Loading…
Surgical results of transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid comparing the C-shaped and linear incision techniques
Purpose The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique. Methods An analysis was carried out of 38 patients im...
Saved in:
Published in: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2023-06, Vol.280 (6), p.2749-2754 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The aim of the study is to compare the operative time and postoperative complication outcomes for bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implants using two different techniques: the C-shaped incision technique and the linear incision technique.
Methods
An analysis was carried out of 38 patients implanted with transcutaneous BAHAs during a 4-year period in a single otolaryngology department.
Results
The implantation was carried out under general anesthesia. Operative time was significant lower with the linear technique compared to the C-shaped technique (76.55 min, SD 16.75 vs. 93.17 min, SD 19.82;
p
= 0.007). There was no difference in postoperative complications between the two techniques.
Conclusions
The use of linear incision for transcutaneous BAHA system implantation is associated with a reduced surgery time compared to the C-shaped technique, with no increase in postoperative complications. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0937-4477 1434-4726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00405-022-07778-w |