Loading…

Comparison of sonographic and CT findings for the identification of renal nodules in dogs and cats

Ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) are used to diagnose neoplastic and non‐neoplastic focal renal lesions in dogs and cats; however, comparative studies between these two diagnostic tools are lacking. The aim of this retrospective, methods comparison study was to evaluate and compare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary radiology & ultrasound 2023-05, Vol.64 (3), p.439-447
Main Authors: Rossi, Federica, Gianni, Beatrice, Marconato, Laura, Sabattini, Silvia, Caleri, Elvanessa, Mattolini, Mirko, Camosci, Veronica, Carozzi, Gregorio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd97797e456fca24d545114ba7400713f211adaa5d4fa6f326ae83f7520481213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd97797e456fca24d545114ba7400713f211adaa5d4fa6f326ae83f7520481213
container_end_page 447
container_issue 3
container_start_page 439
container_title Veterinary radiology & ultrasound
container_volume 64
creator Rossi, Federica
Gianni, Beatrice
Marconato, Laura
Sabattini, Silvia
Caleri, Elvanessa
Mattolini, Mirko
Camosci, Veronica
Carozzi, Gregorio
description Ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) are used to diagnose neoplastic and non‐neoplastic focal renal lesions in dogs and cats; however, comparative studies between these two diagnostic tools are lacking. The aim of this retrospective, methods comparison study was to evaluate and compare the performance of US compared to CT in identifying at least one renal nodule in animals with confirmed focal renal lesions. Imaging studies of animals with uni‐ or bilateral renal nodules smaller than 3 cm that underwent both US and CT and that had a pathologically confirmed diagnosis were reviewed. Animals with renal cysts and infarcts were excluded. Recorded features for both modalities included the following: shape, size, number, localization, margins, renal profile. For CT only, recorded features also included attenuation (HU) and pattern of enhancement.  For US only, recorded features also included echogenicity, echostructure, and rate of visibility. Final diagnosis was obtained by cytology or histopathology. Using CT, lesions were identified in all 39 (100%) kidneys of 18 dogs and seven cats. Most lesions were multiple, cortical, well‐defined, iso‐attenuating (precontrast), hypo‐attenuating, and moderately enhancing (postcontrast). Using US, lesions were identified in 29 of 39 (74%) kidneys. Overall, nine (31%) lesions were poorly visible; 10 (26%) kidneys appeared normal; in 17 (59%) organs, lesions’ number was underestimated. Isoechoic, non‐protruding lesions were difficult to identify by US. Ultrasonography underestimated renal lesions compared to CT in 59% of the kidneys (P = 0.001). Final diagnoses included metastatic disease (n = 16), infiltration by feline lymphoma (n = 4), primary neoplasia (n = 3), and non‐neoplastic benign lesions (n = 2).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/vru.13219
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2777009873</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2777009873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd97797e456fca24d545114ba7400713f211adaa5d4fa6f326ae83f7520481213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQl7BI60ccJ0tU8ZIqIaGWbeTEdmuU2MFOQP17XALsmM3M4twrzQHgEqM5jrP48MMcU4KLIzDFPEVJTjJ8HG_E8iTHOZ2AsxDeECKME34KJjTjBeJpPgXV0rWd8CY4C52GcbmtF93O1FBYCZdrqI2Vxm4D1M7Dfqegkcr2Rpta9GZMeWVFA62TQ6MCNBZKF_lDPjLhHJxo0QR18bNnYHN_t14-Jqvnh6fl7SqpKWFFUsmC84KrlGW6FiSVLGUYp5WIDyGOqSYYCykEk6kWmaYkEyqnmjOC0hwTTGfgeuztvHsfVOjL1oRaNY2wyg2hJJxzhIqc04jejGjtXQhe6bLzphV-X2JUHpSWUWn5rTSyVz-1Q9Uq-Uf-OozAYgQ-TaP2_zeVry-bsfILF_OAAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777009873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of sonographic and CT findings for the identification of renal nodules in dogs and cats</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Rossi, Federica ; Gianni, Beatrice ; Marconato, Laura ; Sabattini, Silvia ; Caleri, Elvanessa ; Mattolini, Mirko ; Camosci, Veronica ; Carozzi, Gregorio</creator><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Federica ; Gianni, Beatrice ; Marconato, Laura ; Sabattini, Silvia ; Caleri, Elvanessa ; Mattolini, Mirko ; Camosci, Veronica ; Carozzi, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><description>Ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) are used to diagnose neoplastic and non‐neoplastic focal renal lesions in dogs and cats; however, comparative studies between these two diagnostic tools are lacking. The aim of this retrospective, methods comparison study was to evaluate and compare the performance of US compared to CT in identifying at least one renal nodule in animals with confirmed focal renal lesions. Imaging studies of animals with uni‐ or bilateral renal nodules smaller than 3 cm that underwent both US and CT and that had a pathologically confirmed diagnosis were reviewed. Animals with renal cysts and infarcts were excluded. Recorded features for both modalities included the following: shape, size, number, localization, margins, renal profile. For CT only, recorded features also included attenuation (HU) and pattern of enhancement.  For US only, recorded features also included echogenicity, echostructure, and rate of visibility. Final diagnosis was obtained by cytology or histopathology. Using CT, lesions were identified in all 39 (100%) kidneys of 18 dogs and seven cats. Most lesions were multiple, cortical, well‐defined, iso‐attenuating (precontrast), hypo‐attenuating, and moderately enhancing (postcontrast). Using US, lesions were identified in 29 of 39 (74%) kidneys. Overall, nine (31%) lesions were poorly visible; 10 (26%) kidneys appeared normal; in 17 (59%) organs, lesions’ number was underestimated. Isoechoic, non‐protruding lesions were difficult to identify by US. Ultrasonography underestimated renal lesions compared to CT in 59% of the kidneys (P = 0.001). Final diagnoses included metastatic disease (n = 16), infiltration by feline lymphoma (n = 4), primary neoplasia (n = 3), and non‐neoplastic benign lesions (n = 2).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-8183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-8261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vru.13219</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36790748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>kidney ; metastases ; small animals</subject><ispartof>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound, 2023-05, Vol.64 (3), p.439-447</ispartof><rights>2023 American College of Veterinary Radiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd97797e456fca24d545114ba7400713f211adaa5d4fa6f326ae83f7520481213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd97797e456fca24d545114ba7400713f211adaa5d4fa6f326ae83f7520481213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6402-930X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianni, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marconato, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabattini, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caleri, Elvanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattolini, Mirko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camosci, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carozzi, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of sonographic and CT findings for the identification of renal nodules in dogs and cats</title><title>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</title><addtitle>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</addtitle><description>Ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) are used to diagnose neoplastic and non‐neoplastic focal renal lesions in dogs and cats; however, comparative studies between these two diagnostic tools are lacking. The aim of this retrospective, methods comparison study was to evaluate and compare the performance of US compared to CT in identifying at least one renal nodule in animals with confirmed focal renal lesions. Imaging studies of animals with uni‐ or bilateral renal nodules smaller than 3 cm that underwent both US and CT and that had a pathologically confirmed diagnosis were reviewed. Animals with renal cysts and infarcts were excluded. Recorded features for both modalities included the following: shape, size, number, localization, margins, renal profile. For CT only, recorded features also included attenuation (HU) and pattern of enhancement.  For US only, recorded features also included echogenicity, echostructure, and rate of visibility. Final diagnosis was obtained by cytology or histopathology. Using CT, lesions were identified in all 39 (100%) kidneys of 18 dogs and seven cats. Most lesions were multiple, cortical, well‐defined, iso‐attenuating (precontrast), hypo‐attenuating, and moderately enhancing (postcontrast). Using US, lesions were identified in 29 of 39 (74%) kidneys. Overall, nine (31%) lesions were poorly visible; 10 (26%) kidneys appeared normal; in 17 (59%) organs, lesions’ number was underestimated. Isoechoic, non‐protruding lesions were difficult to identify by US. Ultrasonography underestimated renal lesions compared to CT in 59% of the kidneys (P = 0.001). Final diagnoses included metastatic disease (n = 16), infiltration by feline lymphoma (n = 4), primary neoplasia (n = 3), and non‐neoplastic benign lesions (n = 2).</description><subject>kidney</subject><subject>metastases</subject><subject>small animals</subject><issn>1058-8183</issn><issn>1740-8261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AeQl7BI60ccJ0tU8ZIqIaGWbeTEdmuU2MFOQP17XALsmM3M4twrzQHgEqM5jrP48MMcU4KLIzDFPEVJTjJ8HG_E8iTHOZ2AsxDeECKME34KJjTjBeJpPgXV0rWd8CY4C52GcbmtF93O1FBYCZdrqI2Vxm4D1M7Dfqegkcr2Rpta9GZMeWVFA62TQ6MCNBZKF_lDPjLhHJxo0QR18bNnYHN_t14-Jqvnh6fl7SqpKWFFUsmC84KrlGW6FiSVLGUYp5WIDyGOqSYYCykEk6kWmaYkEyqnmjOC0hwTTGfgeuztvHsfVOjL1oRaNY2wyg2hJJxzhIqc04jejGjtXQhe6bLzphV-X2JUHpSWUWn5rTSyVz-1Q9Uq-Uf-OozAYgQ-TaP2_zeVry-bsfILF_OAAQ</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Rossi, Federica</creator><creator>Gianni, Beatrice</creator><creator>Marconato, Laura</creator><creator>Sabattini, Silvia</creator><creator>Caleri, Elvanessa</creator><creator>Mattolini, Mirko</creator><creator>Camosci, Veronica</creator><creator>Carozzi, Gregorio</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-930X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Comparison of sonographic and CT findings for the identification of renal nodules in dogs and cats</title><author>Rossi, Federica ; Gianni, Beatrice ; Marconato, Laura ; Sabattini, Silvia ; Caleri, Elvanessa ; Mattolini, Mirko ; Camosci, Veronica ; Carozzi, Gregorio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd97797e456fca24d545114ba7400713f211adaa5d4fa6f326ae83f7520481213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>kidney</topic><topic>metastases</topic><topic>small animals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Federica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianni, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marconato, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabattini, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caleri, Elvanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattolini, Mirko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camosci, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carozzi, Gregorio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossi, Federica</au><au>Gianni, Beatrice</au><au>Marconato, Laura</au><au>Sabattini, Silvia</au><au>Caleri, Elvanessa</au><au>Mattolini, Mirko</au><au>Camosci, Veronica</au><au>Carozzi, Gregorio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of sonographic and CT findings for the identification of renal nodules in dogs and cats</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>439-447</pages><issn>1058-8183</issn><eissn>1740-8261</eissn><abstract>Ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) are used to diagnose neoplastic and non‐neoplastic focal renal lesions in dogs and cats; however, comparative studies between these two diagnostic tools are lacking. The aim of this retrospective, methods comparison study was to evaluate and compare the performance of US compared to CT in identifying at least one renal nodule in animals with confirmed focal renal lesions. Imaging studies of animals with uni‐ or bilateral renal nodules smaller than 3 cm that underwent both US and CT and that had a pathologically confirmed diagnosis were reviewed. Animals with renal cysts and infarcts were excluded. Recorded features for both modalities included the following: shape, size, number, localization, margins, renal profile. For CT only, recorded features also included attenuation (HU) and pattern of enhancement.  For US only, recorded features also included echogenicity, echostructure, and rate of visibility. Final diagnosis was obtained by cytology or histopathology. Using CT, lesions were identified in all 39 (100%) kidneys of 18 dogs and seven cats. Most lesions were multiple, cortical, well‐defined, iso‐attenuating (precontrast), hypo‐attenuating, and moderately enhancing (postcontrast). Using US, lesions were identified in 29 of 39 (74%) kidneys. Overall, nine (31%) lesions were poorly visible; 10 (26%) kidneys appeared normal; in 17 (59%) organs, lesions’ number was underestimated. Isoechoic, non‐protruding lesions were difficult to identify by US. Ultrasonography underestimated renal lesions compared to CT in 59% of the kidneys (P = 0.001). Final diagnoses included metastatic disease (n = 16), infiltration by feline lymphoma (n = 4), primary neoplasia (n = 3), and non‐neoplastic benign lesions (n = 2).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>36790748</pmid><doi>10.1111/vru.13219</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-930X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-8183
ispartof Veterinary radiology & ultrasound, 2023-05, Vol.64 (3), p.439-447
issn 1058-8183
1740-8261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2777009873
source Wiley
subjects kidney
metastases
small animals
title Comparison of sonographic and CT findings for the identification of renal nodules in dogs and cats
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A10%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20sonographic%20and%20CT%20findings%20for%20the%20identification%20of%20renal%20nodules%20in%20dogs%20and%20cats&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20radiology%20&%20ultrasound&rft.au=Rossi,%20Federica&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=439-447&rft.issn=1058-8183&rft.eissn=1740-8261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vru.13219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2777009873%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3259-bd97797e456fca24d545114ba7400713f211adaa5d4fa6f326ae83f7520481213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777009873&rft_id=info:pmid/36790748&rfr_iscdi=true