Loading…
Effect of beneficial sweeps and background selection on genetic diversity in changing environments
Neutral theory predicts that the genetic diversity within a population is proportional to the effective population size. In contrast, the observed genetic diversity for various species vary in a narrow range for several orders of magnitude change in the population sizes (Lewontin’s paradox). The sel...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of theoretical biology 2023-04, Vol.562, p.111431-111431, Article 111431 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-445053ae27378b80c627f42bbeb0e0464a1186ad4e9518f3efdfc28032e894b03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-445053ae27378b80c627f42bbeb0e0464a1186ad4e9518f3efdfc28032e894b03 |
container_end_page | 111431 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111431 |
container_title | Journal of theoretical biology |
container_volume | 562 |
creator | Kaushik, Sachin |
description | Neutral theory predicts that the genetic diversity within a population is proportional to the effective population size. In contrast, the observed genetic diversity for various species vary in a narrow range for several orders of magnitude change in the population sizes (Lewontin’s paradox). The selective sweeps and background selection, reduce the genetic variation at the linked neutral sites and have been studied considering the environment to be selectively constant. However, in a natural population, the selective environment varies with time. Here, we investigate the impact of selective sweeps and background selection on neutral genetic diversity when the selection coefficient changes periodically over time. The reduction in genetic variation due to selective sweeps is known to depend on the conditional fixation time. Here, we find that the effect of changing environment on conditional mean fixation time is most substantial for the randomly mating population than the inbreeding population with arbitrary inbreeding coefficient. We also study the effect of background selection on neutral sites when the selection coefficient of linked deleterious mutation change periodically in time. In the slowly changing environment, we find that neutral heterozygosity is significantly different, and the site frequency spectrum has a different shape than that in the static environment.
•Natural environments are not static and change with time.•The reduction in genetic variation can be caused due to selective sweeps and background selection.•The beneficial sweeps results in changing environment are robust for the inbreeding population.•In a slowly changing environment, genetic diversity at linked neutral sites differs significantly from that in a static environment when the selected site contains deleterious mutations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111431 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2774896431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022519323000279</els_id><sourcerecordid>2774896431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-445053ae27378b80c627f42bbeb0e0464a1186ad4e9518f3efdfc28032e894b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKQzEQhoMoWi8v4EKydHPq5HJu4EakXkBwo-uQ5Exq6mlOTU4rvr0pVZfCwMzi-3-Yj5BzBlMGrLpaTBej8VMOXEwZY1KwPTJh0JZFU0q2TyYAnBcla8UROU5pAQCtFNUhORJVXUoh5YSYmXNoRzo4ajCg89brnqZPxFWiOnTUaPs-j8M6nwn7jPoh0DzzTI_e0s5vMCY_flEfqH3TYe7DnGLY-DiEJYYxnZIDp_uEZz_7hLzezV5uH4qn5_vH25unwkqAsZCyhFJo5LWoG9OArXjtJDcGDSDISmrGmkp3EtuSNU6g65zlDQiOTSsNiBNyuetdxeFjjWlUS58s9r0OOKyT4nUtm7bKmjLKd6iNQ0oRnVpFv9TxSzFQW7dqobZu1dat2rnNoYuf_rVZYvcX-ZWZgesdgPnLjceokvUYLHY-ZnGqG_x__d_RUYss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774896431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of beneficial sweeps and background selection on genetic diversity in changing environments</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kaushik, Sachin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Sachin</creatorcontrib><description>Neutral theory predicts that the genetic diversity within a population is proportional to the effective population size. In contrast, the observed genetic diversity for various species vary in a narrow range for several orders of magnitude change in the population sizes (Lewontin’s paradox). The selective sweeps and background selection, reduce the genetic variation at the linked neutral sites and have been studied considering the environment to be selectively constant. However, in a natural population, the selective environment varies with time. Here, we investigate the impact of selective sweeps and background selection on neutral genetic diversity when the selection coefficient changes periodically over time. The reduction in genetic variation due to selective sweeps is known to depend on the conditional fixation time. Here, we find that the effect of changing environment on conditional mean fixation time is most substantial for the randomly mating population than the inbreeding population with arbitrary inbreeding coefficient. We also study the effect of background selection on neutral sites when the selection coefficient of linked deleterious mutation change periodically in time. In the slowly changing environment, we find that neutral heterozygosity is significantly different, and the site frequency spectrum has a different shape than that in the static environment.
•Natural environments are not static and change with time.•The reduction in genetic variation can be caused due to selective sweeps and background selection.•The beneficial sweeps results in changing environment are robust for the inbreeding population.•In a slowly changing environment, genetic diversity at linked neutral sites differs significantly from that in a static environment when the selected site contains deleterious mutations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111431</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36754344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Background selection ; Conditional fixation time ; Dominance ; Genetic Variation ; Genetics, Population ; Heterozygosity ; Heterozygote ; Inbreeding ; Models, Genetic ; Population Density ; Selection, Genetic ; Selective sweeps ; Site frequency spectrum</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical biology, 2023-04, Vol.562, p.111431-111431, Article 111431</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-445053ae27378b80c627f42bbeb0e0464a1186ad4e9518f3efdfc28032e894b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-445053ae27378b80c627f42bbeb0e0464a1186ad4e9518f3efdfc28032e894b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9607-7330</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36754344$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Sachin</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of beneficial sweeps and background selection on genetic diversity in changing environments</title><title>Journal of theoretical biology</title><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><description>Neutral theory predicts that the genetic diversity within a population is proportional to the effective population size. In contrast, the observed genetic diversity for various species vary in a narrow range for several orders of magnitude change in the population sizes (Lewontin’s paradox). The selective sweeps and background selection, reduce the genetic variation at the linked neutral sites and have been studied considering the environment to be selectively constant. However, in a natural population, the selective environment varies with time. Here, we investigate the impact of selective sweeps and background selection on neutral genetic diversity when the selection coefficient changes periodically over time. The reduction in genetic variation due to selective sweeps is known to depend on the conditional fixation time. Here, we find that the effect of changing environment on conditional mean fixation time is most substantial for the randomly mating population than the inbreeding population with arbitrary inbreeding coefficient. We also study the effect of background selection on neutral sites when the selection coefficient of linked deleterious mutation change periodically in time. In the slowly changing environment, we find that neutral heterozygosity is significantly different, and the site frequency spectrum has a different shape than that in the static environment.
•Natural environments are not static and change with time.•The reduction in genetic variation can be caused due to selective sweeps and background selection.•The beneficial sweeps results in changing environment are robust for the inbreeding population.•In a slowly changing environment, genetic diversity at linked neutral sites differs significantly from that in a static environment when the selected site contains deleterious mutations.</description><subject>Background selection</subject><subject>Conditional fixation time</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genetics, Population</subject><subject>Heterozygosity</subject><subject>Heterozygote</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Selective sweeps</subject><subject>Site frequency spectrum</subject><issn>0022-5193</issn><issn>1095-8541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKQzEQhoMoWi8v4EKydHPq5HJu4EakXkBwo-uQ5Exq6mlOTU4rvr0pVZfCwMzi-3-Yj5BzBlMGrLpaTBej8VMOXEwZY1KwPTJh0JZFU0q2TyYAnBcla8UROU5pAQCtFNUhORJVXUoh5YSYmXNoRzo4ajCg89brnqZPxFWiOnTUaPs-j8M6nwn7jPoh0DzzTI_e0s5vMCY_flEfqH3TYe7DnGLY-DiEJYYxnZIDp_uEZz_7hLzezV5uH4qn5_vH25unwkqAsZCyhFJo5LWoG9OArXjtJDcGDSDISmrGmkp3EtuSNU6g65zlDQiOTSsNiBNyuetdxeFjjWlUS58s9r0OOKyT4nUtm7bKmjLKd6iNQ0oRnVpFv9TxSzFQW7dqobZu1dat2rnNoYuf_rVZYvcX-ZWZgesdgPnLjceokvUYLHY-ZnGqG_x__d_RUYss</recordid><startdate>20230407</startdate><enddate>20230407</enddate><creator>Kaushik, Sachin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-7330</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230407</creationdate><title>Effect of beneficial sweeps and background selection on genetic diversity in changing environments</title><author>Kaushik, Sachin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-445053ae27378b80c627f42bbeb0e0464a1186ad4e9518f3efdfc28032e894b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Background selection</topic><topic>Conditional fixation time</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genetics, Population</topic><topic>Heterozygosity</topic><topic>Heterozygote</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Selective sweeps</topic><topic>Site frequency spectrum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaushik, Sachin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaushik, Sachin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of beneficial sweeps and background selection on genetic diversity in changing environments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><date>2023-04-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>562</volume><spage>111431</spage><epage>111431</epage><pages>111431-111431</pages><artnum>111431</artnum><issn>0022-5193</issn><eissn>1095-8541</eissn><abstract>Neutral theory predicts that the genetic diversity within a population is proportional to the effective population size. In contrast, the observed genetic diversity for various species vary in a narrow range for several orders of magnitude change in the population sizes (Lewontin’s paradox). The selective sweeps and background selection, reduce the genetic variation at the linked neutral sites and have been studied considering the environment to be selectively constant. However, in a natural population, the selective environment varies with time. Here, we investigate the impact of selective sweeps and background selection on neutral genetic diversity when the selection coefficient changes periodically over time. The reduction in genetic variation due to selective sweeps is known to depend on the conditional fixation time. Here, we find that the effect of changing environment on conditional mean fixation time is most substantial for the randomly mating population than the inbreeding population with arbitrary inbreeding coefficient. We also study the effect of background selection on neutral sites when the selection coefficient of linked deleterious mutation change periodically in time. In the slowly changing environment, we find that neutral heterozygosity is significantly different, and the site frequency spectrum has a different shape than that in the static environment.
•Natural environments are not static and change with time.•The reduction in genetic variation can be caused due to selective sweeps and background selection.•The beneficial sweeps results in changing environment are robust for the inbreeding population.•In a slowly changing environment, genetic diversity at linked neutral sites differs significantly from that in a static environment when the selected site contains deleterious mutations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36754344</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111431</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-7330</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5193 |
ispartof | Journal of theoretical biology, 2023-04, Vol.562, p.111431-111431, Article 111431 |
issn | 0022-5193 1095-8541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2774896431 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Background selection Conditional fixation time Dominance Genetic Variation Genetics, Population Heterozygosity Heterozygote Inbreeding Models, Genetic Population Density Selection, Genetic Selective sweeps Site frequency spectrum |
title | Effect of beneficial sweeps and background selection on genetic diversity in changing environments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A53%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20beneficial%20sweeps%20and%20background%20selection%20on%20genetic%20diversity%20in%20changing%20environments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20biology&rft.au=Kaushik,%20Sachin&rft.date=2023-04-07&rft.volume=562&rft.spage=111431&rft.epage=111431&rft.pages=111431-111431&rft.artnum=111431&rft.issn=0022-5193&rft.eissn=1095-8541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtbi.2023.111431&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2774896431%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-445053ae27378b80c627f42bbeb0e0464a1186ad4e9518f3efdfc28032e894b03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774896431&rft_id=info:pmid/36754344&rfr_iscdi=true |