Loading…

Quantitative modelling demonstrates format‐invariant representations of mathematical problems in the brain

Mathematical problems can be described in either symbolic form or natural language. Previous studies have reported that activation overlaps exist for these two types of mathematical problems, but it is unclear whether they are based on similar brain representations. Furthermore, quantitative modelli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The European journal of neuroscience 2023-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1003-1017
Main Authors: Nakai, Tomoya, Nishimoto, Shinji
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d66ae8992a17b46aeffa5352be156f4e36667a3d71759569b8d7934cdfea7fbd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d66ae8992a17b46aeffa5352be156f4e36667a3d71759569b8d7934cdfea7fbd3
container_end_page 1017
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1003
container_title The European journal of neuroscience
container_volume 57
creator Nakai, Tomoya
Nishimoto, Shinji
description Mathematical problems can be described in either symbolic form or natural language. Previous studies have reported that activation overlaps exist for these two types of mathematical problems, but it is unclear whether they are based on similar brain representations. Furthermore, quantitative modelling of mathematical problem solving has yet to be attempted. In the present study, subjects underwent 3 h of functional magnetic resonance experiments involving math word and math expression problems, and a read word condition without any calculations was used as a control. To evaluate the brain representations of mathematical problems quantitatively, we constructed voxel‐wise encoding models. Both intra‐ and cross‐format encoding modelling significantly predicted brain activity predominantly in the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS), even after subtraction of the control condition. Representational similarity analysis and principal component analysis revealed that mathematical problems with different formats had similar cortical organization in the IPS. These findings support the idea that mathematical problems are represented in the brain in a format‐invariant manner. Mathematical problems can be described either in a symbolic form or a natural language, while it has been unclear whether they rely on similar brain representations. We constructed voxel‐wise encoding models to quantitatively evaluate brain representations of math word and expression problems. Both intra‐ and cross‐format encoding modelling significantly predicted brain activity predominantly in the left intraparietal sulcus. Representational similarity and principal component analysis revealed similar cortical organization for the two formats. These findings indicate that mathematical problems are represented in the brain in a format‐invariant manner.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ejn.15925
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2771083840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2787115727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d66ae8992a17b46aeffa5352be156f4e36667a3d71759569b8d7934cdfea7fbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFtWmaS5ciXhFFUHBX0naiObTpMWkVdz6Cz-iTOHrUhWAWySR88zN_fkI2WbrHcO3D1O8xUWRigUxYLtOkEFIvkklaCJ5oJu9WyGqM0zRNtczFMlnhUjG8sAlpr0fjBzeYwT0B7foG2tb5e9pA1_s4BDNApLYPnRneX9-cfzLBYQMNMAsQwX82Ikh7SxF5ANxcbVo6C33VQhep8xSfaRWM8-tkyZo2wsb3uUZuj49uDk-Ti6uTs8ODi6TmWoukkdKALorMMFXlWFtrBBdZBUxImwOXUirDG8WUQKdFpRtV8LxuLBhlq4avkZ25Lk7xOEIcys7FGp0ZD_0Yy0yhfc11niK6_Qed9mPwOB1SWjEmVKaQ2p1TdehjDGDLWXCdCS8lS8vPCEqMoPyKANmtb8Wx6qD5JX_-HIH9OfDsWnj5X6k8Or-cS34AVWSTcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2787115727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative modelling demonstrates format‐invariant representations of mathematical problems in the brain</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Nakai, Tomoya ; Nishimoto, Shinji</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Tomoya ; Nishimoto, Shinji</creatorcontrib><description>Mathematical problems can be described in either symbolic form or natural language. Previous studies have reported that activation overlaps exist for these two types of mathematical problems, but it is unclear whether they are based on similar brain representations. Furthermore, quantitative modelling of mathematical problem solving has yet to be attempted. In the present study, subjects underwent 3 h of functional magnetic resonance experiments involving math word and math expression problems, and a read word condition without any calculations was used as a control. To evaluate the brain representations of mathematical problems quantitatively, we constructed voxel‐wise encoding models. Both intra‐ and cross‐format encoding modelling significantly predicted brain activity predominantly in the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS), even after subtraction of the control condition. Representational similarity analysis and principal component analysis revealed that mathematical problems with different formats had similar cortical organization in the IPS. These findings support the idea that mathematical problems are represented in the brain in a format‐invariant manner. Mathematical problems can be described either in a symbolic form or a natural language, while it has been unclear whether they rely on similar brain representations. We constructed voxel‐wise encoding models to quantitatively evaluate brain representations of math word and expression problems. Both intra‐ and cross‐format encoding modelling significantly predicted brain activity predominantly in the left intraparietal sulcus. Representational similarity and principal component analysis revealed similar cortical organization for the two formats. These findings indicate that mathematical problems are represented in the brain in a format‐invariant manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-816X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36710081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; encoding ; fMRI ; Humans ; Intraparietal sulcus ; IPS ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mathematical models ; Mathematical problems ; mathematics ; Parietal Lobe - physiology ; Principal components analysis ; Problem solving ; Problem Solving - physiology ; RSA</subject><ispartof>The European journal of neuroscience, 2023-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1003-1017</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d66ae8992a17b46aeffa5352be156f4e36667a3d71759569b8d7934cdfea7fbd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d66ae8992a17b46aeffa5352be156f4e36667a3d71759569b8d7934cdfea7fbd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5225-0894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36710081$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Tomoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimoto, Shinji</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative modelling demonstrates format‐invariant representations of mathematical problems in the brain</title><title>The European journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Mathematical problems can be described in either symbolic form or natural language. Previous studies have reported that activation overlaps exist for these two types of mathematical problems, but it is unclear whether they are based on similar brain representations. Furthermore, quantitative modelling of mathematical problem solving has yet to be attempted. In the present study, subjects underwent 3 h of functional magnetic resonance experiments involving math word and math expression problems, and a read word condition without any calculations was used as a control. To evaluate the brain representations of mathematical problems quantitatively, we constructed voxel‐wise encoding models. Both intra‐ and cross‐format encoding modelling significantly predicted brain activity predominantly in the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS), even after subtraction of the control condition. Representational similarity analysis and principal component analysis revealed that mathematical problems with different formats had similar cortical organization in the IPS. These findings support the idea that mathematical problems are represented in the brain in a format‐invariant manner. Mathematical problems can be described either in a symbolic form or a natural language, while it has been unclear whether they rely on similar brain representations. We constructed voxel‐wise encoding models to quantitatively evaluate brain representations of math word and expression problems. Both intra‐ and cross‐format encoding modelling significantly predicted brain activity predominantly in the left intraparietal sulcus. Representational similarity and principal component analysis revealed similar cortical organization for the two formats. These findings indicate that mathematical problems are represented in the brain in a format‐invariant manner.</description><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>encoding</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraparietal sulcus</subject><subject>IPS</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematical problems</subject><subject>mathematics</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe - physiology</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Problem Solving - physiology</subject><subject>RSA</subject><issn>0953-816X</issn><issn>1460-9568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxTAQhoMoerwsfAEJuNFFtWmaS5ciXhFFUHBX0naiObTpMWkVdz6Cz-iTOHrUhWAWySR88zN_fkI2WbrHcO3D1O8xUWRigUxYLtOkEFIvkklaCJ5oJu9WyGqM0zRNtczFMlnhUjG8sAlpr0fjBzeYwT0B7foG2tb5e9pA1_s4BDNApLYPnRneX9-cfzLBYQMNMAsQwX82Ikh7SxF5ANxcbVo6C33VQhep8xSfaRWM8-tkyZo2wsb3uUZuj49uDk-Ti6uTs8ODi6TmWoukkdKALorMMFXlWFtrBBdZBUxImwOXUirDG8WUQKdFpRtV8LxuLBhlq4avkZ25Lk7xOEIcys7FGp0ZD_0Yy0yhfc11niK6_Qed9mPwOB1SWjEmVKaQ2p1TdehjDGDLWXCdCS8lS8vPCEqMoPyKANmtb8Wx6qD5JX_-HIH9OfDsWnj5X6k8Or-cS34AVWSTcQ</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Nakai, Tomoya</creator><creator>Nishimoto, Shinji</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-0894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Quantitative modelling demonstrates format‐invariant representations of mathematical problems in the brain</title><author>Nakai, Tomoya ; Nishimoto, Shinji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d66ae8992a17b46aeffa5352be156f4e36667a3d71759569b8d7934cdfea7fbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>encoding</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraparietal sulcus</topic><topic>IPS</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematical problems</topic><topic>mathematics</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe - physiology</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Problem Solving - physiology</topic><topic>RSA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Tomoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimoto, Shinji</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley_OA刊</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakai, Tomoya</au><au>Nishimoto, Shinji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative modelling demonstrates format‐invariant representations of mathematical problems in the brain</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1003</spage><epage>1017</epage><pages>1003-1017</pages><issn>0953-816X</issn><eissn>1460-9568</eissn><abstract>Mathematical problems can be described in either symbolic form or natural language. Previous studies have reported that activation overlaps exist for these two types of mathematical problems, but it is unclear whether they are based on similar brain representations. Furthermore, quantitative modelling of mathematical problem solving has yet to be attempted. In the present study, subjects underwent 3 h of functional magnetic resonance experiments involving math word and math expression problems, and a read word condition without any calculations was used as a control. To evaluate the brain representations of mathematical problems quantitatively, we constructed voxel‐wise encoding models. Both intra‐ and cross‐format encoding modelling significantly predicted brain activity predominantly in the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS), even after subtraction of the control condition. Representational similarity analysis and principal component analysis revealed that mathematical problems with different formats had similar cortical organization in the IPS. These findings support the idea that mathematical problems are represented in the brain in a format‐invariant manner. Mathematical problems can be described either in a symbolic form or a natural language, while it has been unclear whether they rely on similar brain representations. We constructed voxel‐wise encoding models to quantitatively evaluate brain representations of math word and expression problems. Both intra‐ and cross‐format encoding modelling significantly predicted brain activity predominantly in the left intraparietal sulcus. Representational similarity and principal component analysis revealed similar cortical organization for the two formats. These findings indicate that mathematical problems are represented in the brain in a format‐invariant manner.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36710081</pmid><doi>10.1111/ejn.15925</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-0894</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0953-816X
ispartof The European journal of neuroscience, 2023-03, Vol.57 (6), p.1003-1017
issn 0953-816X
1460-9568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2771083840
source Wiley
subjects Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - physiology
Brain Mapping
encoding
fMRI
Humans
Intraparietal sulcus
IPS
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mathematical models
Mathematical problems
mathematics
Parietal Lobe - physiology
Principal components analysis
Problem solving
Problem Solving - physiology
RSA
title Quantitative modelling demonstrates format‐invariant representations of mathematical problems in the brain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A49%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20modelling%20demonstrates%20format%E2%80%90invariant%20representations%20of%20mathematical%20problems%20in%20the%20brain&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Nakai,%20Tomoya&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1003&rft.epage=1017&rft.pages=1003-1017&rft.issn=0953-816X&rft.eissn=1460-9568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ejn.15925&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2787115727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d66ae8992a17b46aeffa5352be156f4e36667a3d71759569b8d7934cdfea7fbd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2787115727&rft_id=info:pmid/36710081&rfr_iscdi=true