An evidence synthesis on perioperative Handoffs: A call for balanced sociotechnical solutions

• Published in: International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2023-06, Vol.174, p.105038-105038, Article 105038
• Main Authors: Abraham, Joanna, Duffy, Caoimhe, Kandasamy, Madhumitha, France, Dan, Greilich, Philip
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Checklist; Communication; Continuity of Patient Care; Handoff; Handover; Humans; Language; Patient Handoff; Surgery; Systematic Review; Transitions in Care
• ISSN: 1386-5056; 1872-8243
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105038

•We elucidate the complex inter-related factors (enablers and barriers) related to perioperative handoff safety.•We need to design holistic sociotechnical solutions that can promote patient-centered handoff safety and quality.•Future studies should assess surgical patient handoffs across the operative phases to and ascertain its impact on clinical outcomes. Perioperative handoffs interconnect the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases underlying surgical care to maintain care continuity —yet are prone to coordination and communication failures. To synthesize evidence on factors affecting the safety and quality of perioperative handoff conduct and process. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL was conducted to include observational, descriptive studies of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative handoffs published in English language, peer-reviewed journals. Data analysis was informed by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework describing the relationship between the work-system, work processes, and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Scoring System. Twenty-three studies were included. Eighteen studies focused on postoperative handoffs, with one on preoperative, three on intraoperative and only one that looked at preoperative/postoperative handoffs combined. The SEIPS framework elucidated the complex inter-related factors (enablers and barriers) related to perioperative handoff safety. While some studies found that the use of standardized handoff tools and protocols and interdisciplinary teamwork were frequently-reported enablers, other studies identified the lack of structured handoff tools and protocols, poor teamwork and communication, and improper use of documentation tools were top-cited barriers affecting handoff quality. Suggestions to ensure handoff safety and quality included implementing structured handoff checklists and protocols and building interprofessional teamwork competencies for effective communication. Our review highlights an urgency to develop more holistic sociotechnical solutions that can create and sustain a balance between technical innovations in tools and technologies and the non-technical interventions/training needed to improve interpersonal relations and teamwork competencies – taken together, can improve the quality and safety of perioperative handoff practice.