Congenital hypotonia: systematic approach for prenatal detection

• Published in: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2023-07, Vol.62 (1), p.94-105
• Main Authors: Weissbach, T., Hausman‐Kedem, M., Yanay, Z., Meyer, R., Bar‐Yosef, O., Leibovitch, L., Berkenstadt, M., Chorin, O., Shani, H., Massarwa, A., Achiron, R., Weisz, B., Sharon, R., Mazaki‐Tovi, S., Kassif, E.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breech Presentation; Computed tomography; congenital hypotonia; Diagnosis; Diagnostic systems; Female; Fetal Growth Retardation; fetal motility; Fetus - diagnostic imaging; Fetuses; Genetic screening; Gynecology; Humans; Hypotonia; Infant, Newborn; Magnetic resonance imaging; Male; Medical records; Methylation; Motion detection; Muscle Hypotonia - diagnostic imaging; Muscle Hypotonia - genetics; Neonates; neuromuscular disease; Observational studies; Observational Studies as Topic; Obstetrics; Perception; Polyhydramnios; Pregnancy; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods; reduced fetal movement; Retrospective Studies; Signs; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonography, Prenatal - methods; Ultrasound
• ISSN: 0960-7692; 1469-0705
• DOI: 10.1002/uog.26178

ABSTRACT Objectives Congenital hypotonic conditions are rare and heterogeneous, and some are severely debilitating or lethal. Contrary to its prominent postnatal manifestation, the prenatal presentation of hypotonia is frequently subtle, inhibiting prenatal detection. We aimed to characterize the prenatal sonographic manifestation of congenital hypotonia throughout pregnancy, evaluate the yield of diagnostic tests and propose diagnostic models to increase its prenatal detection. Methods This was a retrospective observational study of singleton pregnancies with congenital hypotonia, diagnosed either prenatally or immediately after birth, at a single tertiary center between the years 2012 and 2020. Prenatally, hypotonia was diagnosed if a fetus showed sonographic or clinical signs suggestive of hypotonia and had a confirmed underlying genetic condition, or in the absence of a known genetic abnormality if the fetus exhibited multiple prominent signs suggestive of hypotonia. Postnatally, it was diagnosed in neonates displaying reduced muscle tone leading to reduced spontaneous movement, reduced swallowing or feeding difficulty. We reviewed the medical records of pregnant patients carrying fetuses subsequently diagnosed with congenital hypotonia and assessed the yield of ultrasound scans, fetal magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and genetic tests. The detection rate of sonographic signs suggesting fetal hypotonia was calculated. The prevalence of non‐specific signs, including polyhydramnios, persistent breech presentation, intrauterine growth restriction and maternal perception of reduced fetal movement, were compared between the study group and the local liveborn singleton population. Potential detection rates of different theoretical semiotic diagnostic models, differing in the threshold for referral for a targeted scan, were assessed based on the cohort's data. Results The study group comprised 26 cases of congenital hypotonia, of which 10 (38.5%) were diagnosed prenatally, and the controls included 95 105 singleton live births, giving a prevalence of congenital hypotonia of 1:3658. Nuchal translucency thickness and the early anomaly scan at 13–17 weeks were normal in all 22 and 23 cases, respectively, in which this was performed. The mid‐trimester scan performed at 19–25 weeks was abnormal in four of 24 (16.7%) cases. The overall prenatal detection rate of congenital hypotonic conditions in our cohort was 38.5%. Only cases which underwent a tar