Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients

Objectives: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. Methods: Two hundred videos were id...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology rhinology & laryngology, 2023-11, Vol.132 (11), p.1349-1354
Main Authors: Elliot, Zachary T., Lu, Joseph S., Campbell, Daniel, Xiao, Kevin B., Christopher, Vanessa, Krein, Howard, Heffelfinger, Ryan
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3f6124c73d647c40034b8c1a1031568d247023f72e2295aae8138e0cd8ece9d93
container_end_page 1354
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1349
container_title Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology
container_volume 132
creator Elliot, Zachary T.
Lu, Joseph S.
Campbell, Daniel
Xiao, Kevin B.
Christopher, Vanessa
Krein, Howard
Heffelfinger, Ryan
description Objectives: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. Methods: Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: “facelift surgery,” “facelift surgery what to expect,” “facelift surgery patient education,” and “what is facelift surgery.” Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. Results: One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 ± 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 ± 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 ± 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R = .49, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00034894231154410
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2777010616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00034894231154410</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2777010616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3f6124c73d647c40034b8c1a1031568d247023f72e2295aae8138e0cd8ece9d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotlY_gBfJ0cvW_NtN9ihiVSgoWkVPa5qdLVu2G002hX57s7Z6ETwNM_N7j5mH0CklY0qlvCCEcKFywTilqRCU7KEhzQVPUsle99Gw3yc9MEBH3i9jK1LCDtGAZ1IpIfgQvV-vdRN0V7cL_GbDLMwBv9QlWI9tiyfaQFNXHX4KbgFugyvr-mGtG_wIy7CGNkojqD3WceJtcAa-qYe4gLbzx-ig0o2Hk10doefJ9ezqNpne39xdXU4Tw3LWJbzKKBNG8jIT0oj-sbkyVFPCaZqpkglJGK8kA8byVGtQlCsgplRgIC9zPkLnW98PZz8D-K5Y1T5e3-gWbPAFk1ISSjKaRZRuUeOs9w6q4sPVK-02BSVFH2zxJ9ioOdvZh_kKyl_FT5IRGG8BrxdQLGMQbXz3H8cvafx_Nw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2777010616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Elliot, Zachary T. ; Lu, Joseph S. ; Campbell, Daniel ; Xiao, Kevin B. ; Christopher, Vanessa ; Krein, Howard ; Heffelfinger, Ryan</creator><creatorcontrib>Elliot, Zachary T. ; Lu, Joseph S. ; Campbell, Daniel ; Xiao, Kevin B. ; Christopher, Vanessa ; Krein, Howard ; Heffelfinger, Ryan</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. Methods: Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: “facelift surgery,” “facelift surgery what to expect,” “facelift surgery patient education,” and “what is facelift surgery.” Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. Results: One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 ± 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 ± 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 ± 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R = .49, P &lt; .05) but did not correlate with other quality criteria. Conclusions: For patients undergoing facelift surgery, there are limited educational videos on YouTube with few videos detailing indications, alternatives, complications, and the postoperative course. YouTube is a growing resource for patient education and opportunities exist for medical institutions to produce higher-quality videos for prospective patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-572X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00034894231154410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36788443</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Annals of otology, rhinology &amp; laryngology, 2023-11, Vol.132 (11), p.1349-1354</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3f6124c73d647c40034b8c1a1031568d247023f72e2295aae8138e0cd8ece9d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5619-6191 ; 0000-0002-3454-3156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36788443$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elliot, Zachary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krein, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffelfinger, Ryan</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients</title><title>Annals of otology, rhinology &amp; laryngology</title><addtitle>Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol</addtitle><description>Objectives: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. Methods: Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: “facelift surgery,” “facelift surgery what to expect,” “facelift surgery patient education,” and “what is facelift surgery.” Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. Results: One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 ± 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 ± 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 ± 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R = .49, P &lt; .05) but did not correlate with other quality criteria. Conclusions: For patients undergoing facelift surgery, there are limited educational videos on YouTube with few videos detailing indications, alternatives, complications, and the postoperative course. YouTube is a growing resource for patient education and opportunities exist for medical institutions to produce higher-quality videos for prospective patients.</description><issn>0003-4894</issn><issn>1943-572X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotlY_gBfJ0cvW_NtN9ihiVSgoWkVPa5qdLVu2G002hX57s7Z6ETwNM_N7j5mH0CklY0qlvCCEcKFywTilqRCU7KEhzQVPUsle99Gw3yc9MEBH3i9jK1LCDtGAZ1IpIfgQvV-vdRN0V7cL_GbDLMwBv9QlWI9tiyfaQFNXHX4KbgFugyvr-mGtG_wIy7CGNkojqD3WceJtcAa-qYe4gLbzx-ig0o2Hk10doefJ9ezqNpne39xdXU4Tw3LWJbzKKBNG8jIT0oj-sbkyVFPCaZqpkglJGK8kA8byVGtQlCsgplRgIC9zPkLnW98PZz8D-K5Y1T5e3-gWbPAFk1ISSjKaRZRuUeOs9w6q4sPVK-02BSVFH2zxJ9ioOdvZh_kKyl_FT5IRGG8BrxdQLGMQbXz3H8cvafx_Nw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Elliot, Zachary T.</creator><creator>Lu, Joseph S.</creator><creator>Campbell, Daniel</creator><creator>Xiao, Kevin B.</creator><creator>Christopher, Vanessa</creator><creator>Krein, Howard</creator><creator>Heffelfinger, Ryan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-6191</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3454-3156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients</title><author>Elliot, Zachary T. ; Lu, Joseph S. ; Campbell, Daniel ; Xiao, Kevin B. ; Christopher, Vanessa ; Krein, Howard ; Heffelfinger, Ryan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3f6124c73d647c40034b8c1a1031568d247023f72e2295aae8138e0cd8ece9d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliot, Zachary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Joseph S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Kevin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christopher, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krein, Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffelfinger, Ryan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of otology, rhinology &amp; laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliot, Zachary T.</au><au>Lu, Joseph S.</au><au>Campbell, Daniel</au><au>Xiao, Kevin B.</au><au>Christopher, Vanessa</au><au>Krein, Howard</au><au>Heffelfinger, Ryan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of otology, rhinology &amp; laryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1349</spage><epage>1354</epage><pages>1349-1354</pages><issn>0003-4894</issn><eissn>1943-572X</eissn><abstract>Objectives: This study evaluated the content and patient educational quality of YouTube videos on facelift surgery for facial rejuvenation. This study investigated the relationship between education quality compared to video content, video metrics, and popularity. Methods: Two hundred videos were identified across 4 search terms: “facelift surgery,” “facelift surgery what to expect,” “facelift surgery patient education,” and “what is facelift surgery.” Unrelated videos, operating room recordings, medical professional lectures, non-English, non-audio, and testimonials were excluded from review. Video quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) (range: 1-5), modified DISCERN score (range: 5-25), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (range: 0-4). Secondary outcomes included upload source, video metrics (views, likes, dislikes, duration, days since upload, comments), and Video Power Indexto measure popularity. The first 10 comments on videos were characterized as positive, neutral, or negative. Results: One hundred forty-three videos were excluded (43 did not meet criteria, 100 duplicates), and 57 videos were included. Fifty-five videos (96.5%) were uploaded by private medical practices. Overall video quality was poor across all 3 scoring systems: GQS (2.92 ± 1.14), modified DISCERN (13.03 ± 3.64), and JAMA Benchmark Criteria (1.78 ± 0.52). Popularity positively correlated with JAMA Benchmark Criteria (R = .49, P &lt; .05) but did not correlate with other quality criteria. Conclusions: For patients undergoing facelift surgery, there are limited educational videos on YouTube with few videos detailing indications, alternatives, complications, and the postoperative course. YouTube is a growing resource for patient education and opportunities exist for medical institutions to produce higher-quality videos for prospective patients.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>36788443</pmid><doi>10.1177/00034894231154410</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-6191</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3454-3156</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4894
ispartof Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology, 2023-11, Vol.132 (11), p.1349-1354
issn 0003-4894
1943-572X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2777010616
source Sage Journals Online
title Evaluating YouTube Videos on Facelift Surgery for Facial Rejuvenation as a Resource for Patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20YouTube%20Videos%20on%20Facelift%20Surgery%20for%20Facial%20Rejuvenation%20as%20a%20Resource%20for%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20otology,%20rhinology%20&%20laryngology&rft.au=Elliot,%20Zachary%20T.&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1349&rft.epage=1354&rft.pages=1349-1354&rft.issn=0003-4894&rft.eissn=1943-572X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00034894231154410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2777010616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-3f6124c73d647c40034b8c1a1031568d247023f72e2295aae8138e0cd8ece9d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2777010616&rft_id=info:pmid/36788443&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00034894231154410&rfr_iscdi=true