Loading…
Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population
Abstract Background Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and u...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of applied laboratory medicine 2023-03, Vol.8 (2), p.264-271 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3 |
container_end_page | 271 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 264 |
container_title | The journal of applied laboratory medicine |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Kirchhoff, Daniel Baser, Raymond Kwong, David Ramanathan, Lakshmi McCash, Samuel I |
description | Abstract
Background
Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and unique bevel configuration, which in theory should reduce pain associated with phlebotomy. Smaller needles typically cause less pain, however, they have a higher incidence of compromising the specimen integrity. Innovative engineering allows this particular needle to maintain a larger inner bore size similar to a standard 23-gauge needle. This study compares pain and specimen integrity between this novel device and a standard 23-gauge needle.
Methods
Two cohorts of 190 patients each had phlebotomy performed with either needle. Pain experienced was assessed by patient surveys, rating pain from 0 (low) to 10 (high). Sample integrity was assessed by determining the hemolysis index (Abbott Architect c8000).
Results
No statistically significant difference in median pain scores was observed between the 2 cohorts, P-value: 0.068. The 23-gauge cohort more frequently reported 3+ pain than the 25-gauge cohort, 14/190 vs 5/190. Pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort, 84/190 vs 54/190. Pain scores of 0 were more frequent in the 23-gauge cohort, 122/190 vs 101/190. This stratification is statistically significant, P-value: 0.003. The 25-gauge needle showed no increase in hemolysis rates, P-value: 0.5.
Conclusions
Sample integrity was identical between both needles. The 25-gauge needle resulted in less 3+ pain, while pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jalm/jfac129 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2768238234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jalm/jfac129</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2768238234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1L3UAUhodiqWLddV1mVxeNzkdykiw1WBVEL6h0GU4mJ5rLJBMzE6G_wr_cudzbghthYIY5z_sszsvYNylOpCj16RrtcLru0EhVfmIHKs2zJFep3IvvLIekTDPYZ0fer4UQslAAWnxh-xqgEFpmB-ytcsOEc-_dyF3Hkd-6V7L84bkfk99oLbVcZckTLk_Eb4laS3y1-Gd-voQQI-fWuZZXLoIm9PHjngIPLnruA44tzjGu38f7MU4rHA3NfIWhpzHwlZsWixvBV_a5Q-vpaHcfssdfFw_VVXJzd3ldnd0kRhUiJAqKLFemScsG8rRRbYsNig7LVmRgoCmgzEBp3QHlkBKQKFDJMg6hMVqSPmTHW-80u5eFfKiH3huyFkdyi69VDoXS8aQR_blFzey8n6mrp7kfcP5TS1FvWqg3LdS7FiL-fWdemoHa__C_nUfgxxZwy_Sx6i9cJpCF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2768238234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Kirchhoff, Daniel ; Baser, Raymond ; Kwong, David ; Ramanathan, Lakshmi ; McCash, Samuel I</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirchhoff, Daniel ; Baser, Raymond ; Kwong, David ; Ramanathan, Lakshmi ; McCash, Samuel I</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and unique bevel configuration, which in theory should reduce pain associated with phlebotomy. Smaller needles typically cause less pain, however, they have a higher incidence of compromising the specimen integrity. Innovative engineering allows this particular needle to maintain a larger inner bore size similar to a standard 23-gauge needle. This study compares pain and specimen integrity between this novel device and a standard 23-gauge needle.
Methods
Two cohorts of 190 patients each had phlebotomy performed with either needle. Pain experienced was assessed by patient surveys, rating pain from 0 (low) to 10 (high). Sample integrity was assessed by determining the hemolysis index (Abbott Architect c8000).
Results
No statistically significant difference in median pain scores was observed between the 2 cohorts, P-value: 0.068. The 23-gauge cohort more frequently reported 3+ pain than the 25-gauge cohort, 14/190 vs 5/190. Pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort, 84/190 vs 54/190. Pain scores of 0 were more frequent in the 23-gauge cohort, 122/190 vs 101/190. This stratification is statistically significant, P-value: 0.003. The 25-gauge needle showed no increase in hemolysis rates, P-value: 0.5.
Conclusions
Sample integrity was identical between both needles. The 25-gauge needle resulted in less 3+ pain, while pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2576-9456</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2475-7241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-7241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfac129</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36680315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Hemolysis ; Humans ; Needles - adverse effects ; Neoplasms - complications ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Pain - diagnosis ; Pain - etiology ; Phlebotomy - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 2023-03, Vol.8 (2), p.264-271</ispartof><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1644-4090</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680315$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirchhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baser, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Lakshmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCash, Samuel I</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population</title><title>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>J Appl Lab Med</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and unique bevel configuration, which in theory should reduce pain associated with phlebotomy. Smaller needles typically cause less pain, however, they have a higher incidence of compromising the specimen integrity. Innovative engineering allows this particular needle to maintain a larger inner bore size similar to a standard 23-gauge needle. This study compares pain and specimen integrity between this novel device and a standard 23-gauge needle.
Methods
Two cohorts of 190 patients each had phlebotomy performed with either needle. Pain experienced was assessed by patient surveys, rating pain from 0 (low) to 10 (high). Sample integrity was assessed by determining the hemolysis index (Abbott Architect c8000).
Results
No statistically significant difference in median pain scores was observed between the 2 cohorts, P-value: 0.068. The 23-gauge cohort more frequently reported 3+ pain than the 25-gauge cohort, 14/190 vs 5/190. Pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort, 84/190 vs 54/190. Pain scores of 0 were more frequent in the 23-gauge cohort, 122/190 vs 101/190. This stratification is statistically significant, P-value: 0.003. The 25-gauge needle showed no increase in hemolysis rates, P-value: 0.5.
Conclusions
Sample integrity was identical between both needles. The 25-gauge needle resulted in less 3+ pain, while pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort.</description><subject>Hemolysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Needles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Phlebotomy - adverse effects</subject><issn>2576-9456</issn><issn>2475-7241</issn><issn>2475-7241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1L3UAUhodiqWLddV1mVxeNzkdykiw1WBVEL6h0GU4mJ5rLJBMzE6G_wr_cudzbghthYIY5z_sszsvYNylOpCj16RrtcLru0EhVfmIHKs2zJFep3IvvLIekTDPYZ0fer4UQslAAWnxh-xqgEFpmB-ytcsOEc-_dyF3Hkd-6V7L84bkfk99oLbVcZckTLk_Eb4laS3y1-Gd-voQQI-fWuZZXLoIm9PHjngIPLnruA44tzjGu38f7MU4rHA3NfIWhpzHwlZsWixvBV_a5Q-vpaHcfssdfFw_VVXJzd3ldnd0kRhUiJAqKLFemScsG8rRRbYsNig7LVmRgoCmgzEBp3QHlkBKQKFDJMg6hMVqSPmTHW-80u5eFfKiH3huyFkdyi69VDoXS8aQR_blFzey8n6mrp7kfcP5TS1FvWqg3LdS7FiL-fWdemoHa__C_nUfgxxZwy_Sx6i9cJpCF</recordid><startdate>20230306</startdate><enddate>20230306</enddate><creator>Kirchhoff, Daniel</creator><creator>Baser, Raymond</creator><creator>Kwong, David</creator><creator>Ramanathan, Lakshmi</creator><creator>McCash, Samuel I</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1644-4090</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230306</creationdate><title>Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population</title><author>Kirchhoff, Daniel ; Baser, Raymond ; Kwong, David ; Ramanathan, Lakshmi ; McCash, Samuel I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Hemolysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Needles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Phlebotomy - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirchhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baser, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Lakshmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCash, Samuel I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirchhoff, Daniel</au><au>Baser, Raymond</au><au>Kwong, David</au><au>Ramanathan, Lakshmi</au><au>McCash, Samuel I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population</atitle><jtitle>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Lab Med</addtitle><date>2023-03-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>264</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>264-271</pages><issn>2576-9456</issn><issn>2475-7241</issn><eissn>2475-7241</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and unique bevel configuration, which in theory should reduce pain associated with phlebotomy. Smaller needles typically cause less pain, however, they have a higher incidence of compromising the specimen integrity. Innovative engineering allows this particular needle to maintain a larger inner bore size similar to a standard 23-gauge needle. This study compares pain and specimen integrity between this novel device and a standard 23-gauge needle.
Methods
Two cohorts of 190 patients each had phlebotomy performed with either needle. Pain experienced was assessed by patient surveys, rating pain from 0 (low) to 10 (high). Sample integrity was assessed by determining the hemolysis index (Abbott Architect c8000).
Results
No statistically significant difference in median pain scores was observed between the 2 cohorts, P-value: 0.068. The 23-gauge cohort more frequently reported 3+ pain than the 25-gauge cohort, 14/190 vs 5/190. Pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort, 84/190 vs 54/190. Pain scores of 0 were more frequent in the 23-gauge cohort, 122/190 vs 101/190. This stratification is statistically significant, P-value: 0.003. The 25-gauge needle showed no increase in hemolysis rates, P-value: 0.5.
Conclusions
Sample integrity was identical between both needles. The 25-gauge needle resulted in less 3+ pain, while pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36680315</pmid><doi>10.1093/jalm/jfac129</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1644-4090</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2576-9456 |
ispartof | The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 2023-03, Vol.8 (2), p.264-271 |
issn | 2576-9456 2475-7241 2475-7241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2768238234 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Hemolysis Humans Needles - adverse effects Neoplasms - complications Neoplasms - therapy Pain - diagnosis Pain - etiology Phlebotomy - adverse effects |
title | Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A11%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20Novel%20Thin-Walled%2025-gauge%20Needle%20Push%20Button%20Blood%20Collection%20Set%20to%20a%20Standard%2023-gauge%20Needle%20in%20a%20Cancer%20Patient%20Population&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20applied%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Kirchhoff,%20Daniel&rft.date=2023-03-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=264&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=264-271&rft.issn=2576-9456&rft.eissn=2475-7241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jalm/jfac129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2768238234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2768238234&rft_id=info:pmid/36680315&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jalm/jfac129&rfr_iscdi=true |