Loading…

Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population

Abstract Background Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of applied laboratory medicine 2023-03, Vol.8 (2), p.264-271
Main Authors: Kirchhoff, Daniel, Baser, Raymond, Kwong, David, Ramanathan, Lakshmi, McCash, Samuel I
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3
container_end_page 271
container_issue 2
container_start_page 264
container_title The journal of applied laboratory medicine
container_volume 8
creator Kirchhoff, Daniel
Baser, Raymond
Kwong, David
Ramanathan, Lakshmi
McCash, Samuel I
description Abstract Background Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and unique bevel configuration, which in theory should reduce pain associated with phlebotomy. Smaller needles typically cause less pain, however, they have a higher incidence of compromising the specimen integrity. Innovative engineering allows this particular needle to maintain a larger inner bore size similar to a standard 23-gauge needle. This study compares pain and specimen integrity between this novel device and a standard 23-gauge needle. Methods Two cohorts of 190 patients each had phlebotomy performed with either needle. Pain experienced was assessed by patient surveys, rating pain from 0 (low) to 10 (high). Sample integrity was assessed by determining the hemolysis index (Abbott Architect c8000). Results No statistically significant difference in median pain scores was observed between the 2 cohorts, P-value: 0.068. The 23-gauge cohort more frequently reported 3+ pain than the 25-gauge cohort, 14/190 vs 5/190. Pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort, 84/190 vs 54/190. Pain scores of 0 were more frequent in the 23-gauge cohort, 122/190 vs 101/190. This stratification is statistically significant, P-value: 0.003. The 25-gauge needle showed no increase in hemolysis rates, P-value: 0.5. Conclusions Sample integrity was identical between both needles. The 25-gauge needle resulted in less 3+ pain, while pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jalm/jfac129
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2768238234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jalm/jfac129</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2768238234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1L3UAUhodiqWLddV1mVxeNzkdykiw1WBVEL6h0GU4mJ5rLJBMzE6G_wr_cudzbghthYIY5z_sszsvYNylOpCj16RrtcLru0EhVfmIHKs2zJFep3IvvLIekTDPYZ0fer4UQslAAWnxh-xqgEFpmB-ytcsOEc-_dyF3Hkd-6V7L84bkfk99oLbVcZckTLk_Eb4laS3y1-Gd-voQQI-fWuZZXLoIm9PHjngIPLnruA44tzjGu38f7MU4rHA3NfIWhpzHwlZsWixvBV_a5Q-vpaHcfssdfFw_VVXJzd3ldnd0kRhUiJAqKLFemScsG8rRRbYsNig7LVmRgoCmgzEBp3QHlkBKQKFDJMg6hMVqSPmTHW-80u5eFfKiH3huyFkdyi69VDoXS8aQR_blFzey8n6mrp7kfcP5TS1FvWqg3LdS7FiL-fWdemoHa__C_nUfgxxZwy_Sx6i9cJpCF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2768238234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Kirchhoff, Daniel ; Baser, Raymond ; Kwong, David ; Ramanathan, Lakshmi ; McCash, Samuel I</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirchhoff, Daniel ; Baser, Raymond ; Kwong, David ; Ramanathan, Lakshmi ; McCash, Samuel I</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and unique bevel configuration, which in theory should reduce pain associated with phlebotomy. Smaller needles typically cause less pain, however, they have a higher incidence of compromising the specimen integrity. Innovative engineering allows this particular needle to maintain a larger inner bore size similar to a standard 23-gauge needle. This study compares pain and specimen integrity between this novel device and a standard 23-gauge needle. Methods Two cohorts of 190 patients each had phlebotomy performed with either needle. Pain experienced was assessed by patient surveys, rating pain from 0 (low) to 10 (high). Sample integrity was assessed by determining the hemolysis index (Abbott Architect c8000). Results No statistically significant difference in median pain scores was observed between the 2 cohorts, P-value: 0.068. The 23-gauge cohort more frequently reported 3+ pain than the 25-gauge cohort, 14/190 vs 5/190. Pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort, 84/190 vs 54/190. Pain scores of 0 were more frequent in the 23-gauge cohort, 122/190 vs 101/190. This stratification is statistically significant, P-value: 0.003. The 25-gauge needle showed no increase in hemolysis rates, P-value: 0.5. Conclusions Sample integrity was identical between both needles. The 25-gauge needle resulted in less 3+ pain, while pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2576-9456</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2475-7241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-7241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfac129</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36680315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Hemolysis ; Humans ; Needles - adverse effects ; Neoplasms - complications ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Pain - diagnosis ; Pain - etiology ; Phlebotomy - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 2023-03, Vol.8 (2), p.264-271</ispartof><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><rights>American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2023. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1644-4090</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680315$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirchhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baser, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Lakshmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCash, Samuel I</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population</title><title>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</title><addtitle>J Appl Lab Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and unique bevel configuration, which in theory should reduce pain associated with phlebotomy. Smaller needles typically cause less pain, however, they have a higher incidence of compromising the specimen integrity. Innovative engineering allows this particular needle to maintain a larger inner bore size similar to a standard 23-gauge needle. This study compares pain and specimen integrity between this novel device and a standard 23-gauge needle. Methods Two cohorts of 190 patients each had phlebotomy performed with either needle. Pain experienced was assessed by patient surveys, rating pain from 0 (low) to 10 (high). Sample integrity was assessed by determining the hemolysis index (Abbott Architect c8000). Results No statistically significant difference in median pain scores was observed between the 2 cohorts, P-value: 0.068. The 23-gauge cohort more frequently reported 3+ pain than the 25-gauge cohort, 14/190 vs 5/190. Pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort, 84/190 vs 54/190. Pain scores of 0 were more frequent in the 23-gauge cohort, 122/190 vs 101/190. This stratification is statistically significant, P-value: 0.003. The 25-gauge needle showed no increase in hemolysis rates, P-value: 0.5. Conclusions Sample integrity was identical between both needles. The 25-gauge needle resulted in less 3+ pain, while pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort.</description><subject>Hemolysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Needles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Phlebotomy - adverse effects</subject><issn>2576-9456</issn><issn>2475-7241</issn><issn>2475-7241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1L3UAUhodiqWLddV1mVxeNzkdykiw1WBVEL6h0GU4mJ5rLJBMzE6G_wr_cudzbghthYIY5z_sszsvYNylOpCj16RrtcLru0EhVfmIHKs2zJFep3IvvLIekTDPYZ0fer4UQslAAWnxh-xqgEFpmB-ytcsOEc-_dyF3Hkd-6V7L84bkfk99oLbVcZckTLk_Eb4laS3y1-Gd-voQQI-fWuZZXLoIm9PHjngIPLnruA44tzjGu38f7MU4rHA3NfIWhpzHwlZsWixvBV_a5Q-vpaHcfssdfFw_VVXJzd3ldnd0kRhUiJAqKLFemScsG8rRRbYsNig7LVmRgoCmgzEBp3QHlkBKQKFDJMg6hMVqSPmTHW-80u5eFfKiH3huyFkdyi69VDoXS8aQR_blFzey8n6mrp7kfcP5TS1FvWqg3LdS7FiL-fWdemoHa__C_nUfgxxZwy_Sx6i9cJpCF</recordid><startdate>20230306</startdate><enddate>20230306</enddate><creator>Kirchhoff, Daniel</creator><creator>Baser, Raymond</creator><creator>Kwong, David</creator><creator>Ramanathan, Lakshmi</creator><creator>McCash, Samuel I</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1644-4090</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230306</creationdate><title>Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population</title><author>Kirchhoff, Daniel ; Baser, Raymond ; Kwong, David ; Ramanathan, Lakshmi ; McCash, Samuel I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Hemolysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Needles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Phlebotomy - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirchhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baser, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwong, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Lakshmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCash, Samuel I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirchhoff, Daniel</au><au>Baser, Raymond</au><au>Kwong, David</au><au>Ramanathan, Lakshmi</au><au>McCash, Samuel I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population</atitle><jtitle>The journal of applied laboratory medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Lab Med</addtitle><date>2023-03-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>264</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>264-271</pages><issn>2576-9456</issn><issn>2475-7241</issn><eissn>2475-7241</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Phlebotomy can be an uncomfortable and even painful experience that increases in likelihood in patients who require frequent blood draws, such as those with cancer. The 25-gauge BD Vacutainer® UltraTouch™ Push Button Blood Collection Set has a smaller outer bore needle size and unique bevel configuration, which in theory should reduce pain associated with phlebotomy. Smaller needles typically cause less pain, however, they have a higher incidence of compromising the specimen integrity. Innovative engineering allows this particular needle to maintain a larger inner bore size similar to a standard 23-gauge needle. This study compares pain and specimen integrity between this novel device and a standard 23-gauge needle. Methods Two cohorts of 190 patients each had phlebotomy performed with either needle. Pain experienced was assessed by patient surveys, rating pain from 0 (low) to 10 (high). Sample integrity was assessed by determining the hemolysis index (Abbott Architect c8000). Results No statistically significant difference in median pain scores was observed between the 2 cohorts, P-value: 0.068. The 23-gauge cohort more frequently reported 3+ pain than the 25-gauge cohort, 14/190 vs 5/190. Pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort, 84/190 vs 54/190. Pain scores of 0 were more frequent in the 23-gauge cohort, 122/190 vs 101/190. This stratification is statistically significant, P-value: 0.003. The 25-gauge needle showed no increase in hemolysis rates, P-value: 0.5. Conclusions Sample integrity was identical between both needles. The 25-gauge needle resulted in less 3+ pain, while pain scoring 1 and 2 was more frequent in the 25-gauge cohort.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>36680315</pmid><doi>10.1093/jalm/jfac129</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1644-4090</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2576-9456
ispartof The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 2023-03, Vol.8 (2), p.264-271
issn 2576-9456
2475-7241
2475-7241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2768238234
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Hemolysis
Humans
Needles - adverse effects
Neoplasms - complications
Neoplasms - therapy
Pain - diagnosis
Pain - etiology
Phlebotomy - adverse effects
title Comparison of a Novel Thin-Walled 25-gauge Needle Push Button Blood Collection Set to a Standard 23-gauge Needle in a Cancer Patient Population
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T13%3A11%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20Novel%20Thin-Walled%2025-gauge%20Needle%20Push%20Button%20Blood%20Collection%20Set%20to%20a%20Standard%2023-gauge%20Needle%20in%20a%20Cancer%20Patient%20Population&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20applied%20laboratory%20medicine&rft.au=Kirchhoff,%20Daniel&rft.date=2023-03-06&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=264&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=264-271&rft.issn=2576-9456&rft.eissn=2475-7241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jalm/jfac129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2768238234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-268572cb49b674b2ddaba0fa9d056c6b86956233f6e764e6e08a2190566bc31e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2768238234&rft_id=info:pmid/36680315&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jalm/jfac129&rfr_iscdi=true