Loading…
Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment
Summary Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate...
Saved in:
Published in: | The New phytologist 2023-05, Vol.238 (3), p.983-994 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583 |
container_end_page | 994 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 983 |
container_title | The New phytologist |
container_volume | 238 |
creator | Tay, Jessica Y. L. Zotz, Gerhard Einzmann, Helena J. R. |
description | Summary
Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate connections; and (3) maintenance of this attachment despite increased size and mechanical disturbances by rain, wind, or crossing animals. Although structural dependence on a host is a defining characteristic of an epiphyte, the fundamental mechanism(s) of how these plants initially attach and remain attached to their hosts remain poorly understood. Bark characteristics such as stability and roughness have been highlighted as keys to an understanding of this connection. Here, we stress that the understanding of how an epiphyte attaches itself to the substrate is central for a meaningful quantification and interpretation of bark roughness. Without explicit information on the attachment mechanism or the relative sizes of the attaching structures, simply linking a haphazardly chosen index of bark roughness to epiphyte establishment is flawed. This review introduces a conceptual framework to explain the mechanistic link between epiphytes and host in different ontogenetic stages and should guide future work designed to improve our understanding of this vital part of epiphyte ecology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nph.18811 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2775951728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2792266004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtP3DAUha0KVKbTLvgDKBKbdhHwK3ayRCNakEZQqa3UVSPHc00yJHawHdD8-3pmgAUSd3Mf-nR07kHomOAzkurcju0ZKUtCPqAZ4aLKS8LkAZphTMtccPH3CH0KYY0xrgpBP6IjJqQsykLO0L9fg3Ox7exd5qaYxRayoQvaWQ1j7JwNmTO7q3c9bOdG-fu0THethRCyzmaPKuipVz6DsRvbTYRMxah0O4CNn9GhUX2AL899jv58v_y9uMqXtz-uFxfLXLPkO18Z2SitteQcSqpBrShlGjPNKqyYgEZqACwFbwQrONeaSmMU8NIYok1Rsjn6utcdvXuYIMR6-wX0vbLgplDT9G9VEEm36OkbdO0mb5O7RFWUCoExT9S3PaW9C8GDqUffDcpvaoLrbeh1Cr3ehZ7Yk2fFqRlg9Uq-pJyA8z3w1PWweV-pvvl5tZf8D-4SjSM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792266004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Tay, Jessica Y. L. ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tay, Jessica Y. L. ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate connections; and (3) maintenance of this attachment despite increased size and mechanical disturbances by rain, wind, or crossing animals. Although structural dependence on a host is a defining characteristic of an epiphyte, the fundamental mechanism(s) of how these plants initially attach and remain attached to their hosts remain poorly understood. Bark characteristics such as stability and roughness have been highlighted as keys to an understanding of this connection. Here, we stress that the understanding of how an epiphyte attaches itself to the substrate is central for a meaningful quantification and interpretation of bark roughness. Without explicit information on the attachment mechanism or the relative sizes of the attaching structures, simply linking a haphazardly chosen index of bark roughness to epiphyte establishment is flawed. This review introduces a conceptual framework to explain the mechanistic link between epiphytes and host in different ontogenetic stages and should guide future work designed to improve our understanding of this vital part of epiphyte ecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.18811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36775857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Attachment ; Bark ; bark traits ; biomechanics ; conceptual framework ; Ecology ; Epiphytes ; epiphytic ; Ontogeny ; Plant Bark ; Plant species ; Plants ; Roughness ; Substrates ; Survival ; Tracheophyta ; Trees</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2023-05, Vol.238 (3), p.983-994</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors © 2023 New Phytologist Foundation</rights><rights>2023 The Authors New Phytologist © 2023 New Phytologist Foundation.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4856-3967 ; 0000-0002-5701-4660 ; 0000-0002-6823-2268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tay, Jessica Y. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotz, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Summary
Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate connections; and (3) maintenance of this attachment despite increased size and mechanical disturbances by rain, wind, or crossing animals. Although structural dependence on a host is a defining characteristic of an epiphyte, the fundamental mechanism(s) of how these plants initially attach and remain attached to their hosts remain poorly understood. Bark characteristics such as stability and roughness have been highlighted as keys to an understanding of this connection. Here, we stress that the understanding of how an epiphyte attaches itself to the substrate is central for a meaningful quantification and interpretation of bark roughness. Without explicit information on the attachment mechanism or the relative sizes of the attaching structures, simply linking a haphazardly chosen index of bark roughness to epiphyte establishment is flawed. This review introduces a conceptual framework to explain the mechanistic link between epiphytes and host in different ontogenetic stages and should guide future work designed to improve our understanding of this vital part of epiphyte ecology.</description><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>bark traits</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>conceptual framework</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Epiphytes</subject><subject>epiphytic</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Plant Bark</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Roughness</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tracheophyta</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtP3DAUha0KVKbTLvgDKBKbdhHwK3ayRCNakEZQqa3UVSPHc00yJHawHdD8-3pmgAUSd3Mf-nR07kHomOAzkurcju0ZKUtCPqAZ4aLKS8LkAZphTMtccPH3CH0KYY0xrgpBP6IjJqQsykLO0L9fg3Ox7exd5qaYxRayoQvaWQ1j7JwNmTO7q3c9bOdG-fu0THethRCyzmaPKuipVz6DsRvbTYRMxah0O4CNn9GhUX2AL899jv58v_y9uMqXtz-uFxfLXLPkO18Z2SitteQcSqpBrShlGjPNKqyYgEZqACwFbwQrONeaSmMU8NIYok1Rsjn6utcdvXuYIMR6-wX0vbLgplDT9G9VEEm36OkbdO0mb5O7RFWUCoExT9S3PaW9C8GDqUffDcpvaoLrbeh1Cr3ehZ7Yk2fFqRlg9Uq-pJyA8z3w1PWweV-pvvl5tZf8D-4SjSM</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Tay, Jessica Y. L.</creator><creator>Zotz, Gerhard</creator><creator>Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4856-3967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-4660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-2268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment</title><author>Tay, Jessica Y. L. ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Einzmann, Helena J. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>bark traits</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>conceptual framework</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Epiphytes</topic><topic>epiphytic</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Plant Bark</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Roughness</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tracheophyta</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tay, Jessica Y. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotz, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tay, Jessica Y. L.</au><au>Zotz, Gerhard</au><au>Einzmann, Helena J. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>238</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>983</spage><epage>994</epage><pages>983-994</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>Summary
Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate connections; and (3) maintenance of this attachment despite increased size and mechanical disturbances by rain, wind, or crossing animals. Although structural dependence on a host is a defining characteristic of an epiphyte, the fundamental mechanism(s) of how these plants initially attach and remain attached to their hosts remain poorly understood. Bark characteristics such as stability and roughness have been highlighted as keys to an understanding of this connection. Here, we stress that the understanding of how an epiphyte attaches itself to the substrate is central for a meaningful quantification and interpretation of bark roughness. Without explicit information on the attachment mechanism or the relative sizes of the attaching structures, simply linking a haphazardly chosen index of bark roughness to epiphyte establishment is flawed. This review introduces a conceptual framework to explain the mechanistic link between epiphytes and host in different ontogenetic stages and should guide future work designed to improve our understanding of this vital part of epiphyte ecology.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36775857</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.18811</doi><tpages>994</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4856-3967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-4660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-2268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-646X |
ispartof | The New phytologist, 2023-05, Vol.238 (3), p.983-994 |
issn | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2775951728 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Attachment Bark bark traits biomechanics conceptual framework Ecology Epiphytes epiphytic Ontogeny Plant Bark Plant species Plants Roughness Substrates Survival Tracheophyta Trees |
title | Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A53%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smoothing%20out%20the%20misconceptions%20of%20the%20role%20of%20bark%20roughness%20in%20vascular%20epiphyte%20attachment&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Tay,%20Jessica%20Y.%20L.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=238&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=983&rft.epage=994&rft.pages=983-994&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.18811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2792266004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792266004&rft_id=info:pmid/36775857&rfr_iscdi=true |