Loading…

Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Use of Diabetes Technologies Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries With Type 1 Diabetes

Abstract Context Racial/ethnic inequities have been observed in diabetes care. Objective To measure changes in prevalence of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pump therapy among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with type 1 diabetes by race/ethnicity and to determine the impact of socio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2023-07, Vol.108 (7), p.e388-e395
Main Authors: Kommareddi, Mallika, Wherry, Kael, Vigersky, Robert A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Context Racial/ethnic inequities have been observed in diabetes care. Objective To measure changes in prevalence of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pump therapy among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with type 1 diabetes by race/ethnicity and to determine the impact of socioeconomic factors on racial/ethnic inequities. Design The prevalence of CGM and pump use was assessed by race/ethnicity for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries annually from 2017 through 2020. Models predicting technology use by year, race/ethnicity, age, sex, endocrinology visits, and measures of socioeconomic status were fit. Setting Community. Patients or Other Participants Beneficiaries with type 1 diabetes and 2 or more claims with a diabetes diagnosis in the coverage year. Intervention(s) Insulin pump or CGM therapy. Main Outcome Measure(s) Use of diabetes technology by racial/ethnic group. Results Technology use increased from 2017 through 2020 in all racial/ethnic groups. The absolute difference in use between White and Black beneficiaries from 2017 to 2020 remained stable for insulin pumps (10.7% to 10.8%) and increased for CGM (2.6% to 11.1%). The differences in pump use from 2017 to 2020 narrowed between White and Hispanic beneficiaries (12.3% to 11.4%) and White and Asian beneficiaries (9.7% to 6.6%), whereas the opposite occurred for CGM use (3.0% to 15.5% for White vs Hispanic beneficiaries; 1.5% to 8.0% for White vs Asian beneficiaries). Racial/ethnic inequities persisted (P < .0001) after adjusting for other characteristics. Conclusions Differences in diabetes technology use between racial/ethnic groups often persisted from 2017 through 2020 and could not be explained by demographics, socioeconomic status, or endocrinology visits.
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/clinem/dgad046