Comparison of the efficacy and safety of standard‐ and high‐dose daptomycin: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

• Published in: British journal of clinical pharmacology 2023-04, Vol.89 (4), p.1291-1303
• Main Authors: Samura, Masaru, Takada, Keisuke, Hirose, Naoki, Kurata, Takenori, Nagumo, Fumio, Uchida, Masaki, Inoue, Junki, Tanikawa, Koji, Enoki, Yuki, Taguchi, Kazuaki, Matsumoto, Kazuaki, Ueda, Takashi, Fujimura, Shigeru, Mikamo, Hiroshige, Takesue, Yoshio, Mitsutake, Kotaro
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects; Bacteremia - drug therapy; daptomycin; Daptomycin - adverse effects; efficacy; Endocarditis - chemically induced; Endocarditis - complications; Endocarditis - drug therapy; high dose; Humans; meta‐analysis; Osteomyelitis - chemically induced; Osteomyelitis - drug therapy; Retrospective Studies; safety; standard dose; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0306-5251; 1365-2125
• DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15671

Aims Standard doses of daptomycin at 4 and 6 mg/kg were used for the treatment of skin and soft tissue for infections and bacteraemia, respectively. However, increased doses of daptomycin are recommended for complicated infections by Gram‐positive organisms. Methods A systematic review was conducted using 4 databases. We compared treatment success between standard‐dose (SD, 4–6 mg/kg) and high‐dose (HD, >6 mg/kg) daptomycin in patients with all‐cause bacteraemia, complicated bacteraemia, infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis and foreign body/prosthetic infection as the primary outcome. We also compared the success between SD and HD2 (≥8 mg/kg) daptomycin treatments in patients with these diseases as the secondary outcome. The incidence of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation was evaluated as safety. Results In patients with complicated bacteraemia and infective endocarditis, the treatment success was significantly lower in the SD group than in the HD group (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.76 and OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30–0.82) and HD2 group (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21–0.69 and OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15–0.60), respectively. A significant difference was demonstrated only in the HD2 group in patients with bacteraemia, including simple infection. SD did not decrease the success rate for the treatment of osteomyelitis and foreign body/prosthetic infection. The incidence of elevated CPK was significantly lower in SD group than in HD group. Conclusion SD daptomycin was associated with significantly lower treatment success than HD in patients with complicated bacteraemia/infective endocarditis. The CPK elevation should be considered in patients treated with high daptomycin doses.