Loading…

Less than 1.5cm shortening in clavicle midshaft fracture has long-term functional impact

Mediolateral shortening is a risk in treatment of clavicle shaft fracture, and can lead to scapular dyskinesis and shoulder dysfunction. Many studies advocated surgical treatment if shortening exceeds 15mm. Clavicle shaft shortening of less than 15mm has negative impact on shoulder function at more...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2023-09, Vol.109 (5), p.103590-103590, Article 103590
Main Authors: Pradel, Sarah, Brunaud, Maxime, Coulomb, Rémy, Kouyoumdjian, Pascal, Marès, Olivier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Mediolateral shortening is a risk in treatment of clavicle shaft fracture, and can lead to scapular dyskinesis and shoulder dysfunction. Many studies advocated surgical treatment if shortening exceeds 15mm. Clavicle shaft shortening of less than 15mm has negative impact on shoulder function at more than 1 year's follow-up. A retrospective case-control comparative study was performed, with assessment by an independent observer. Clavicle length was measured on frontal radiographs showing both clavicles, and the ratio between the healthy and affected sides was calculated. Functional impact was assessed on Quick-DASH. Scapular dyskinesis was analyzed by global antepulsion on Kibler's classification. In total, 217 files were retrieved for a 6-year period. Clinical assessment was performed for 20 patients managed non-operatively and 20 patients managed by locking plate fixation, at a mean 37.5months’ follow-up (range: 12–69months). Mean Quick-DASH score was significantly higher in the non-operated group: 11.363 [0–50] versus 2.045 [0–11.36] (p=0.0092). Pearson ρ correlation between percentage shortening and Quick-DASH score was −0.3956 [95% CI: −0.6295; −0.0959] (p=0.012). Clavicle length ratio differed significantly between groups: operated group, +2.2% [−5.1%; +17%] for 0.34cm; non-operated group, −8.28% [−17.3%; −0.7%] for 1.38cm (p8% radiological shortening (1.3cm) to avoid medium- and long-term complications in shoulder function. III; case-control study.
ISSN:1877-0568
1877-0568
DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103590