Instruments to assess appropriateness of hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

• Published in: Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2023-07, Vol.31 (7), p.847-864
• Main Authors: Pacheco-Brousseau, L., Stacey, D., Desmeules, F., Ben Amor, S., Lambert, D., Tanguay, E., Hillaby, A., Bechiau, C., Charette, M., Poitras, S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Assessment; Decision-making; Evaluation; Knee arthroplasty; Osteoarthritis; Total hip arthroplasty
• ISSN: 1063-4584; 1522-9653
• DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.02.077

To assess criteria and psychometric properties of instruments for assessing appropriateness of elective joint arthroplasty (JA) for adults with primary hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). A systematic review guided by Cochrane methods and PRISMA guidelines. Studies were searched in five databases. Eligible articles include all study designs developing, testing, and/or using an instrument to assess JA appropriateness. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data. Instruments were compared with Hawker et al. JA consensus criteria. Psychometric properties of instruments were described and appraised guided by Fitzpatrick's and COSMIN approaches. Of 55 instruments included, none met all Hawker et al. JA consensus criteria. Criteria the most met were pain (n = 50), function (n = 49), quality of life (n = 33), and radiography (n = 24). Criteria the least met were clinical evidence of OA (n = 18), expectations (n = 15), readiness for surgery (n = 11), conservative treatments (n = 8), and patient/surgeon agree benefits outweigh risks (n = 0). Instrument by Arden et al. met the most criteria (6 of 9). The most tested psychometric properties were appropriateness (n = 55), face/content validity (n = 55), predictive validity (n = 29), construct validity and feasibility (n = 24). The least tested psychometric properties were intra-rater reliability (n = 3), internal consistency (n = 5), and inter-rater reliability (n = 13). Instruments by Gutacker et al. and Osborne et al. met the most psychometric properties (4 of 10). Most instruments included traditional criteria for assessing JA appropriateness but did not include a trial of conservative treatments or shared decision-making elements. There was limited evidence on psychometric properties.