Revision Surgery After Failed Index Synthetic Cartilage Implant Resurfacing for Hallux Rigidus: Single-Surgeon 5-Year Experience

• Published in: Foot and ankle specialist 2024-08, Vol.17 (4), p.365-374
• Main Authors: Chopra, Aman, Fletcher, Amanda N., Madi, Naji S., Parekh, Selene G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Arthrodesis - instrumentation; Arthrodesis - methods; Female; Hallux Rigidus - surgery; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Male; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - surgery; Middle Aged; Prosthesis Failure; Range of Motion, Articular; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 1938-6400; 1938-7636; 1938-7636
• DOI: 10.1177/19386400221147773

Background While metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is regarded as the gold standard treatment option for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR), synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) resurfacing has gained popularity. This study aimed to identify the SCI resurfacing failure rate for a single surgeon, while also comparing clinical outcomes of patients who underwent SCI replacement or MTPJ arthrodesis after failed index SCI resurfacing. Methods Health records were queried from 2016 to 2021 for patients with HR who were treated with SCI resurfacing by a single surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and hallux valgus angles were compared. A subgroup analysis was performed on patients who underwent revision with SCI replacement or MTPJ arthrodesis. SCI replacement included the use of bone graft, bone putty, or a custom 3D printed baseplate to prevent implant subsidence. Results A total of 219 SCI resurfacing procedures were performed by a single surgeon, including 23 revisions. When analyzing index procedures, an 8.2% revision rate was determined. The revision cohort (n = 23) consisted of 19 female patients and presented with a mean body mass index of 29.5 ± 5 kg/m2, mean age of 52.8 ± 11 years, mean follow-up duration of 22.3 (range, 3-54) months, and mean time to a revision surgery of 12.1 ± 12 (range, 1-50) months. Specifically, 12 procedures resulted in an SCI replacement, while 11 procedures resulted in arthrodesis. While all patients experienced significant improvement in their VAS pain scores (P < .001), the arthrodesis cohort experienced a greater improvement than the SCI revision cohort (P = .04). Conclusion When analyzing SCI revision procedures, MTPJ arthrodesis reduced pain more significantly than SCI replacement. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series