Loading…

Comparing Outcomes Between Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Classical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Patients with classic low-flow low-gradient (cLFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) have a poor prognosis but still benefit from aortic valve replacement. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the choice between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2023-04, Vol.192, p.206-211
Main Authors: Patel, Kush P., Vandermolen, Sebastian, Cooper, Jackie, Pugliese, Francesca, Ozkor, Mick, Kennon, Simon, Mathur, Anthony, Khanji, Mohammed Y., Mullen, Michael J., Baumbach, Andreas, Awad, Wael I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Patients with classic low-flow low-gradient (cLFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) have a poor prognosis but still benefit from aortic valve replacement. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the choice between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study compared procedural and midterm outcomes in patients with cLFLG AS between TAVR and SAVR. Patients with cLFLG AS, defined as an aortic valve area ≤1 cm2, mean gradient
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.020