Loading…

Comparison between digital superimposition and microcomputed tomography methods of fit assessment of removable partial denture frameworks

The fit of removable partial denture frameworks should be assessed to optimize clinical adaptation. Potential discrepancies between framework and supporting structures are typically precisely measured with negative subtracts and high-resolution equipment. The growth of computer-aided engineering tec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2024-03, Vol.131 (3), p.479-486
Main Authors: Conceição, Pedro, Portugal, Jaime, Franco, Margarida, Alves, Nuno M., Marques, Duarte, Neves, Cristina B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The fit of removable partial denture frameworks should be assessed to optimize clinical adaptation. Potential discrepancies between framework and supporting structures are typically precisely measured with negative subtracts and high-resolution equipment. The growth of computer-aided engineering technology allows the development of new methods for the direct evaluation of discrepancies. However, how the methods compare is unclear. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare 2 digital methods of fit assessment based on direct digital superimposition and microcomputed tomography indirect analysis. Twelve cobalt chromium removable partial denture frameworks were fabricated by conventional lost-wax casting or additive manufacturing techniques. The thickness of the gap between occlusal rests and respective definitive cast rest seats (n=34) was evaluated by using 2 different digital methods. Silicone elastomer impressions of the gaps were obtained, and microcomputed tomography measurements were used as controls for validation purposes. Digitization of the framework, the respective definitive cast, and the combination was followed by digital superimposition and direct measurements with the Geomagic Control X software program. Because normality and homogeneity of variance were not verified (Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, P
ISSN:0022-3913
1097-6841
DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.02.002