Loading…

Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques

Purpose The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique. Methods An analysis was carried out of 38 patients im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2023-06, Vol.280 (6), p.2749-2754
Main Authors: Miura, Mauricio Schneider, Ogando, Patrícia Barcelos, Pasqualini, Marina Paese, Neves, Hemily, Lubianca Neto, José Faibes
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique. Methods An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department. Results The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82; p  = 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques. Conclusions The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications.
ISSN:0937-4477
1434-4726
DOI:10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w