The timing of cortical activation in associator grapheme-colour synaesthetes using MEG

• Published in: Neuropsychologia 2023-03, Vol.181, p.108491-108491, Article 108491
• Main Authors: Michalareas, Georgios, Kusnir, Flor, Thut, Gregor, Gross, Joachim
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Color; Color Perception - physiology; Humans; ICA; MEG; Multisensory; Occipito-parietal cortex; Synaesthesia; Synesthesia
• ISSN: 0028-3932; 1873-3514
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108491

Grapheme-colour synaesthetes experience an anomalous form of perception in which graphemes systematically induce specific colour concurrents in their mind's eye (“associator” type). Although grapheme-colour synaesthesia has been well characterised behaviourally, its neural mechanisms remain largely unresolved. There are currently several competing models, which can primarily be distinguished according to the anatomical and temporal predictions of synaesthesia-inducing neural activity. The first main model (Cross-Activation/Cascaded Cross-Tuning and its variants) posits early recruitment of occipital colour areas in the initial feed-forward sweep of brain activity. The second (Disinhibited Feedback) posits: (i) later involvement of a multisensory convergence zone (for example, in parietal cortices) after graphemes have been processed in their entirety; and (ii) subsequent feedback to early visual areas (i.e., occipital colour areas). In this study, we examine both the timing and anatomical correlates of associator grapheme-colour synaesthetes (n = 6) using MEG. Using innovative and unbiased analysis methods with little a priori assumptions, we applied Independent Component Analysis (ICA) on a single-subject level to identify the dominant patterns of activity corresponding to the induced, synaesthetic percept. We observed evoked activity that significantly dissociates between synaesthesia-inducing and non-inducing graphemes at approximately 190 ms following grapheme presentation. This effect is present in grapheme-colour synaesthetes, but not in matched controls, and exhibits an occipito-parietal topology localised consistently within individuals to extrastriate visual cortices and superior parietal lobes. Due to the observed timing of this evoked activity and its localization, our results support a model predicting relatively late synaesthesia-inducing activity, more akin to the Disinhibited Feedback model. •First MEG study to-date examining associator graphene-colour synaesthetes.•Use of single-subj. ICA to dissociate synaesthesia-inducing vs. non-inducing activity.•We observe evoked activity ∼190 ms following graphene presentation.•Effects localize consistently to extrastriate visual and superior parietal cortices.•Results consistent with model attributing synaesthesia to “late” processing.