Achieving cardiac rehabilitation uptake targets: What is the value case for commissioners? A UK case-study

• Published in: International journal of cardiology 2023-06, Vol.380, p.29-34
• Main Authors: Hinde, S., Harrison, A.S., Bojke, L., Doherty, P.J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiac Rehabilitation; Commissioning; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Delivery of Health Care; Economic evaluation; Humans; Inequality; United Kingdom - epidemiology; Uptake
• ISSN: 0167-5273; 1874-1754
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.03.041

Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) has become an established intervention to support patient recovery after a cardiac event, with evidence supporting its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in improving patient health and reducing future burden on healthcare systems. However, this evidence has focussed on the national value case for CR rather than at the point at which it is commissioned. This analysis uses the UK as a case-study to explore variation in current CR engagement and disassemble the value case from a commissioner perspective. Using data collected by the National Audit of CR (NACR), and an existing model of cost-effectiveness, we present details on the current level of CR uptake by commissioning region (Specialist Clinical Networks) in light of the current UK target of achieving 85% uptake. We then interrogate the value case for achieving the target at a commissioner level, highlighting the expected profile of health benefits and healthcare system costs over the long-term. Importantly we consider where this may differ from the national value case. Each commissioning region has a unique level of CR uptake and sociodemographic profile. Concurrently, the value case for commissioning CR relies on the upfront cost of the service being offset by long-term healthcare savings, and health improvements. The shift in the UK and internationally to more localised commissioning necessitates evidence of cost-effectiveness that better reflects the realities of those decision makers. This paper provides vital additional data to facilitate such commissioners to understand the value case in increasing CR uptake in line with national policy. •Many nations are aiming to increase rates of CR uptake.•Commissioning of services is complex and different from national decision making.•The challenges in reaching targets are different for each region.•It is important to consider equity when commissioning CR.