Pressure therapy for scars: Myth or reality? A systematic review

• Published in: Burns 2023-06, Vol.49 (4), p.741-756
• Main Authors: De Decker, Ignace, Beeckman, Anse, Hoeksema, Henk, De Mey, Kimberly, Verbelen, Jozef, De Coninck, Petra, Blondeel, Phillip, Speeckaert, Marijn M., Monstrey, Stan, Claes, Karel E.Y.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: BURN; Burns - therapy; Cicatrix, Hypertrophic - prevention & control; Cohort Studies; Humans; Hypertrophy; Pressure garments; Pressure therapy; Scar; Scar management; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0305-4179; 1879-1409
• DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2023.03.007

Hypertrophic scarring is a deviate occurrence after wound closure and is a common burn sequela. The mainstay of scar treatment consists of a trifold approach: hydration, UV-protection and the use of pressure garments with or without extra paddings or inlays to provide additional pressure. Pressure therapy has been reported to induce a state of hypoxia and to reduce the expression pattern of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), therefore limiting the activity of fibroblasts. However, pressure therapy is said to be largely based on empirical evidence and a lot of controversy concerning the effectiveness still prevails. Many variables influencing its effectivity, such as adherence to treatment, wear time, wash frequency, number of available pressure garment sets and amount of pressure remain only partially understood. This systematic review aims to give a complete and comprehensive overview of the currently available clinical evidence of pressure therapy. A systematic search for articles concerning the use of pressure therapy in the treatment and prevention of scars was performed in 3 different databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library) according to the PRISMA statement. Only case series, case-control studies, cohort studies, and RCTs were included. The qualitative assessment was done by 2 separate reviewers with the appropriate quality assessment tools. The search yielded 1458 articles. After deduplication and removal of ineligible records, 1280 records were screened on title and abstract. Full text screening was done for 23 articles and ultimately 17 articles were included. Comparisons between pressure or no pressure, low vs high pressure, short vs long duration and early vs late start of treatment were investigated. There is sufficient evidence that indicates the value of prophylactic and curative use of pressure therapy for scar management. The evidence suggests that pressure therapy is capable of improving scar color, thickness, pain, and scar quality in general. Evidence also recommends commencing pressure therapy prior to 2 months after injury, and using a minimal pressure of 20–25 mmHg. To be effective, treatment duration should be at least 12 months and even preferably up to 18–24 months. These findings were in line with the best evidence statement by Sharp et al. (2016). •There is sufficient evidence to support the prophylactic and curative use of pressure therapy for scar management.•Pressure therapy is capable of improving scar color, thi