Loading…

The development of Hebrew zero and pronominal subject realization in the context of first and second person

The study investigates the acquisition of Hebrew zero and pronominal subjects in the context of first and second person. We provide distributional evidence relative to verb tense, number, person, and conversational utterance type, in a peer-talk corpus (2;0-8;0 years). Findings show that acquisition...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of child language 2024-07, Vol.51 (4), p.1-951
Main Authors: Dattner, Elitzur, Ravid, Dorit
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study investigates the acquisition of Hebrew zero and pronominal subjects in the context of first and second person. We provide distributional evidence relative to verb tense, number, person, and conversational utterance type, in a peer-talk corpus (2;0-8;0 years). Findings show that acquisition starts early on, that verb inflectional morphology is crucial for the development of pronominal subjects, and that communicative contexts affect subject realization. Zero and pronominal subjects are not evenly distributed relative to the study variables, and cannot be treated as an alternation. A cluster analysis shows that each realization is linked to a distinguishable usage pattern, corresponding with particular discursive and communicative functions. These are defined as three Discourse Profile Constructions: (A) "calling for action" by 1st.Pl.Fut zero subjects (3;0 year olds); (B) "commenting on the interlocutor's actions" by 2nd.Sg.Past zero subjects (ages 4;0-6;0); and (C) "planning one's own actions" by 1st.Sg.Fut pronominal subjects (7;0-8;0 year olds).
ISSN:0305-0009
1469-7602
DOI:10.1017/S030500092200068X