The Brazilian version of the work role functioning questionnaire 2.0 with 5 items (WRFQ-5) has adequate measurement properties

The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 (WRFQ 2.0) is an important instrument within the context of occupational health, consisting of 27 items and 5 domains. In addition, a short version of WRFQ 2.0 with 5 items (WRFQ-5) was proposed, showing agreement with the long version. Thus, we aimed to c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiotherapy theory and practice 2024-04, Vol.40 (4), p.880-886
Main Authors: Pinto Melo, Josane Soares, Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira, Brito Pinheiro, Cezar Augusto, Rêgo, Adriana Sousa, Bezerrade Castro Soares, Karla Virgínia, Brito Damasceno, Karen Larissa, Pontes-Silva, André, Fidelis de Paula Gomes, Cid André, Arias Avila, Mariana, Bassi-Dibai, Daniela
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adequacy
Brazil
Brazilian Portuguese
Confirmatory factor analysis
Humans
Measurement
Occupational Health
Occupational roles
Pain
Psychometrics - methods
Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Test-Retest reliability
Validity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 (WRFQ 2.0) is an important instrument within the context of occupational health, consisting of 27 items and 5 domains. In addition, a short version of WRFQ 2.0 with 5 items (WRFQ-5) was proposed, showing agreement with the long version. Thus, we aimed to confirm the number of factors of the WRFQ-5 short version and to verify the structural, construct, and criterion validity, reliability, internal consistency, and analysis of ceiling and floor effects of the Brazilian version of the WRFQ-5 in a general workers population. A questionnaire validation and measurement properties study. We evaluated the internal structure of the WRFQ-5 by means of confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the WRFQ-5 with the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Work Ability Index (WAI), and Self-Estimated Functional Inability because of Pain (SEFIP-work). Criterion validity was assessed by correlating the WRFQ-5 with the 5 domains of the WRFQ 2.0. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were also evaluated. We observed positive correlations (p 
ISSN:0959-3985
1532-5040
DOI:10.1080/09593985.2022.2163211