Statistical shape modeling of the large acetabular defect in hip revision surgery

The assessment of three‐dimensional bony defects is important to inform the surgical planning of hip reconstruction. Mirroring of the contralateral side has been previously used to measure the hip center of rotation (CoR). However, the contralateral side may not be useful when diseased or replaced....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2023-09, Vol.41 (9), p.2016-2025
Main Authors: De Angelis, Sara, Henckel, Johann, Bergiers, Sean, Hothi, Harry, Di Laura, Anna, Hart, Alister
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acetabulum - surgery
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods
custom implants
Hip Prosthesis
hip reconstruction surgery
Humans
Paprosky IIIB defects
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
statistical shape modeling
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The assessment of three‐dimensional bony defects is important to inform the surgical planning of hip reconstruction. Mirroring of the contralateral side has been previously used to measure the hip center of rotation (CoR). However, the contralateral side may not be useful when diseased or replaced. Statistical Shape Models (SSMs) can aid reconstruction of patient anatomy. Previous studies have been limited to computational models only or small patient cohorts. We used SSM as a tool to help derive landmarks that are often absent in hip joints of patients with large acetabular defects. Our aim was to compare the reconstructed pelvis with patients who have previously undergone hip revision. This retrospective cohort study involved 38 patients with Paprosky type IIIB defects. An SSM was built on 50 healthy pelvises and used to virtually reconstruct the native pelvic morphology for all cases. The outcome measures were the difference in CoR for (1) SSM versus diseased hip, (2) SSM versus plan, and (3) SSM versus contralateral healthy hip. The median differences in CoR were 31.17 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 43.80–19.87 mm), 8.53 mm (IQR: 12.76–5.74 mm), and 7.84 mm (IQR: 10.13–5.13 mm), respectively. No statistical difference (p > 0.05) was found between the SSM versus plan and the SSM versus contralateral CoRs. Our findings show that the SSM model can be used to reconstruct the absent bony landmarks of patients with significant lysis regardless of the defect severity, hence aiding the surgical planning of hip reconstruction and implant design.
ISSN:0736-0266
1554-527X
DOI:10.1002/jor.25547