Loading…

Slice positioning in phase-contrast MRI impacts aortic stenosis assessment

In PC-CMR, measurements at 15mm above LAP (top left, blue line) yielded the best AVA-values in comparison to cardiac catheterization in AS-patients. AS: aortic stenosis, AVA: aortic valve area, LAP: leaflet-attachment-plane, PC-CMR: phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. (Illustra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of radiology 2023-04, Vol.161, p.110722-110722, Article 110722
Main Authors: Troger, Felix, Tiller, Christina, Reindl, Martin, Lechner, Ivan, Holzknecht, Magdalena, Pamminger, Mathias, Poskaite, Paulina, Kremser, Christian, Ulmer, Hanno, Gizewski, Elke Ruth, Bauer, Axel, Reinstadler, Sebastian, Metzler, Bernhard, Klug, Gert, Mayr, Agnes
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-37b141f197b5052235ced153ba21f61ed8416855ab0b46f077795a723ac9100e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-37b141f197b5052235ced153ba21f61ed8416855ab0b46f077795a723ac9100e3
container_end_page 110722
container_issue
container_start_page 110722
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 161
creator Troger, Felix
Tiller, Christina
Reindl, Martin
Lechner, Ivan
Holzknecht, Magdalena
Pamminger, Mathias
Poskaite, Paulina
Kremser, Christian
Ulmer, Hanno
Gizewski, Elke Ruth
Bauer, Axel
Reinstadler, Sebastian
Metzler, Bernhard
Klug, Gert
Mayr, Agnes
description In PC-CMR, measurements at 15mm above LAP (top left, blue line) yielded the best AVA-values in comparison to cardiac catheterization in AS-patients. AS: aortic stenosis, AVA: aortic valve area, LAP: leaflet-attachment-plane, PC-CMR: phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. (Illustration created withhttps://biorender.com) [Display omitted] •Phase-contrast CMR is a useful tool in the diagnostic workup of aortic stenosis.•Velocity and volume measurements 0–10 mm above the valve yield a significant bias.•Measurements 10–20 mm above the valve provide reliable AVA-values.•PC-CMR measurements were in good agreement with volumetric and invasive results. To determine the phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR) slice-position above aortic leaflet-attachment-plane (LAP) that provides flow-velocity, –volume and aortic valve area (AVA) measurements with best agreement to invasive and echocardiographic measurements in aortic stenosis (AS). Fifty-five patients with moderate/severe AS underwent cardiac catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR. Overall, 171 image-planes parallel to LAP were measured via PC-CMR between 22 mm below and 24 mm above LAP. AVA via PC-CMR was calculated as flow-volume divided by peak-velocity during systole. Stroke volume (SV) and AVA were compared to volumetric SV and invasive AVA via the Gorlin-formula, respectively. Above LAP, SV by PC-CMR showed no significant dependence on image-plane-position and correlated strongly with volumetry (rho: 0.633, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110722
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2775613472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X23000360</els_id><sourcerecordid>2775613472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-37b141f197b5052235ced153ba21f61ed8416855ab0b46f077795a723ac9100e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLxEAQhRtRnHH0FwiSo5eMvaTTycGDDC4jiuAC3ppOp6IdstnVI_jvzTijR09FFe_V432EHDM6Z5SlZ_Ucam_KOadczBmjivMdMmWZ4rFSXO2S6XiiMU2y1wk5QKwppTLJ-T6ZiFTJjKtsSm6fGmchGnp0wfWd694i10XDu0GIbd8FbzBE94_LyLWDsQEj0_vgbIQButEz7oiA2EIXDsleZRqEo-2ckZery-fFTXz3cL1cXNzFVsg8xEIVLGEVy1UhqeRcSAslk6IwnFUpgzJLWJpJaQpaJGlFlVK5NIoLY3NGKYgZOd38HXz_sQIMunVooWlMB_0KNVdKpkwko2VGxEZqfY_oodKDd63xX5pRvYaoa_0DUa8h6g3E0XWyDVgVLZR_nl9qo-B8I4Cx5qcDr9E66MYezoMNuuzdvwHfjdKC6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2775613472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slice positioning in phase-contrast MRI impacts aortic stenosis assessment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Troger, Felix ; Tiller, Christina ; Reindl, Martin ; Lechner, Ivan ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Pamminger, Mathias ; Poskaite, Paulina ; Kremser, Christian ; Ulmer, Hanno ; Gizewski, Elke Ruth ; Bauer, Axel ; Reinstadler, Sebastian ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Klug, Gert ; Mayr, Agnes</creator><creatorcontrib>Troger, Felix ; Tiller, Christina ; Reindl, Martin ; Lechner, Ivan ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Pamminger, Mathias ; Poskaite, Paulina ; Kremser, Christian ; Ulmer, Hanno ; Gizewski, Elke Ruth ; Bauer, Axel ; Reinstadler, Sebastian ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Klug, Gert ; Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><description>In PC-CMR, measurements at 15mm above LAP (top left, blue line) yielded the best AVA-values in comparison to cardiac catheterization in AS-patients. AS: aortic stenosis, AVA: aortic valve area, LAP: leaflet-attachment-plane, PC-CMR: phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. (Illustration created withhttps://biorender.com) [Display omitted] •Phase-contrast CMR is a useful tool in the diagnostic workup of aortic stenosis.•Velocity and volume measurements 0–10 mm above the valve yield a significant bias.•Measurements 10–20 mm above the valve provide reliable AVA-values.•PC-CMR measurements were in good agreement with volumetric and invasive results. To determine the phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR) slice-position above aortic leaflet-attachment-plane (LAP) that provides flow-velocity, –volume and aortic valve area (AVA) measurements with best agreement to invasive and echocardiographic measurements in aortic stenosis (AS). Fifty-five patients with moderate/severe AS underwent cardiac catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR. Overall, 171 image-planes parallel to LAP were measured via PC-CMR between 22 mm below and 24 mm above LAP. AVA via PC-CMR was calculated as flow-volume divided by peak-velocity during systole. Stroke volume (SV) and AVA were compared to volumetric SV and invasive AVA via the Gorlin-formula, respectively. Above LAP, SV by PC-CMR showed no significant dependence on image-plane-position and correlated strongly with volumetry (rho: 0.633, p &lt; 0.001, marginal-mean-difference (MMD): 1 ml, 95 % confidence-interval (CI): −4 to 6). AVA assessed in image-planes 0–10 mm above LAP differed significantly from invasive measurement (MMD: −0.14 cm2, 95 %CI: 0.08–0.21). In contrast, AVA-values by PC-CMR measured 10–20 mm above LAP showed good agreement with invasive determination without significant MMD (0.003 cm2, 95 %CI: −0.09 to 0.09). Within these measurements, a plane 15 mm above LAP resulted in the lowest bias (MMD: 0.02 cm2, 95 %CI:-0.29 to 0.33). SV and AVA via TTE correlated moderately with volumetry (rho: 0.461, p &lt; 0.001; bias: 15 ml, p &lt; 0.001) and cardiac catheterization (rho: 0.486, p &lt; 0.001, bias: −0.13 cm2, p &lt; 0.001), respectively. PC-CMR measurements at 0–10 mm above LAP should be avoided due to significant AVA-overestimation compared to invasive determination. AVA-assessment by PC-CMR between 10 and 20 mm above LAP did not differ from invasive measurements, with the lowest intermethodical bias measured 15 mm above LAP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110722</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36758278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve - pathology ; Aortic valve stenosis ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - pathology ; Cardiac catheterization ; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging ; Echocardiography ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Stroke Volume ; Valvular heart disease</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2023-04, Vol.161, p.110722-110722, Article 110722</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-37b141f197b5052235ced153ba21f61ed8416855ab0b46f077795a723ac9100e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-37b141f197b5052235ced153ba21f61ed8416855ab0b46f077795a723ac9100e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9363-873X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36758278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Troger, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reindl, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechner, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poskaite, Paulina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulmer, Hanno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gizewski, Elke Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinstadler, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klug, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><title>Slice positioning in phase-contrast MRI impacts aortic stenosis assessment</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>In PC-CMR, measurements at 15mm above LAP (top left, blue line) yielded the best AVA-values in comparison to cardiac catheterization in AS-patients. AS: aortic stenosis, AVA: aortic valve area, LAP: leaflet-attachment-plane, PC-CMR: phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. (Illustration created withhttps://biorender.com) [Display omitted] •Phase-contrast CMR is a useful tool in the diagnostic workup of aortic stenosis.•Velocity and volume measurements 0–10 mm above the valve yield a significant bias.•Measurements 10–20 mm above the valve provide reliable AVA-values.•PC-CMR measurements were in good agreement with volumetric and invasive results. To determine the phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR) slice-position above aortic leaflet-attachment-plane (LAP) that provides flow-velocity, –volume and aortic valve area (AVA) measurements with best agreement to invasive and echocardiographic measurements in aortic stenosis (AS). Fifty-five patients with moderate/severe AS underwent cardiac catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR. Overall, 171 image-planes parallel to LAP were measured via PC-CMR between 22 mm below and 24 mm above LAP. AVA via PC-CMR was calculated as flow-volume divided by peak-velocity during systole. Stroke volume (SV) and AVA were compared to volumetric SV and invasive AVA via the Gorlin-formula, respectively. Above LAP, SV by PC-CMR showed no significant dependence on image-plane-position and correlated strongly with volumetry (rho: 0.633, p &lt; 0.001, marginal-mean-difference (MMD): 1 ml, 95 % confidence-interval (CI): −4 to 6). AVA assessed in image-planes 0–10 mm above LAP differed significantly from invasive measurement (MMD: −0.14 cm2, 95 %CI: 0.08–0.21). In contrast, AVA-values by PC-CMR measured 10–20 mm above LAP showed good agreement with invasive determination without significant MMD (0.003 cm2, 95 %CI: −0.09 to 0.09). Within these measurements, a plane 15 mm above LAP resulted in the lowest bias (MMD: 0.02 cm2, 95 %CI:-0.29 to 0.33). SV and AVA via TTE correlated moderately with volumetry (rho: 0.461, p &lt; 0.001; bias: 15 ml, p &lt; 0.001) and cardiac catheterization (rho: 0.486, p &lt; 0.001, bias: −0.13 cm2, p &lt; 0.001), respectively. PC-CMR measurements at 0–10 mm above LAP should be avoided due to significant AVA-overestimation compared to invasive determination. AVA-assessment by PC-CMR between 10 and 20 mm above LAP did not differ from invasive measurements, with the lowest intermethodical bias measured 15 mm above LAP.</description><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - pathology</subject><subject>Aortic valve stenosis</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - pathology</subject><subject>Cardiac catheterization</subject><subject>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Valvular heart disease</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElLxEAQhRtRnHH0FwiSo5eMvaTTycGDDC4jiuAC3ppOp6IdstnVI_jvzTijR09FFe_V432EHDM6Z5SlZ_Ucam_KOadczBmjivMdMmWZ4rFSXO2S6XiiMU2y1wk5QKwppTLJ-T6ZiFTJjKtsSm6fGmchGnp0wfWd694i10XDu0GIbd8FbzBE94_LyLWDsQEj0_vgbIQButEz7oiA2EIXDsleZRqEo-2ckZery-fFTXz3cL1cXNzFVsg8xEIVLGEVy1UhqeRcSAslk6IwnFUpgzJLWJpJaQpaJGlFlVK5NIoLY3NGKYgZOd38HXz_sQIMunVooWlMB_0KNVdKpkwko2VGxEZqfY_oodKDd63xX5pRvYaoa_0DUa8h6g3E0XWyDVgVLZR_nl9qo-B8I4Cx5qcDr9E66MYezoMNuuzdvwHfjdKC6g</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Troger, Felix</creator><creator>Tiller, Christina</creator><creator>Reindl, Martin</creator><creator>Lechner, Ivan</creator><creator>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creator><creator>Pamminger, Mathias</creator><creator>Poskaite, Paulina</creator><creator>Kremser, Christian</creator><creator>Ulmer, Hanno</creator><creator>Gizewski, Elke Ruth</creator><creator>Bauer, Axel</creator><creator>Reinstadler, Sebastian</creator><creator>Metzler, Bernhard</creator><creator>Klug, Gert</creator><creator>Mayr, Agnes</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9363-873X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Slice positioning in phase-contrast MRI impacts aortic stenosis assessment</title><author>Troger, Felix ; Tiller, Christina ; Reindl, Martin ; Lechner, Ivan ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Pamminger, Mathias ; Poskaite, Paulina ; Kremser, Christian ; Ulmer, Hanno ; Gizewski, Elke Ruth ; Bauer, Axel ; Reinstadler, Sebastian ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Klug, Gert ; Mayr, Agnes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-37b141f197b5052235ced153ba21f61ed8416855ab0b46f077795a723ac9100e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - pathology</topic><topic>Aortic valve stenosis</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - pathology</topic><topic>Cardiac catheterization</topic><topic>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Valvular heart disease</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Troger, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reindl, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechner, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poskaite, Paulina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulmer, Hanno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gizewski, Elke Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinstadler, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klug, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Troger, Felix</au><au>Tiller, Christina</au><au>Reindl, Martin</au><au>Lechner, Ivan</au><au>Holzknecht, Magdalena</au><au>Pamminger, Mathias</au><au>Poskaite, Paulina</au><au>Kremser, Christian</au><au>Ulmer, Hanno</au><au>Gizewski, Elke Ruth</au><au>Bauer, Axel</au><au>Reinstadler, Sebastian</au><au>Metzler, Bernhard</au><au>Klug, Gert</au><au>Mayr, Agnes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slice positioning in phase-contrast MRI impacts aortic stenosis assessment</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>161</volume><spage>110722</spage><epage>110722</epage><pages>110722-110722</pages><artnum>110722</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>In PC-CMR, measurements at 15mm above LAP (top left, blue line) yielded the best AVA-values in comparison to cardiac catheterization in AS-patients. AS: aortic stenosis, AVA: aortic valve area, LAP: leaflet-attachment-plane, PC-CMR: phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. (Illustration created withhttps://biorender.com) [Display omitted] •Phase-contrast CMR is a useful tool in the diagnostic workup of aortic stenosis.•Velocity and volume measurements 0–10 mm above the valve yield a significant bias.•Measurements 10–20 mm above the valve provide reliable AVA-values.•PC-CMR measurements were in good agreement with volumetric and invasive results. To determine the phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR) slice-position above aortic leaflet-attachment-plane (LAP) that provides flow-velocity, –volume and aortic valve area (AVA) measurements with best agreement to invasive and echocardiographic measurements in aortic stenosis (AS). Fifty-five patients with moderate/severe AS underwent cardiac catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR. Overall, 171 image-planes parallel to LAP were measured via PC-CMR between 22 mm below and 24 mm above LAP. AVA via PC-CMR was calculated as flow-volume divided by peak-velocity during systole. Stroke volume (SV) and AVA were compared to volumetric SV and invasive AVA via the Gorlin-formula, respectively. Above LAP, SV by PC-CMR showed no significant dependence on image-plane-position and correlated strongly with volumetry (rho: 0.633, p &lt; 0.001, marginal-mean-difference (MMD): 1 ml, 95 % confidence-interval (CI): −4 to 6). AVA assessed in image-planes 0–10 mm above LAP differed significantly from invasive measurement (MMD: −0.14 cm2, 95 %CI: 0.08–0.21). In contrast, AVA-values by PC-CMR measured 10–20 mm above LAP showed good agreement with invasive determination without significant MMD (0.003 cm2, 95 %CI: −0.09 to 0.09). Within these measurements, a plane 15 mm above LAP resulted in the lowest bias (MMD: 0.02 cm2, 95 %CI:-0.29 to 0.33). SV and AVA via TTE correlated moderately with volumetry (rho: 0.461, p &lt; 0.001; bias: 15 ml, p &lt; 0.001) and cardiac catheterization (rho: 0.486, p &lt; 0.001, bias: −0.13 cm2, p &lt; 0.001), respectively. PC-CMR measurements at 0–10 mm above LAP should be avoided due to significant AVA-overestimation compared to invasive determination. AVA-assessment by PC-CMR between 10 and 20 mm above LAP did not differ from invasive measurements, with the lowest intermethodical bias measured 15 mm above LAP.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36758278</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110722</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9363-873X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2023-04, Vol.161, p.110722-110722, Article 110722
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2775613472
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve - pathology
Aortic valve stenosis
Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis - pathology
Cardiac catheterization
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Echocardiography
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Stroke Volume
Valvular heart disease
title Slice positioning in phase-contrast MRI impacts aortic stenosis assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A55%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slice%20positioning%20in%20phase-contrast%20MRI%20impacts%20aortic%20stenosis%20assessment&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Troger,%20Felix&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=161&rft.spage=110722&rft.epage=110722&rft.pages=110722-110722&rft.artnum=110722&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110722&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2775613472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-37b141f197b5052235ced153ba21f61ed8416855ab0b46f077795a723ac9100e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2775613472&rft_id=info:pmid/36758278&rfr_iscdi=true