Loading…
Parametric investigation of a double-effect solar still in comparison with a single-effect solar still
This paper reports the use of two mathematical models to compare the productivity of single-effect and double-effect solar stills under different climatic, design and operational parameters in Oman. The shallow water basin, 23° cover tilt angle, 0.1 m insulation thickness, and asphalt coating of the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Desalination 2002-10, Vol.150 (1), p.75-83 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This paper reports the use of two mathematical models to compare the productivity of single-effect and double-effect solar stills under different climatic, design and operational parameters in Oman. The shallow water basin, 23° cover tilt angle, 0.1 m insulation thickness, and asphalt coating of the solar still were found to be the optimum design parameters that produced an average annual solar still yield of 4.15 kg/m
2/d and 6 kg/m
2/d for single and double effect solar stills, respectively. A cost analysis is carried out to shed some light on the potential of utilizing an array of single-effect solar stills or double-effect solar stills for the production of drinking water in remote areas in Oman. It has been found that the unit cost for distilled water using an array of single-effect solar stills is $74/1000 gal (16.3 $/m
3) or $62.4/1000 gal (13.7 $/m
3) when using a double-effect solar still. The cost saving is 15.7%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0011-9164 1873-4464 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00931-1 |