Loading…
Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations
Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factor...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023-01, Vol.153 (1), p.26-39 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3 |
container_end_page | 39 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 153 |
creator | Meinke, Deanna K Martin, William Hal |
description | Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/10.0016362 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773120929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2773120929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAURS0EoqWw8ANQRoQUsP0SO2ZrK76kSiwwR078LIySuNjJ0H-Pqxam-97V0R0OIdeM3jPG2UNKSpkAwU_InJWc5lXJi1Myp6nOCyXEjFzE-J3esgJ1TmYgJHBe0jnhK-_Hrw5jzPRknO9xDLvHbNk3DocxG7yLmLV-iM5g0KNL1yU5s7qLeHXMBfl8fvpYv-ab95e39XKTt8BhzGVZgrXGGg3GiqKwDCtrlKaVlFIDqwxorhoUDQUl2gpLYRKmQVNTUNrCgtwedrfB_0wYx7p3scWu0wP6KdZcSmCcKq4SendA2-BjDGjrbXC9Drua0XrvaJ9HRwm-Oe5OTY_mH_2TAr9WwmAe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773120929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Meinke, Deanna K ; Martin, William Hal</creator><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Deanna K ; Martin, William Hal</creatorcontrib><description>Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0016362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36732250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Audiometry - methods ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold ; Hearing ; Noise - adverse effects ; Sound</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-01, Vol.153 (1), p.26-39</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Deanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William Hal</creatorcontrib><title>Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds.</description><subject>Audiometry - methods</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Noise - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sound</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAURS0EoqWw8ANQRoQUsP0SO2ZrK76kSiwwR078LIySuNjJ0H-Pqxam-97V0R0OIdeM3jPG2UNKSpkAwU_InJWc5lXJi1Myp6nOCyXEjFzE-J3esgJ1TmYgJHBe0jnhK-_Hrw5jzPRknO9xDLvHbNk3DocxG7yLmLV-iM5g0KNL1yU5s7qLeHXMBfl8fvpYv-ab95e39XKTt8BhzGVZgrXGGg3GiqKwDCtrlKaVlFIDqwxorhoUDQUl2gpLYRKmQVNTUNrCgtwedrfB_0wYx7p3scWu0wP6KdZcSmCcKq4SendA2-BjDGjrbXC9Drua0XrvaJ9HRwm-Oe5OTY_mH_2TAr9WwmAe</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Meinke, Deanna K</creator><creator>Martin, William Hal</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations</title><author>Meinke, Deanna K ; Martin, William Hal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Audiometry - methods</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Noise - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Deanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William Hal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meinke, Deanna K</au><au>Martin, William Hal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>26-39</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>36732250</pmid><doi>10.1121/10.0016362</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-01, Vol.153 (1), p.26-39 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773120929 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
subjects | Audiometry - methods Audiometry, Pure-Tone Auditory Threshold Hearing Noise - adverse effects Sound |
title | Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Boothless%20audiometry:%20Ambient%20noise%20considerations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Meinke,%20Deanna%20K&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=26-39&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0016362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773120929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773120929&rft_id=info:pmid/36732250&rfr_iscdi=true |