Is my AV crashing? An online photo-based experiment assessing whether shared intended pathway can help AV drivers anticipate silent failures

The shared responsibility between conditional AVs drivers demands shared understanding. Thus, a shared intended pathway (SIP)—a graphical display of the AV’s planned manoeuvres in a head-up display to help drivers anticipate silent failures is proposed. An online, randomised photo experiment was con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ergonomics 2023-12, Vol.66 (12), p.1984-1998
Main Authors: Swain, Ritwik, Kaye, Sherrie-Anne, Rakotonirainy, Andry
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accidents, Traffic
Augmented reality
Automation
Automobile Driving
Boxes
Experiments
Failure
Head-up displays
HMI
human factors
Humans
Maneuvers
Object recognition
object recognition bounding boxes
Pattern recognition
Self Report
shared intention
Trust
Visual Perception
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-307c8a7cf47529f609604bf0b31de1802992cbe05c519c412b69c898a72fc4da3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-307c8a7cf47529f609604bf0b31de1802992cbe05c519c412b69c898a72fc4da3
container_end_page 1998
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1984
container_title Ergonomics
container_volume 66
creator Swain, Ritwik
Kaye, Sherrie-Anne
Rakotonirainy, Andry
description The shared responsibility between conditional AVs drivers demands shared understanding. Thus, a shared intended pathway (SIP)—a graphical display of the AV’s planned manoeuvres in a head-up display to help drivers anticipate silent failures is proposed. An online, randomised photo experiment was conducted with 394 drivers in Australia. The photos presented traffic scenarios where the SIP forecast either safe or unsafe manoeuvres (silent failures). Participants were required to respond by selecting whether driver intervention was necessary or not. Additionally, the effects of presented object recognition bounding boxes which indicated whether a road user was recognised or not were also tested in the experiment. The SIP led to correct intervention choices 87% of the time, and to calibrating self-reported trust, perceived ease of use and usefulness. The bounding boxes found no significant effects. Results suggest SIPs can assist in monitoring conditional automation. Future research in simulator studies is recommended. Practitioner summary: Conditional AV drivers are expected to take-over control during failures. However, drivers are not informed about the AV’s planned manoeuvres. A visual display that presents the shared intended pathway is proposed to help drivers mitigate silent failures. This online photo experiment found the display helped anticipate failures with 87% accuracy.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/00140139.2023.2176551
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2774894249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2774894249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-307c8a7cf47529f609604bf0b31de1802992cbe05c519c412b69c898a72fc4da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi0EotPCI4AssWGTwb9JvIJRRaFSJTbA1nKcG-Iq4wTfpMO8Aw-No5myYMHKtnS-7175EPKKsy1nNXvHGFeMS7MVTMit4FWpNX9CNlyWZaFrVT0lm5UpVuiCXCLe56fkRjwnF7KsdGm02pDft0j3R7r7Tn1y2If44z3dRTrGIUSgUz_OY9E4hJbCrwlS2EOcqUMExMzSQw9zD4li71JmQpwhtvkyubk_uCP1LtIehmkd0KbwAAmpi3PwIRNAMQxrX-fCsCTAF-RZ5waEl-fziny7-fj1-nNx9-XT7fXurvBK8bmQrPK1q3ynKi1MVzJTMtV0rJG8BV4zYYzwDTDtNTdecdGUxtcmR0TnVevkFXl76p3S-HMBnO0-oIdhcBHGBa2oKlUbJZTJ6Jt_0PtxSTFvZ4URnEktBcuUPlE-jYgJOjvlr3LpaDmzqy77qMuuuuxZV869PrcvzR7av6lHPxn4cAJC7Ma0d4cxDa2d3XEYU5dc9AGt_P-MP2ASpLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2921035320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is my AV crashing? An online photo-based experiment assessing whether shared intended pathway can help AV drivers anticipate silent failures</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Swain, Ritwik ; Kaye, Sherrie-Anne ; Rakotonirainy, Andry</creator><creatorcontrib>Swain, Ritwik ; Kaye, Sherrie-Anne ; Rakotonirainy, Andry</creatorcontrib><description>The shared responsibility between conditional AVs drivers demands shared understanding. Thus, a shared intended pathway (SIP)—a graphical display of the AV’s planned manoeuvres in a head-up display to help drivers anticipate silent failures is proposed. An online, randomised photo experiment was conducted with 394 drivers in Australia. The photos presented traffic scenarios where the SIP forecast either safe or unsafe manoeuvres (silent failures). Participants were required to respond by selecting whether driver intervention was necessary or not. Additionally, the effects of presented object recognition bounding boxes which indicated whether a road user was recognised or not were also tested in the experiment. The SIP led to correct intervention choices 87% of the time, and to calibrating self-reported trust, perceived ease of use and usefulness. The bounding boxes found no significant effects. Results suggest SIPs can assist in monitoring conditional automation. Future research in simulator studies is recommended. Practitioner summary: Conditional AV drivers are expected to take-over control during failures. However, drivers are not informed about the AV’s planned manoeuvres. A visual display that presents the shared intended pathway is proposed to help drivers mitigate silent failures. This online photo experiment found the display helped anticipate failures with 87% accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2176551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36756954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Accidents, Traffic ; Augmented reality ; Automation ; Automobile Driving ; Boxes ; Experiments ; Failure ; Head-up displays ; HMI ; human factors ; Humans ; Maneuvers ; Object recognition ; object recognition bounding boxes ; Pattern recognition ; Self Report ; shared intention ; Trust ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2023-12, Vol.66 (12), p.1984-1998</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-307c8a7cf47529f609604bf0b31de1802992cbe05c519c412b69c898a72fc4da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-307c8a7cf47529f609604bf0b31de1802992cbe05c519c412b69c898a72fc4da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2709-3345 ; 0000-0003-2860-5047 ; 0000-0002-2144-4909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36756954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swain, Ritwik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Sherrie-Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakotonirainy, Andry</creatorcontrib><title>Is my AV crashing? An online photo-based experiment assessing whether shared intended pathway can help AV drivers anticipate silent failures</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>The shared responsibility between conditional AVs drivers demands shared understanding. Thus, a shared intended pathway (SIP)—a graphical display of the AV’s planned manoeuvres in a head-up display to help drivers anticipate silent failures is proposed. An online, randomised photo experiment was conducted with 394 drivers in Australia. The photos presented traffic scenarios where the SIP forecast either safe or unsafe manoeuvres (silent failures). Participants were required to respond by selecting whether driver intervention was necessary or not. Additionally, the effects of presented object recognition bounding boxes which indicated whether a road user was recognised or not were also tested in the experiment. The SIP led to correct intervention choices 87% of the time, and to calibrating self-reported trust, perceived ease of use and usefulness. The bounding boxes found no significant effects. Results suggest SIPs can assist in monitoring conditional automation. Future research in simulator studies is recommended. Practitioner summary: Conditional AV drivers are expected to take-over control during failures. However, drivers are not informed about the AV’s planned manoeuvres. A visual display that presents the shared intended pathway is proposed to help drivers mitigate silent failures. This online photo experiment found the display helped anticipate failures with 87% accuracy.</description><subject>Accidents, Traffic</subject><subject>Augmented reality</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Automobile Driving</subject><subject>Boxes</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Head-up displays</subject><subject>HMI</subject><subject>human factors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maneuvers</subject><subject>Object recognition</subject><subject>object recognition bounding boxes</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>shared intention</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi0EotPCI4AssWGTwb9JvIJRRaFSJTbA1nKcG-Iq4wTfpMO8Aw-No5myYMHKtnS-7175EPKKsy1nNXvHGFeMS7MVTMit4FWpNX9CNlyWZaFrVT0lm5UpVuiCXCLe56fkRjwnF7KsdGm02pDft0j3R7r7Tn1y2If44z3dRTrGIUSgUz_OY9E4hJbCrwlS2EOcqUMExMzSQw9zD4li71JmQpwhtvkyubk_uCP1LtIehmkd0KbwAAmpi3PwIRNAMQxrX-fCsCTAF-RZ5waEl-fziny7-fj1-nNx9-XT7fXurvBK8bmQrPK1q3ynKi1MVzJTMtV0rJG8BV4zYYzwDTDtNTdecdGUxtcmR0TnVevkFXl76p3S-HMBnO0-oIdhcBHGBa2oKlUbJZTJ6Jt_0PtxSTFvZ4URnEktBcuUPlE-jYgJOjvlr3LpaDmzqy77qMuuuuxZV869PrcvzR7av6lHPxn4cAJC7Ma0d4cxDa2d3XEYU5dc9AGt_P-MP2ASpLk</recordid><startdate>20231202</startdate><enddate>20231202</enddate><creator>Swain, Ritwik</creator><creator>Kaye, Sherrie-Anne</creator><creator>Rakotonirainy, Andry</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-3345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2860-5047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-4909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231202</creationdate><title>Is my AV crashing? An online photo-based experiment assessing whether shared intended pathway can help AV drivers anticipate silent failures</title><author>Swain, Ritwik ; Kaye, Sherrie-Anne ; Rakotonirainy, Andry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-307c8a7cf47529f609604bf0b31de1802992cbe05c519c412b69c898a72fc4da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Traffic</topic><topic>Augmented reality</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Automobile Driving</topic><topic>Boxes</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Head-up displays</topic><topic>HMI</topic><topic>human factors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maneuvers</topic><topic>Object recognition</topic><topic>object recognition bounding boxes</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>shared intention</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swain, Ritwik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Sherrie-Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakotonirainy, Andry</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swain, Ritwik</au><au>Kaye, Sherrie-Anne</au><au>Rakotonirainy, Andry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is my AV crashing? An online photo-based experiment assessing whether shared intended pathway can help AV drivers anticipate silent failures</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2023-12-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1984</spage><epage>1998</epage><pages>1984-1998</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><abstract>The shared responsibility between conditional AVs drivers demands shared understanding. Thus, a shared intended pathway (SIP)—a graphical display of the AV’s planned manoeuvres in a head-up display to help drivers anticipate silent failures is proposed. An online, randomised photo experiment was conducted with 394 drivers in Australia. The photos presented traffic scenarios where the SIP forecast either safe or unsafe manoeuvres (silent failures). Participants were required to respond by selecting whether driver intervention was necessary or not. Additionally, the effects of presented object recognition bounding boxes which indicated whether a road user was recognised or not were also tested in the experiment. The SIP led to correct intervention choices 87% of the time, and to calibrating self-reported trust, perceived ease of use and usefulness. The bounding boxes found no significant effects. Results suggest SIPs can assist in monitoring conditional automation. Future research in simulator studies is recommended. Practitioner summary: Conditional AV drivers are expected to take-over control during failures. However, drivers are not informed about the AV’s planned manoeuvres. A visual display that presents the shared intended pathway is proposed to help drivers mitigate silent failures. This online photo experiment found the display helped anticipate failures with 87% accuracy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>36756954</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140139.2023.2176551</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2709-3345</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2860-5047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2144-4909</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-0139
ispartof Ergonomics, 2023-12, Vol.66 (12), p.1984-1998
issn 0014-0139
1366-5847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2774894249
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Accidents, Traffic
Augmented reality
Automation
Automobile Driving
Boxes
Experiments
Failure
Head-up displays
HMI
human factors
Humans
Maneuvers
Object recognition
object recognition bounding boxes
Pattern recognition
Self Report
shared intention
Trust
Visual Perception
title Is my AV crashing? An online photo-based experiment assessing whether shared intended pathway can help AV drivers anticipate silent failures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A31%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20my%20AV%20crashing?%20An%20online%20photo-based%20experiment%20assessing%20whether%20shared%20intended%20pathway%20can%20help%20AV%20drivers%20anticipate%20silent%20failures&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Swain,%20Ritwik&rft.date=2023-12-02&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1984&rft.epage=1998&rft.pages=1984-1998&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140139.2023.2176551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2774894249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-307c8a7cf47529f609604bf0b31de1802992cbe05c519c412b69c898a72fc4da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2921035320&rft_id=info:pmid/36756954&rfr_iscdi=true