Multipulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex produces short-latency corticomotor facilitation via two distinct mechanisms

• Published in: Journal of neurophysiology 2023-02, Vol.129 (2), p.410-420
• Main Authors: Kesselheim, Janine, Takemi, Mitsuaki, Christiansen, Lasse, Karabanov, Anke Ninija, Siebner, Hartwig Roman
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Electromyography; Evoked Potentials, Motor - physiology; Humans; Interneurons; Motor Cortex - physiology; Motor Neurons; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Pyramidal Tracts; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
• ISSN: 0022-3077; 1522-1598
• DOI: 10.1152/jn.00263.2022

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the precentral hand representation (M1 ) can elicit indirect waves in the corticospinal tract at a periodicity of ∼660 Hz, called I-waves. These descending volleys are produced by transsynaptic excitation of fast-conducting corticospinal axons in M1 . Paired-pulse TMS can induce short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at interpulse intervals that match I-wave periodicity. This study examined whether short-latency corticospinal facilitation engages additional mechanisms independently of I-wave periodicity. In 19 volunteers, one to four biphasic TMS pulses were applied to left M1 with interpulse intervals adjusted to the first peak or trough of the individual SICF curve at different intensities to probe the intensity-response relationship. Multipulse TMS at individual peak latency facilitated MEP amplitudes and reduced resting motor threshold (RMT) compared with single pulses. Multipulse TMS at individual trough latency also produced a consistent facilitation of MEPs and a reduction of RMT. Short-latency facilitation at trough latency was less pronounced, but the relative difference in facilitation decreased with increasing stimulus intensity. Increasing the pulse number had only a modest effect. Two mechanisms underlie short-latency facilitation caused by biphasic multipulse TMS . One intracortical mechanism is related to I-wave periodicity and engages fast-conducting direct projections to spinal motoneurons. A second corticospinal mechanism does not rely on I-wave rhythmicity and may be mediated by slower-conducting indirect pyramidal tract projections from M1 to spinal interneurons. The latter mechanism deserves more attention in studies of the corticomotor system and its link to manual motor control using the MEP. TMS pairs evoke SICF at interpulse intervals (IPIs) that match I-wave periodicity. Biphasic bursts with IPIs at the latency of the first peak facilitate MEPs and reduce corticomotor threshold. Bursts at the latency of the first trough facilitate MEPs and reduce corticomotor threshold to a lesser extent. TMS bursts facilitate corticomotor excitability via two mechanisms: SICF-dependently via fast-conducting direct projections from M1 to spinal motoneurons and SICF-independently, probably through slower-conducting indirect pyramidal tract projections.