Loading…
Differential effects of executive load on automatic versus controlled semantic memory retrieval
Growing evidence indicates that a domain-general executive control supports semantic memory retrieval, yet the nature of this interaction remains elusive. To shed light on such control mechanisms, we conducted two dual-task experiments loading distinct executive capacities (working memory maintenanc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Memory & cognition 2023-07, Vol.51 (5), p.1145-1158 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8dcd184539917a51e8031a78ba15cdd2cf5af6d19472b487858b270a72f043ce3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8dcd184539917a51e8031a78ba15cdd2cf5af6d19472b487858b270a72f043ce3 |
container_end_page | 1158 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1145 |
container_title | Memory & cognition |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Marko, Martin Riečanský, Igor |
description | Growing evidence indicates that a domain-general executive control supports semantic memory retrieval, yet the nature of this interaction remains elusive. To shed light on such control mechanisms, we conducted two dual-task experiments loading distinct executive capacities (working memory maintenance, monitoring, and switching), while participants carried out automatic (free-associative) and controlled (dissociative) word retrieval tasks. We found that these forms of executive load interfered with retrieval fluency in both tasks, but these negative effects were more pronounced for the dissociative performance. Together, these findings indicate that the domain-general executive control supports accessing contextually relevant knowledge as well as the inhibition of automatically activated but task-inappropriate retrieval candidates, putatively via an adaptive gating of semantic activation and interference control. Moreover, the processing costs related to retrieval inhibition and switching were negatively correlated, suggesting a trade-off between the ability to constrain semantic activation (i.e., inhibition) and the ability to initiate flexible transitions between semantic sets (i.e., switching), which may thus represent two complementary control functions governing semantic memory retrieval. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13421-022-01388-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2766719178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2766719178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8dcd184539917a51e8031a78ba15cdd2cf5af6d19472b487858b270a72f043ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4Mouj6-gAcJePFSzaN59Ci-YcGLgreQTadSaZs1SZfdb290VwUPnmZgfvOf4YfQMSXnXAl9ESkvGS0IYwWhXOtiuYUmVHBWiKqU22hCSEUKQdjLHtqP8Y0QIkQld9Eel1IQXuoJMtdt00CAIbW2w5B7lyL2DYYluDG1C8CdtzX2A7Zj8r1NrcMLCHGM2PkhBd91UOMIvR0-Rz30PqxwgBRaWNjuEO00totwtKkH6Pn25unqvpg-3j1cXU4LV9IqFbp2NdWl4FVFlRUUNOHUKj2zVLi6Zq4RtpE1rUrFZqVWWugZU8Qq1pCSO-AH6GydOw_-fYSYTN9GB11nB_BjNExJqWgO1xk9_YO--TEM-TvDNNMVFULKTLE15YKPMUBj5qHtbVgZSsynfrPWb7J-86XfLPPSySZ6nPVQ_6x8-84AXwMxj4ZXCL-3_4n9APEDkZc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2828915566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential effects of executive load on automatic versus controlled semantic memory retrieval</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Marko, Martin ; Riečanský, Igor</creator><creatorcontrib>Marko, Martin ; Riečanský, Igor</creatorcontrib><description>Growing evidence indicates that a domain-general executive control supports semantic memory retrieval, yet the nature of this interaction remains elusive. To shed light on such control mechanisms, we conducted two dual-task experiments loading distinct executive capacities (working memory maintenance, monitoring, and switching), while participants carried out automatic (free-associative) and controlled (dissociative) word retrieval tasks. We found that these forms of executive load interfered with retrieval fluency in both tasks, but these negative effects were more pronounced for the dissociative performance. Together, these findings indicate that the domain-general executive control supports accessing contextually relevant knowledge as well as the inhibition of automatically activated but task-inappropriate retrieval candidates, putatively via an adaptive gating of semantic activation and interference control. Moreover, the processing costs related to retrieval inhibition and switching were negatively correlated, suggesting a trade-off between the ability to constrain semantic activation (i.e., inhibition) and the ability to initiate flexible transitions between semantic sets (i.e., switching), which may thus represent two complementary control functions governing semantic memory retrieval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01388-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36650348</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Executive function ; Executive Function - physiology ; Experiments ; Humans ; Inhibition, Psychological ; Knowledge ; Maintenance costs ; Memory ; Memory, Short-Term ; Psychology ; Semantics ; Short term memory ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Memory & cognition, 2023-07, Vol.51 (5), p.1145-1158</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jul 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8dcd184539917a51e8031a78ba15cdd2cf5af6d19472b487858b270a72f043ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8dcd184539917a51e8031a78ba15cdd2cf5af6d19472b487858b270a72f043ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1473-1616</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2828915566/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2828915566?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,36060,36061,43733,44363,74221,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36650348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marko, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riečanský, Igor</creatorcontrib><title>Differential effects of executive load on automatic versus controlled semantic memory retrieval</title><title>Memory & cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>Growing evidence indicates that a domain-general executive control supports semantic memory retrieval, yet the nature of this interaction remains elusive. To shed light on such control mechanisms, we conducted two dual-task experiments loading distinct executive capacities (working memory maintenance, monitoring, and switching), while participants carried out automatic (free-associative) and controlled (dissociative) word retrieval tasks. We found that these forms of executive load interfered with retrieval fluency in both tasks, but these negative effects were more pronounced for the dissociative performance. Together, these findings indicate that the domain-general executive control supports accessing contextually relevant knowledge as well as the inhibition of automatically activated but task-inappropriate retrieval candidates, putatively via an adaptive gating of semantic activation and interference control. Moreover, the processing costs related to retrieval inhibition and switching were negatively correlated, suggesting a trade-off between the ability to constrain semantic activation (i.e., inhibition) and the ability to initiate flexible transitions between semantic sets (i.e., switching), which may thus represent two complementary control functions governing semantic memory retrieval.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Executive Function - physiology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition, Psychological</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Maintenance costs</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4Mouj6-gAcJePFSzaN59Ci-YcGLgreQTadSaZs1SZfdb290VwUPnmZgfvOf4YfQMSXnXAl9ESkvGS0IYwWhXOtiuYUmVHBWiKqU22hCSEUKQdjLHtqP8Y0QIkQld9Eel1IQXuoJMtdt00CAIbW2w5B7lyL2DYYluDG1C8CdtzX2A7Zj8r1NrcMLCHGM2PkhBd91UOMIvR0-Rz30PqxwgBRaWNjuEO00totwtKkH6Pn25unqvpg-3j1cXU4LV9IqFbp2NdWl4FVFlRUUNOHUKj2zVLi6Zq4RtpE1rUrFZqVWWugZU8Qq1pCSO-AH6GydOw_-fYSYTN9GB11nB_BjNExJqWgO1xk9_YO--TEM-TvDNNMVFULKTLE15YKPMUBj5qHtbVgZSsynfrPWb7J-86XfLPPSySZ6nPVQ_6x8-84AXwMxj4ZXCL-3_4n9APEDkZc</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Marko, Martin</creator><creator>Riečanský, Igor</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-1616</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Differential effects of executive load on automatic versus controlled semantic memory retrieval</title><author>Marko, Martin ; Riečanský, Igor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8dcd184539917a51e8031a78ba15cdd2cf5af6d19472b487858b270a72f043ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Executive Function - physiology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition, Psychological</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Maintenance costs</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marko, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riečanský, Igor</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marko, Martin</au><au>Riečanský, Igor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential effects of executive load on automatic versus controlled semantic memory retrieval</atitle><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle><stitle>Mem Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1145</spage><epage>1158</epage><pages>1145-1158</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><abstract>Growing evidence indicates that a domain-general executive control supports semantic memory retrieval, yet the nature of this interaction remains elusive. To shed light on such control mechanisms, we conducted two dual-task experiments loading distinct executive capacities (working memory maintenance, monitoring, and switching), while participants carried out automatic (free-associative) and controlled (dissociative) word retrieval tasks. We found that these forms of executive load interfered with retrieval fluency in both tasks, but these negative effects were more pronounced for the dissociative performance. Together, these findings indicate that the domain-general executive control supports accessing contextually relevant knowledge as well as the inhibition of automatically activated but task-inappropriate retrieval candidates, putatively via an adaptive gating of semantic activation and interference control. Moreover, the processing costs related to retrieval inhibition and switching were negatively correlated, suggesting a trade-off between the ability to constrain semantic activation (i.e., inhibition) and the ability to initiate flexible transitions between semantic sets (i.e., switching), which may thus represent two complementary control functions governing semantic memory retrieval.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36650348</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13421-022-01388-x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1473-1616</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-502X |
ispartof | Memory & cognition, 2023-07, Vol.51 (5), p.1145-1158 |
issn | 0090-502X 1532-5946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2766719178 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Executive function Executive Function - physiology Experiments Humans Inhibition, Psychological Knowledge Maintenance costs Memory Memory, Short-Term Psychology Semantics Short term memory Variance analysis |
title | Differential effects of executive load on automatic versus controlled semantic memory retrieval |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A29%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20effects%20of%20executive%20load%20on%20automatic%20versus%20controlled%20semantic%20memory%20retrieval&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Marko,%20Martin&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1145&rft.epage=1158&rft.pages=1145-1158&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13421-022-01388-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2766719178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-8dcd184539917a51e8031a78ba15cdd2cf5af6d19472b487858b270a72f043ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2828915566&rft_id=info:pmid/36650348&rfr_iscdi=true |