about NN and the adopted regulations are heterogeneous across countries, variable over time, and often contentious. In any case, the current judgements and regulations do not take into consideration exceptional circumstances, like the Covid-19 pandemic, in which an Internet connection becomes essential to carry on fundamental socio-economic activities. Focusing on the European case, in this paper we claim that, in a context such as a global pandemic, the practices of ZR and PR have to be re-examined. We do so through the perspective of the social contract theory developed by John Rawls. Our main conclusion is that, during a conjunctural crisis, where an Internet connection becomes an essential tool, ZR and PP should both be allowed. Our contribution goes towards the direction of adding a provisio to the standard European Internet regulation, allowing ZR and PR in specific contexts. •The Covid-19 pandemic brought the Internet neutrality further up on the list of the most important public debates•The European Union has one of the strictest interpretations of the net neutrality (NN) principle•We reexamined zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR) through the perspective of the social contract theory of John Rawls•We propose a provisio to the standard European Internet regulation, allowing ZR and PR in specific contexts
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122293
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2760168920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040162522008149</els_id><sourcerecordid>2760168920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6d9f21aed82ff0ec546a450f6262ee7178ea9f95a97e76a0e85658274c378be53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLHDEQx0Ox6NX6FSSPfdnrJLkkmz5VDrUFQRB96UuI2dmaY2-zTbIn-umb47SvfRgGht9_hvkRcs5gyYCpr5tlQf_Ux4RLDpwvGefciA9kwVotGinBHJEFwAoaprg8IZ9y3gCAFq06JidCSQMg5ILEX5hik1wJ42_qxo5OKcQUSnitozjSMNLLOcUJaTenPVOekK7jLnQNM3SqCdwG_406eueehxzcSCdMeUJfwg5p3TBiqTWX5IZQXj6Tj70bMp699VPycHV5v_7R3Nxe_1xf3DReKFEa1ZmeM4ddy_se0MuVcisJveKKI2qmW3SmN9IZjVo5wFYq2XK98kK3jyjFKfly2Dul-GfGXOw2ZI_D4EaMc7Zcq6qxNRwqqg6oTzHnhL2tDrYuvVgGdi_bbuy7bLuXbQ-ya_D87cb8uMXuX-zdbgW-HwCsn-4CJpt9wNFjF1IVZLsY_nfjL5polJo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2760168920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zero-rating and prioritization in Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Rawlsian perspective on net neutrality</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Klaser, Klaudijo ; Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados</creator><creatorcontrib>Klaser, Klaudijo ; Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years two business practices, namely zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR), have been widely discussed and debated. The debate is mostly built around the idea that these two practices violate the so-called net neutrality (NN) principle, which requires that all Internet data packages are treated equally. There is no unanimous consensus among scholars about NN and the adopted regulations are heterogeneous across countries, variable over time, and often contentious. In any case, the current judgements and regulations do not take into consideration exceptional circumstances, like the Covid-19 pandemic, in which an Internet connection becomes essential to carry on fundamental socio-economic activities. Focusing on the European case, in this paper we claim that, in a context such as a global pandemic, the practices of ZR and PR have to be re-examined. We do so through the perspective of the social contract theory developed by John Rawls. Our main conclusion is that, during a conjunctural crisis, where an Internet connection becomes an essential tool, ZR and PP should both be allowed. Our contribution goes towards the direction of adding a provisio to the standard European Internet regulation, allowing ZR and PR in specific contexts. •The Covid-19 pandemic brought the Internet neutrality further up on the list of the most important public debates•The European Union has one of the strictest interpretations of the net neutrality (NN) principle•We reexamined zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR) through the perspective of the social contract theory of John Rawls•We propose a provisio to the standard European Internet regulation, allowing ZR and PR in specific contexts</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-1625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5509</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122293</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36590035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Covid-19 ; European Union ; Internet ; John Rawls ; Net neutrality ; Prioritization ; Zero-rating</subject><ispartof>Technological forecasting &amp; social change, 2023-03, Vol.188, p.122293-122293, Article 122293</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6d9f21aed82ff0ec546a450f6262ee7178ea9f95a97e76a0e85658274c378be53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klaser, Klaudijo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados</creatorcontrib><title>Zero-rating and prioritization in Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Rawlsian perspective on net neutrality</title><title>Technological forecasting &amp; social change</title><addtitle>Technol Forecast Soc Change</addtitle><description>In recent years two business practices, namely zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR), have been widely discussed and debated. The debate is mostly built around the idea that these two practices violate the so-called net neutrality (NN) principle, which requires that all Internet data packages are treated equally. There is no unanimous consensus among scholars about NN and the adopted regulations are heterogeneous across countries, variable over time, and often contentious. In any case, the current judgements and regulations do not take into consideration exceptional circumstances, like the Covid-19 pandemic, in which an Internet connection becomes essential to carry on fundamental socio-economic activities. Focusing on the European case, in this paper we claim that, in a context such as a global pandemic, the practices of ZR and PR have to be re-examined. We do so through the perspective of the social contract theory developed by John Rawls. Our main conclusion is that, during a conjunctural crisis, where an Internet connection becomes an essential tool, ZR and PP should both be allowed. Our contribution goes towards the direction of adding a provisio to the standard European Internet regulation, allowing ZR and PR in specific contexts. •The Covid-19 pandemic brought the Internet neutrality further up on the list of the most important public debates•The European Union has one of the strictest interpretations of the net neutrality (NN) principle•We reexamined zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR) through the perspective of the social contract theory of John Rawls•We propose a provisio to the standard European Internet regulation, allowing ZR and PR in specific contexts</description><subject>Covid-19</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>John Rawls</subject><subject>Net neutrality</subject><subject>Prioritization</subject><subject>Zero-rating</subject><issn>0040-1625</issn><issn>1873-5509</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkFFLHDEQx0Ox6NX6FSSPfdnrJLkkmz5VDrUFQRB96UuI2dmaY2-zTbIn-umb47SvfRgGht9_hvkRcs5gyYCpr5tlQf_Ux4RLDpwvGefciA9kwVotGinBHJEFwAoaprg8IZ9y3gCAFq06JidCSQMg5ILEX5hik1wJ42_qxo5OKcQUSnitozjSMNLLOcUJaTenPVOekK7jLnQNM3SqCdwG_406eueehxzcSCdMeUJfwg5p3TBiqTWX5IZQXj6Tj70bMp699VPycHV5v_7R3Nxe_1xf3DReKFEa1ZmeM4ddy_se0MuVcisJveKKI2qmW3SmN9IZjVo5wFYq2XK98kK3jyjFKfly2Dul-GfGXOw2ZI_D4EaMc7Zcq6qxNRwqqg6oTzHnhL2tDrYuvVgGdi_bbuy7bLuXbQ-ya_D87cb8uMXuX-zdbgW-HwCsn-4CJpt9wNFjF1IVZLsY_nfjL5polJo</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Klaser, Klaudijo</creator><creator>Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Zero-rating and prioritization in Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Rawlsian perspective on net neutrality</title><author>Klaser, Klaudijo ; Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6d9f21aed82ff0ec546a450f6262ee7178ea9f95a97e76a0e85658274c378be53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Covid-19</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>John Rawls</topic><topic>Net neutrality</topic><topic>Prioritization</topic><topic>Zero-rating</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klaser, Klaudijo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Technological forecasting &amp; social change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klaser, Klaudijo</au><au>Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zero-rating and prioritization in Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Rawlsian perspective on net neutrality</atitle><jtitle>Technological forecasting &amp; social change</jtitle><addtitle>Technol Forecast Soc Change</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>188</volume><spage>122293</spage><epage>122293</epage><pages>122293-122293</pages><artnum>122293</artnum><issn>0040-1625</issn><eissn>1873-5509</eissn><abstract>In recent years two business practices, namely zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR), have been widely discussed and debated. The debate is mostly built around the idea that these two practices violate the so-called net neutrality (NN) principle, which requires that all Internet data packages are treated equally. There is no unanimous consensus among scholars about NN and the adopted regulations are heterogeneous across countries, variable over time, and often contentious. In any case, the current judgements and regulations do not take into consideration exceptional circumstances, like the Covid-19 pandemic, in which an Internet connection becomes essential to carry on fundamental socio-economic activities. Focusing on the European case, in this paper we claim that, in a context such as a global pandemic, the practices of ZR and PR have to be re-examined. We do so through the perspective of the social contract theory developed by John Rawls. Our main conclusion is that, during a conjunctural crisis, where an Internet connection becomes an essential tool, ZR and PP should both be allowed. Our contribution goes towards the direction of adding a provisio to the standard European Internet regulation, allowing ZR and PR in specific contexts. •The Covid-19 pandemic brought the Internet neutrality further up on the list of the most important public debates•The European Union has one of the strictest interpretations of the net neutrality (NN) principle•We reexamined zero-rating (ZR) and prioritization (PR) through the perspective of the social contract theory of John Rawls•We propose a provisio to the standard European Internet regulation, allowing ZR and PR in specific contexts</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36590035</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122293</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-1625
ispartof Technological forecasting & social change, 2023-03, Vol.188, p.122293-122293, Article 122293
issn 0040-1625
1873-5509
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2760168920
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Covid-19
European Union
Internet
John Rawls
Net neutrality
Prioritization
Zero-rating
title Zero-rating and prioritization in Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Rawlsian perspective on net neutrality
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A15%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zero-rating%20and%20prioritization%20in%20Europe%20during%20the%20Covid-19%20pandemic:%20a%20Rawlsian%20perspective%20on%20net%20neutrality&rft.jtitle=Technological%20forecasting%20&%20social%20change&rft.au=Klaser,%20Klaudijo&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=188&rft.spage=122293&rft.epage=122293&rft.pages=122293-122293&rft.artnum=122293&rft.issn=0040-1625&rft.eissn=1873-5509&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2760168920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-6d9f21aed82ff0ec546a450f6262ee7178ea9f95a97e76a0e85658274c378be53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2760168920&rft_id=info:pmid/36590035&rfr_iscdi=true