SPECT and STE: Which one is better in incremental prognostic value over CCTA

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of cardiology 2023-04, Vol.377, p.20-21
Main Authors: Yang, Ao-Ling, Li, Li, Zhang, Zhao-Hui, Li, Xin-Xin, You, Xiao-Xue, Sun, Jin, Akram, Muhammad Farhan, Liu, Hai-Hua, Li, Shu-Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
CCTA
Coronary Angiography - methods
Humans
MPI
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Reproducibility of Results
Speckle tracking echocardiography
SPECT
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-6bb7e36db93d364e76022456f018155304d7f797d36cbef98e5187af301e2ea93
container_end_page 21
container_issue
container_start_page 20
container_title International journal of cardiology
container_volume 377
creator Yang, Ao-Ling
Li, Li
Zhang, Zhao-Hui
Li, Xin-Xin
You, Xiao-Xue
Sun, Jin
Akram, Muhammad Farhan
Liu, Hai-Hua
Li, Shu-Guo
description
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.01.030
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2768816880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527323000712</els_id><sourcerecordid>2768816880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-6bb7e36db93d364e76022456f018155304d7f797d36cbef98e5187af301e2ea93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQgIMobk7_A5E8-tKaNG3S-iCMMn_AQGEVH0OaXl1G186kHfjfm9Hpo3DHPeS7u9yH0DUlISWU321Cs9HKVmFEIhYSGhJGTtCUpiIOqEjiUzT1mAiSSLAJunBuQwiJsyw9RxPGeRrxjE7RcvW2yAus2gqvisU9_lgbvcZdC9g4XELfg8Wm9aEtbKHtVYN3tvtsO9cbjfeqGQB3ew_leTG_RGe1ahxcHesMvT8uivw5WL4-veTzZaAZpX3Ay1IA41WZsYrxGAQnURQnvCY0pUnCSFyJWmTCP-oS6iyFxF-lakYoRKAyNkO341z_la8BXC-3xmloGtVCNzgZCZ6m1CfxaDyi2nbOWajlzpqtst-SEnnwKDdy9CgPHiWh0nv0bTfHDUO5heqv6VecBx5GAPydewNWOm2g1VAZC7qXVWf-3_ADkT6DIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2768816880</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SPECT and STE: Which one is better in incremental prognostic value over CCTA</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yang, Ao-Ling ; Li, Li ; Zhang, Zhao-Hui ; Li, Xin-Xin ; You, Xiao-Xue ; Sun, Jin ; Akram, Muhammad Farhan ; Liu, Hai-Hua ; Li, Shu-Guo</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ao-Ling ; Li, Li ; Zhang, Zhao-Hui ; Li, Xin-Xin ; You, Xiao-Xue ; Sun, Jin ; Akram, Muhammad Farhan ; Liu, Hai-Hua ; Li, Shu-Guo</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.01.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36682691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>CCTA ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Humans ; MPI ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Speckle tracking echocardiography ; SPECT ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2023-04, Vol.377, p.20-21</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-6bb7e36db93d364e76022456f018155304d7f797d36cbef98e5187af301e2ea93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36682691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ao-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhao-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xin-Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Xiao-Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akram, Muhammad Farhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hai-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shu-Guo</creatorcontrib><title>SPECT and STE: Which one is better in incremental prognostic value over CCTA</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><subject>CCTA</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>MPI</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Speckle tracking echocardiography</subject><subject>SPECT</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQgIMobk7_A5E8-tKaNG3S-iCMMn_AQGEVH0OaXl1G186kHfjfm9Hpo3DHPeS7u9yH0DUlISWU321Cs9HKVmFEIhYSGhJGTtCUpiIOqEjiUzT1mAiSSLAJunBuQwiJsyw9RxPGeRrxjE7RcvW2yAus2gqvisU9_lgbvcZdC9g4XELfg8Wm9aEtbKHtVYN3tvtsO9cbjfeqGQB3ew_leTG_RGe1ahxcHesMvT8uivw5WL4-veTzZaAZpX3Ay1IA41WZsYrxGAQnURQnvCY0pUnCSFyJWmTCP-oS6iyFxF-lakYoRKAyNkO341z_la8BXC-3xmloGtVCNzgZCZ6m1CfxaDyi2nbOWajlzpqtst-SEnnwKDdy9CgPHiWh0nv0bTfHDUO5heqv6VecBx5GAPydewNWOm2g1VAZC7qXVWf-3_ADkT6DIA</recordid><startdate>20230415</startdate><enddate>20230415</enddate><creator>Yang, Ao-Ling</creator><creator>Li, Li</creator><creator>Zhang, Zhao-Hui</creator><creator>Li, Xin-Xin</creator><creator>You, Xiao-Xue</creator><creator>Sun, Jin</creator><creator>Akram, Muhammad Farhan</creator><creator>Liu, Hai-Hua</creator><creator>Li, Shu-Guo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230415</creationdate><title>SPECT and STE: Which one is better in incremental prognostic value over CCTA</title><author>Yang, Ao-Ling ; Li, Li ; Zhang, Zhao-Hui ; Li, Xin-Xin ; You, Xiao-Xue ; Sun, Jin ; Akram, Muhammad Farhan ; Liu, Hai-Hua ; Li, Shu-Guo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-6bb7e36db93d364e76022456f018155304d7f797d36cbef98e5187af301e2ea93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>CCTA</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>MPI</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Speckle tracking echocardiography</topic><topic>SPECT</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ao-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Zhao-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xin-Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Xiao-Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akram, Muhammad Farhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hai-Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shu-Guo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Ao-Ling</au><au>Li, Li</au><au>Zhang, Zhao-Hui</au><au>Li, Xin-Xin</au><au>You, Xiao-Xue</au><au>Sun, Jin</au><au>Akram, Muhammad Farhan</au><au>Liu, Hai-Hua</au><au>Li, Shu-Guo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SPECT and STE: Which one is better in incremental prognostic value over CCTA</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2023-04-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>377</volume><spage>20</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>20-21</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36682691</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.01.030</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5273
ispartof International journal of cardiology, 2023-04, Vol.377, p.20-21
issn 0167-5273
1874-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2768816880
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects CCTA
Coronary Angiography - methods
Humans
MPI
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Reproducibility of Results
Speckle tracking echocardiography
SPECT
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon - methods
title SPECT and STE: Which one is better in incremental prognostic value over CCTA
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A04%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SPECT%20and%20STE:%20Which%20one%20is%20better%20in%20incremental%20prognostic%20value%20over%20CCTA&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Yang,%20Ao-Ling&rft.date=2023-04-15&rft.volume=377&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=20-21&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.01.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2768816880%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-6bb7e36db93d364e76022456f018155304d7f797d36cbef98e5187af301e2ea93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2768816880&rft_id=info:pmid/36682691&rfr_iscdi=true