Loading…

Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment

Summary Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The New phytologist 2023-05, Vol.238 (3), p.983-994
Main Authors: Tay, Jessica Y. L., Zotz, Gerhard, Einzmann, Helena J. R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583
container_end_page 994
container_issue 3
container_start_page 983
container_title The New phytologist
container_volume 238
creator Tay, Jessica Y. L.
Zotz, Gerhard
Einzmann, Helena J. R.
description Summary Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate connections; and (3) maintenance of this attachment despite increased size and mechanical disturbances by rain, wind, or crossing animals. Although structural dependence on a host is a defining characteristic of an epiphyte, the fundamental mechanism(s) of how these plants initially attach and remain attached to their hosts remain poorly understood. Bark characteristics such as stability and roughness have been highlighted as keys to an understanding of this connection. Here, we stress that the understanding of how an epiphyte attaches itself to the substrate is central for a meaningful quantification and interpretation of bark roughness. Without explicit information on the attachment mechanism or the relative sizes of the attaching structures, simply linking a haphazardly chosen index of bark roughness to epiphyte establishment is flawed. This review introduces a conceptual framework to explain the mechanistic link between epiphytes and host in different ontogenetic stages and should guide future work designed to improve our understanding of this vital part of epiphyte ecology.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/nph.18811
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2775951728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2792266004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtP3DAUha0KVKbTLvgDKBKbdhHwK3ayRCNakEZQqa3UVSPHc00yJHawHdD8-3pmgAUSd3Mf-nR07kHomOAzkurcju0ZKUtCPqAZ4aLKS8LkAZphTMtccPH3CH0KYY0xrgpBP6IjJqQsykLO0L9fg3Ox7exd5qaYxRayoQvaWQ1j7JwNmTO7q3c9bOdG-fu0THethRCyzmaPKuipVz6DsRvbTYRMxah0O4CNn9GhUX2AL899jv58v_y9uMqXtz-uFxfLXLPkO18Z2SitteQcSqpBrShlGjPNKqyYgEZqACwFbwQrONeaSmMU8NIYok1Rsjn6utcdvXuYIMR6-wX0vbLgplDT9G9VEEm36OkbdO0mb5O7RFWUCoExT9S3PaW9C8GDqUffDcpvaoLrbeh1Cr3ehZ7Yk2fFqRlg9Uq-pJyA8z3w1PWweV-pvvl5tZf8D-4SjSM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2792266004</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Tay, Jessica Y. L. ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tay, Jessica Y. L. ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate connections; and (3) maintenance of this attachment despite increased size and mechanical disturbances by rain, wind, or crossing animals. Although structural dependence on a host is a defining characteristic of an epiphyte, the fundamental mechanism(s) of how these plants initially attach and remain attached to their hosts remain poorly understood. Bark characteristics such as stability and roughness have been highlighted as keys to an understanding of this connection. Here, we stress that the understanding of how an epiphyte attaches itself to the substrate is central for a meaningful quantification and interpretation of bark roughness. Without explicit information on the attachment mechanism or the relative sizes of the attaching structures, simply linking a haphazardly chosen index of bark roughness to epiphyte establishment is flawed. This review introduces a conceptual framework to explain the mechanistic link between epiphytes and host in different ontogenetic stages and should guide future work designed to improve our understanding of this vital part of epiphyte ecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.18811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36775857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Attachment ; Bark ; bark traits ; biomechanics ; conceptual framework ; Ecology ; Epiphytes ; epiphytic ; Ontogeny ; Plant Bark ; Plant species ; Plants ; Roughness ; Substrates ; Survival ; Tracheophyta ; Trees</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2023-05, Vol.238 (3), p.983-994</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors © 2023 New Phytologist Foundation</rights><rights>2023 The Authors New Phytologist © 2023 New Phytologist Foundation.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4856-3967 ; 0000-0002-5701-4660 ; 0000-0002-6823-2268</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775857$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tay, Jessica Y. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotz, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>Summary Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate connections; and (3) maintenance of this attachment despite increased size and mechanical disturbances by rain, wind, or crossing animals. Although structural dependence on a host is a defining characteristic of an epiphyte, the fundamental mechanism(s) of how these plants initially attach and remain attached to their hosts remain poorly understood. Bark characteristics such as stability and roughness have been highlighted as keys to an understanding of this connection. Here, we stress that the understanding of how an epiphyte attaches itself to the substrate is central for a meaningful quantification and interpretation of bark roughness. Without explicit information on the attachment mechanism or the relative sizes of the attaching structures, simply linking a haphazardly chosen index of bark roughness to epiphyte establishment is flawed. This review introduces a conceptual framework to explain the mechanistic link between epiphytes and host in different ontogenetic stages and should guide future work designed to improve our understanding of this vital part of epiphyte ecology.</description><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>bark traits</subject><subject>biomechanics</subject><subject>conceptual framework</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Epiphytes</subject><subject>epiphytic</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Plant Bark</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Roughness</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tracheophyta</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtP3DAUha0KVKbTLvgDKBKbdhHwK3ayRCNakEZQqa3UVSPHc00yJHawHdD8-3pmgAUSd3Mf-nR07kHomOAzkurcju0ZKUtCPqAZ4aLKS8LkAZphTMtccPH3CH0KYY0xrgpBP6IjJqQsykLO0L9fg3Ox7exd5qaYxRayoQvaWQ1j7JwNmTO7q3c9bOdG-fu0THethRCyzmaPKuipVz6DsRvbTYRMxah0O4CNn9GhUX2AL899jv58v_y9uMqXtz-uFxfLXLPkO18Z2SitteQcSqpBrShlGjPNKqyYgEZqACwFbwQrONeaSmMU8NIYok1Rsjn6utcdvXuYIMR6-wX0vbLgplDT9G9VEEm36OkbdO0mb5O7RFWUCoExT9S3PaW9C8GDqUffDcpvaoLrbeh1Cr3ehZ7Yk2fFqRlg9Uq-pJyA8z3w1PWweV-pvvl5tZf8D-4SjSM</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Tay, Jessica Y. L.</creator><creator>Zotz, Gerhard</creator><creator>Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4856-3967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-4660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-2268</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment</title><author>Tay, Jessica Y. L. ; Zotz, Gerhard ; Einzmann, Helena J. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>bark traits</topic><topic>biomechanics</topic><topic>conceptual framework</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Epiphytes</topic><topic>epiphytic</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Plant Bark</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Roughness</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tracheophyta</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tay, Jessica Y. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zotz, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Einzmann, Helena J. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tay, Jessica Y. L.</au><au>Zotz, Gerhard</au><au>Einzmann, Helena J. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>238</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>983</spage><epage>994</epage><pages>983-994</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>Summary Vascular epiphytes represent c. 10% of all vascular plant species. In epiphytes, attachment is essential for survival throughout consecutive ontogenetic stages of their life, starting with: (1) initial propagule attachment to the host; followed by (2) the development of first root‐substrate connections; and (3) maintenance of this attachment despite increased size and mechanical disturbances by rain, wind, or crossing animals. Although structural dependence on a host is a defining characteristic of an epiphyte, the fundamental mechanism(s) of how these plants initially attach and remain attached to their hosts remain poorly understood. Bark characteristics such as stability and roughness have been highlighted as keys to an understanding of this connection. Here, we stress that the understanding of how an epiphyte attaches itself to the substrate is central for a meaningful quantification and interpretation of bark roughness. Without explicit information on the attachment mechanism or the relative sizes of the attaching structures, simply linking a haphazardly chosen index of bark roughness to epiphyte establishment is flawed. This review introduces a conceptual framework to explain the mechanistic link between epiphytes and host in different ontogenetic stages and should guide future work designed to improve our understanding of this vital part of epiphyte ecology.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>36775857</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.18811</doi><tpages>994</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4856-3967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5701-4660</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-2268</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-646X
ispartof The New phytologist, 2023-05, Vol.238 (3), p.983-994
issn 0028-646X
1469-8137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2775951728
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Attachment
Bark
bark traits
biomechanics
conceptual framework
Ecology
Epiphytes
epiphytic
Ontogeny
Plant Bark
Plant species
Plants
Roughness
Substrates
Survival
Tracheophyta
Trees
title Smoothing out the misconceptions of the role of bark roughness in vascular epiphyte attachment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T04%3A53%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smoothing%20out%20the%20misconceptions%20of%20the%20role%20of%20bark%20roughness%20in%20vascular%20epiphyte%20attachment&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Tay,%20Jessica%20Y.%20L.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=238&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=983&rft.epage=994&rft.pages=983-994&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.18811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2792266004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-df7baccc744e82cead223c03c390a36eb7cee0764b63544cc27ffae48ff1cf583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2792266004&rft_id=info:pmid/36775857&rfr_iscdi=true