Loading…

Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations

Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023-01, Vol.153 (1), p.26-39
Main Authors: Meinke, Deanna K, Martin, William Hal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3
container_end_page 39
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 153
creator Meinke, Deanna K
Martin, William Hal
description Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0016362
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773120929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2773120929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAURS0EoqWw8ANQRoQUsP0SO2ZrK76kSiwwR078LIySuNjJ0H-Pqxam-97V0R0OIdeM3jPG2UNKSpkAwU_InJWc5lXJi1Myp6nOCyXEjFzE-J3esgJ1TmYgJHBe0jnhK-_Hrw5jzPRknO9xDLvHbNk3DocxG7yLmLV-iM5g0KNL1yU5s7qLeHXMBfl8fvpYv-ab95e39XKTt8BhzGVZgrXGGg3GiqKwDCtrlKaVlFIDqwxorhoUDQUl2gpLYRKmQVNTUNrCgtwedrfB_0wYx7p3scWu0wP6KdZcSmCcKq4SendA2-BjDGjrbXC9Drua0XrvaJ9HRwm-Oe5OTY_mH_2TAr9WwmAe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2773120929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Meinke, Deanna K ; Martin, William Hal</creator><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Deanna K ; Martin, William Hal</creatorcontrib><description>Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0016362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36732250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Audiometry - methods ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Auditory Threshold ; Hearing ; Noise - adverse effects ; Sound</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-01, Vol.153 (1), p.26-39</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36732250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Deanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William Hal</creatorcontrib><title>Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds.</description><subject>Audiometry - methods</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Noise - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sound</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAURS0EoqWw8ANQRoQUsP0SO2ZrK76kSiwwR078LIySuNjJ0H-Pqxam-97V0R0OIdeM3jPG2UNKSpkAwU_InJWc5lXJi1Myp6nOCyXEjFzE-J3esgJ1TmYgJHBe0jnhK-_Hrw5jzPRknO9xDLvHbNk3DocxG7yLmLV-iM5g0KNL1yU5s7qLeHXMBfl8fvpYv-ab95e39XKTt8BhzGVZgrXGGg3GiqKwDCtrlKaVlFIDqwxorhoUDQUl2gpLYRKmQVNTUNrCgtwedrfB_0wYx7p3scWu0wP6KdZcSmCcKq4SendA2-BjDGjrbXC9Drua0XrvaJ9HRwm-Oe5OTY_mH_2TAr9WwmAe</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Meinke, Deanna K</creator><creator>Martin, William Hal</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations</title><author>Meinke, Deanna K ; Martin, William Hal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Audiometry - methods</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Noise - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meinke, Deanna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, William Hal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meinke, Deanna K</au><au>Martin, William Hal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>153</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>26-39</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Ambient noise in the test environment will impact signal detection during hearing threshold measurements due to psychoacoustic masking effects. Technical standards specify the maximum permissible ambient noise levels (MPANLs) for use during audiometric testing. MPANLs are dependent on several factors, including transducer characteristics (supra-aural, circumaural, type of ear cushions or earphone enclosures, and insert earphones), the nature of the hearing test being performed (air conduction vs bone conduction and threshold test vs screen at a suprathreshold level), and measurement instrumentation. The nature of the ambient noise (spectrum and constant vs variable) at the test site must be determined and continually accounted for during the boothless hearing test procedure. Ambient noise monitoring procedures are reviewed and examples of ambient noise characteristics in real-world settings, where hearing testing might be performed outside of a sound-treated environment, are provided. Practical considerations are presented, including examples of available tools for ambient noise monitoring, selection of test locations, and transducer attenuation. These are discussed in the context of calculating MPANLs and how best to ensure that ambient noise levels are not negatively impacting the validity of hearing thresholds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>36732250</pmid><doi>10.1121/10.0016362</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-01, Vol.153 (1), p.26-39
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2773120929
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Audiometry - methods
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Auditory Threshold
Hearing
Noise - adverse effects
Sound
title Boothless audiometry: Ambient noise considerations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Boothless%20audiometry:%20Ambient%20noise%20considerations&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Meinke,%20Deanna%20K&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=153&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=26-39&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0016362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2773120929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7553ffdfda3df644f1e8fd9a08777a318d3a29be6b0396c8e56d644a3a0d400c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2773120929&rft_id=info:pmid/36732250&rfr_iscdi=true