Physico‐chemical characteristics and biodegradability of primary effluent and particulate matter removed by microscreens

In this study, the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of raw wastewater were compared with the liquid and solid streams generated by a primary clarifier (PC), a rotating belt filter (RBF, 350 μm), and a drum filter (DF, 60 μm) and series (SER) combination of an RBF with a PC or a DF...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water environment research 2023-04, Vol.95 (4), p.e10854-n/a
Main Authors: Alizadeh, Sanaz, Chowdhury, Pankaj, Ghodsi, Vahid, Giaccherini, Francesca, Sarathy, Siva, Santoro, Domenico, Comeau, Yves
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Belt filters
Biodegradability
Biodegradation
Chemical oxygen demand
Clarifiers
Configurations
Design criteria
Drum filters
Effluents
Fractionation
Influents
Methane
micro‐sieving
Organic matter
organic matter recovery
Oxygen
Oxygen requirement
Particulate Matter
primary treatment
Raw wastewater
Resource recovery
Retrofitting
Rotation
Sewage - chemistry
Sludge
Solid suspensions
Suspended particulate matter
Total suspended solids
Volatile solids
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Wastewater
Wastewater composition
Water resources
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-d6c4a543ecadc4204bc5b26fd9e85330f25f534b9f84e7004d30108ccd5ab5263
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-d6c4a543ecadc4204bc5b26fd9e85330f25f534b9f84e7004d30108ccd5ab5263
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page e10854
container_title Water environment research
container_volume 95
creator Alizadeh, Sanaz
Chowdhury, Pankaj
Ghodsi, Vahid
Giaccherini, Francesca
Sarathy, Siva
Santoro, Domenico
Comeau, Yves
description In this study, the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of raw wastewater were compared with the liquid and solid streams generated by a primary clarifier (PC), a rotating belt filter (RBF, 350 μm), and a drum filter (DF, 60 μm) and series (SER) combination of an RBF with a PC or a DF using pilot‐scale primary treatment units. The RBF removed about 36% of the influent total suspended solids. The DF and PC yielded an influent total suspended solid removal of 47% to 55% in both individual (parallel) and SER configurations. The size fractionation and chemical characterizations of the liquid fractions indicated a significant change in the wastewater composition in both filter configurations with no variation in the biodegradability of liquid fractions. The solids recovered by RBF had a higher total solids (TS) concentration and a higher volatile solids (VS) content (0.92 g VS/g TS) than that of DF and PC treatments (0.58 to 0.84 g VS/g TS). DF and PC sludge demonstrated a higher biodegradability rate (k1; 0.11 d−1 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wer.10854
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2791381543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2791381543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-d6c4a543ecadc4204bc5b26fd9e85330f25f534b9f84e7004d30108ccd5ab5263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kclKLDEUhoMozgtfQAJurovSpJJUp5YiTiAoorgMqeTEjtTQJlVXypWP4DP6JEa7dSG4yll8-c7wI7RDyQElJD98hpAKKfgSWqdC8GwiGF1ONSloxhlha2gjxkdCaJ4TvorWWFEWgjC5jl6up2P0pnt_fTNTaLzRNTZTHbTpIfjYexOxbi2ufGfhIWirK1_7fsSdw7PgGx1GDM7VA7T9FzjTIX0aat0DbnSfLDhA0_2H5BhxahC6aAJAG7fQitN1hO3Fu4nuTk9uj8-zy6uzi-Ojy8wwKXlmC8O14AyMtoan-SsjqrxwtgQpGCMuF04wXpVOcpgQwi0j6RjGWKErkRdsE_2be2ehexog9qrx0UBd6xa6Iap8UlImaWqR0L1f6GM3hDZNp3JJhCxFSXmi9ufU5y4xgFOLSyhK1GcgKgWivgJJ7O7COFQN2B_yO4EEHM6BZ1_D-LdJ3Z_czJUf4PiYBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2805895914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physico‐chemical characteristics and biodegradability of primary effluent and particulate matter removed by microscreens</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Alizadeh, Sanaz ; Chowdhury, Pankaj ; Ghodsi, Vahid ; Giaccherini, Francesca ; Sarathy, Siva ; Santoro, Domenico ; Comeau, Yves</creator><creatorcontrib>Alizadeh, Sanaz ; Chowdhury, Pankaj ; Ghodsi, Vahid ; Giaccherini, Francesca ; Sarathy, Siva ; Santoro, Domenico ; Comeau, Yves</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of raw wastewater were compared with the liquid and solid streams generated by a primary clarifier (PC), a rotating belt filter (RBF, 350 μm), and a drum filter (DF, 60 μm) and series (SER) combination of an RBF with a PC or a DF using pilot‐scale primary treatment units. The RBF removed about 36% of the influent total suspended solids. The DF and PC yielded an influent total suspended solid removal of 47% to 55% in both individual (parallel) and SER configurations. The size fractionation and chemical characterizations of the liquid fractions indicated a significant change in the wastewater composition in both filter configurations with no variation in the biodegradability of liquid fractions. The solids recovered by RBF had a higher total solids (TS) concentration and a higher volatile solids (VS) content (0.92 g VS/g TS) than that of DF and PC treatments (0.58 to 0.84 g VS/g TS). DF and PC sludge demonstrated a higher biodegradability rate (k1; 0.11 d−1 &lt; k1 &lt; 0.20 d−1) than solids recovered by RBF (0.09 d−1). The retained solids in the SER configuration demonstrated a significantly lower theoretical biochemical methane potential than the parallel configuration, likely due to the presence of smaller particles with a significantly higher ratio of particulate chemical oxygen demand over volatile suspended solids (1.86 to 2.40 g chemical oxygen demand/g volatile suspended solids). These results indicated that the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of liquid and solids from different filter configurations are required to determine design criteria to upgrade or retrofit water resource recovery facilities using an RBF or a DF. Practitioner Points A rotating belt filter (RBF) removed less solids than a drum filter (DF) or a primary clarifier (PC). A series configuration of an RBF with either a DF or PC resulted in an effluent with a lower proportion of slowly biodegradable organic matter than in a parallel configuration. Solids from an RBF, a DF, or a PC had similar theoretical biochemical methane potential. Quantitative physical (including size fractionation), chemical, and biological characterizations of treated wastewater and solids removed by micro‐sieving technologies are required to optimize design criteria of units located downstream of these technologies for further liquid and solids treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wer.10854</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36965038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Belt filters ; Biodegradability ; Biodegradation ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Clarifiers ; Configurations ; Design criteria ; Drum filters ; Effluents ; Fractionation ; Influents ; Methane ; micro‐sieving ; Organic matter ; organic matter recovery ; Oxygen ; Oxygen requirement ; Particulate Matter ; primary treatment ; Raw wastewater ; Resource recovery ; Retrofitting ; Rotation ; Sewage - chemistry ; Sludge ; Solid suspensions ; Suspended particulate matter ; Total suspended solids ; Volatile solids ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewater ; Wastewater composition ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 2023-04, Vol.95 (4), p.e10854-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Water Environment Federation.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Water Environment Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Water Environment Federation.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-d6c4a543ecadc4204bc5b26fd9e85330f25f534b9f84e7004d30108ccd5ab5263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-d6c4a543ecadc4204bc5b26fd9e85330f25f534b9f84e7004d30108ccd5ab5263</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4704-2884 ; 0000-0002-2925-7833</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36965038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alizadeh, Sanaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghodsi, Vahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giaccherini, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarathy, Siva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Yves</creatorcontrib><title>Physico‐chemical characteristics and biodegradability of primary effluent and particulate matter removed by microscreens</title><title>Water environment research</title><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><description>In this study, the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of raw wastewater were compared with the liquid and solid streams generated by a primary clarifier (PC), a rotating belt filter (RBF, 350 μm), and a drum filter (DF, 60 μm) and series (SER) combination of an RBF with a PC or a DF using pilot‐scale primary treatment units. The RBF removed about 36% of the influent total suspended solids. The DF and PC yielded an influent total suspended solid removal of 47% to 55% in both individual (parallel) and SER configurations. The size fractionation and chemical characterizations of the liquid fractions indicated a significant change in the wastewater composition in both filter configurations with no variation in the biodegradability of liquid fractions. The solids recovered by RBF had a higher total solids (TS) concentration and a higher volatile solids (VS) content (0.92 g VS/g TS) than that of DF and PC treatments (0.58 to 0.84 g VS/g TS). DF and PC sludge demonstrated a higher biodegradability rate (k1; 0.11 d−1 &lt; k1 &lt; 0.20 d−1) than solids recovered by RBF (0.09 d−1). The retained solids in the SER configuration demonstrated a significantly lower theoretical biochemical methane potential than the parallel configuration, likely due to the presence of smaller particles with a significantly higher ratio of particulate chemical oxygen demand over volatile suspended solids (1.86 to 2.40 g chemical oxygen demand/g volatile suspended solids). These results indicated that the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of liquid and solids from different filter configurations are required to determine design criteria to upgrade or retrofit water resource recovery facilities using an RBF or a DF. Practitioner Points A rotating belt filter (RBF) removed less solids than a drum filter (DF) or a primary clarifier (PC). A series configuration of an RBF with either a DF or PC resulted in an effluent with a lower proportion of slowly biodegradable organic matter than in a parallel configuration. Solids from an RBF, a DF, or a PC had similar theoretical biochemical methane potential. Quantitative physical (including size fractionation), chemical, and biological characterizations of treated wastewater and solids removed by micro‐sieving technologies are required to optimize design criteria of units located downstream of these technologies for further liquid and solids treatment.</description><subject>Belt filters</subject><subject>Biodegradability</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Clarifiers</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Design criteria</subject><subject>Drum filters</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Influents</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>micro‐sieving</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>organic matter recovery</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen requirement</subject><subject>Particulate Matter</subject><subject>primary treatment</subject><subject>Raw wastewater</subject><subject>Resource recovery</subject><subject>Retrofitting</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Sewage - chemistry</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Solid suspensions</subject><subject>Suspended particulate matter</subject><subject>Total suspended solids</subject><subject>Volatile solids</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater composition</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kclKLDEUhoMozgtfQAJurovSpJJUp5YiTiAoorgMqeTEjtTQJlVXypWP4DP6JEa7dSG4yll8-c7wI7RDyQElJD98hpAKKfgSWqdC8GwiGF1ONSloxhlha2gjxkdCaJ4TvorWWFEWgjC5jl6up2P0pnt_fTNTaLzRNTZTHbTpIfjYexOxbi2ufGfhIWirK1_7fsSdw7PgGx1GDM7VA7T9FzjTIX0aat0DbnSfLDhA0_2H5BhxahC6aAJAG7fQitN1hO3Fu4nuTk9uj8-zy6uzi-Ojy8wwKXlmC8O14AyMtoan-SsjqrxwtgQpGCMuF04wXpVOcpgQwi0j6RjGWKErkRdsE_2be2ehexog9qrx0UBd6xa6Iap8UlImaWqR0L1f6GM3hDZNp3JJhCxFSXmi9ufU5y4xgFOLSyhK1GcgKgWivgJJ7O7COFQN2B_yO4EEHM6BZ1_D-LdJ3Z_czJUf4PiYBQ</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Alizadeh, Sanaz</creator><creator>Chowdhury, Pankaj</creator><creator>Ghodsi, Vahid</creator><creator>Giaccherini, Francesca</creator><creator>Sarathy, Siva</creator><creator>Santoro, Domenico</creator><creator>Comeau, Yves</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4704-2884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-7833</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Physico‐chemical characteristics and biodegradability of primary effluent and particulate matter removed by microscreens</title><author>Alizadeh, Sanaz ; Chowdhury, Pankaj ; Ghodsi, Vahid ; Giaccherini, Francesca ; Sarathy, Siva ; Santoro, Domenico ; Comeau, Yves</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-d6c4a543ecadc4204bc5b26fd9e85330f25f534b9f84e7004d30108ccd5ab5263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Belt filters</topic><topic>Biodegradability</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Clarifiers</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Design criteria</topic><topic>Drum filters</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Influents</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>micro‐sieving</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>organic matter recovery</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen requirement</topic><topic>Particulate Matter</topic><topic>primary treatment</topic><topic>Raw wastewater</topic><topic>Resource recovery</topic><topic>Retrofitting</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Sewage - chemistry</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Solid suspensions</topic><topic>Suspended particulate matter</topic><topic>Total suspended solids</topic><topic>Volatile solids</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater composition</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alizadeh, Sanaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chowdhury, Pankaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghodsi, Vahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giaccherini, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarathy, Siva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Yves</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alizadeh, Sanaz</au><au>Chowdhury, Pankaj</au><au>Ghodsi, Vahid</au><au>Giaccherini, Francesca</au><au>Sarathy, Siva</au><au>Santoro, Domenico</au><au>Comeau, Yves</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physico‐chemical characteristics and biodegradability of primary effluent and particulate matter removed by microscreens</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Environ Res</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e10854</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e10854-n/a</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>In this study, the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of raw wastewater were compared with the liquid and solid streams generated by a primary clarifier (PC), a rotating belt filter (RBF, 350 μm), and a drum filter (DF, 60 μm) and series (SER) combination of an RBF with a PC or a DF using pilot‐scale primary treatment units. The RBF removed about 36% of the influent total suspended solids. The DF and PC yielded an influent total suspended solid removal of 47% to 55% in both individual (parallel) and SER configurations. The size fractionation and chemical characterizations of the liquid fractions indicated a significant change in the wastewater composition in both filter configurations with no variation in the biodegradability of liquid fractions. The solids recovered by RBF had a higher total solids (TS) concentration and a higher volatile solids (VS) content (0.92 g VS/g TS) than that of DF and PC treatments (0.58 to 0.84 g VS/g TS). DF and PC sludge demonstrated a higher biodegradability rate (k1; 0.11 d−1 &lt; k1 &lt; 0.20 d−1) than solids recovered by RBF (0.09 d−1). The retained solids in the SER configuration demonstrated a significantly lower theoretical biochemical methane potential than the parallel configuration, likely due to the presence of smaller particles with a significantly higher ratio of particulate chemical oxygen demand over volatile suspended solids (1.86 to 2.40 g chemical oxygen demand/g volatile suspended solids). These results indicated that the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of liquid and solids from different filter configurations are required to determine design criteria to upgrade or retrofit water resource recovery facilities using an RBF or a DF. Practitioner Points A rotating belt filter (RBF) removed less solids than a drum filter (DF) or a primary clarifier (PC). A series configuration of an RBF with either a DF or PC resulted in an effluent with a lower proportion of slowly biodegradable organic matter than in a parallel configuration. Solids from an RBF, a DF, or a PC had similar theoretical biochemical methane potential. Quantitative physical (including size fractionation), chemical, and biological characterizations of treated wastewater and solids removed by micro‐sieving technologies are required to optimize design criteria of units located downstream of these technologies for further liquid and solids treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36965038</pmid><doi>10.1002/wer.10854</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4704-2884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-7833</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-4303
ispartof Water environment research, 2023-04, Vol.95 (4), p.e10854-n/a
issn 1061-4303
1554-7531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2791381543
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Belt filters
Biodegradability
Biodegradation
Chemical oxygen demand
Clarifiers
Configurations
Design criteria
Drum filters
Effluents
Fractionation
Influents
Methane
micro‐sieving
Organic matter
organic matter recovery
Oxygen
Oxygen requirement
Particulate Matter
primary treatment
Raw wastewater
Resource recovery
Retrofitting
Rotation
Sewage - chemistry
Sludge
Solid suspensions
Suspended particulate matter
Total suspended solids
Volatile solids
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Wastewater
Wastewater composition
Water resources
title Physico‐chemical characteristics and biodegradability of primary effluent and particulate matter removed by microscreens
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A45%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physico%E2%80%90chemical%20characteristics%20and%20biodegradability%20of%20primary%20effluent%20and%20particulate%20matter%20removed%20by%20microscreens&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Alizadeh,%20Sanaz&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e10854&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e10854-n/a&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wer.10854&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791381543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-d6c4a543ecadc4204bc5b26fd9e85330f25f534b9f84e7004d30108ccd5ab5263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2805895914&rft_id=info:pmid/36965038&rfr_iscdi=true