Clusters of individuals recovering from an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and response to in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation

• Published in: Pulmonology 2023-05, Vol.29 (3), p.230-239
• Main Authors: Vitacca, M., Malovini, A., Spanevello, A., Ceriana, P., Paneroni, M., Maniscalco, M., Balbi, B., Rizzello, L., Murgia, R., Bellazzi, R., Ambrosino, N.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: COPD; Disease impact; Dyspnoea; Exercise capacity; Exercise training; Hospitals; Humans; Lung; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Quality of Life; Rehabilitation; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 2531-0437; 2531-0437
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.01.002

Due to the present low availability of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for individuals recovering from a COPD exacerbation (ECOPD), we need admission priority criteria. We tested the hypothesis that these individuals might be clustered according to baseline characteristics to identify subpopulations with different responses to PR. Multicentric retrospective analysis of individuals undergone in-hospital PR. Baseline characteristics and outcome measures (six-minute walking test - 6MWT, Medical Research Council scale for dyspnoea -MRC, COPD assessment test –CAT) were used for clustering analysis. Data analysis of 1159 individuals showed that after program, the proportion of individuals reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was 85.0%, 86.3%, and 65.6% for CAT, MRC, and 6MWT respectively. Three clusters were found (C1-severe: 10.9%; C2-intermediate: 74.4%; C3-mild: 14.7% of cases respectively). Cluster C1-severe showed the worst conditions with the largest post PR improvements in outcome measures; C3-mild showed the least severe baseline conditions, but the smallest improvements. The proportion of participants reaching the MCID in ALL three outcome measures was significantly different among clusters, with C1-severe having the highest proportion of full success (69.0%) as compared to C2-intermediate (48.3%) and C3-mild (37.4%). Participants in C2-intermediate and C1-severe had 1.7- and 4.6-fold increases in the probability to reach the MCID in all three outcomes as compared to those in C3-mild (OR = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.2 – 2.49, p = 0.0035 and OR = 4.57, 95% CI = 2.68 – 7.91, p < 0.0001 respectively). Clustering analysis can identify subpopulations of individuals recovering from ECOPD associated with different responses to PR. Our results may help in defining priority criteria based on the probability of success of PR.