Loading…
Impact of pelvic floor distress on non-invasive urodynamic findings in women
To compare non-invasive urodynamic findings in women with and without pelvic floor distress and to investigate the patient characteristics affecting maximum flow rates. This is a retrospective study including data derived from a prospective cohort study evaluating free uroflowmetry findings in asymp...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2023-05, Vol.284, p.105-109 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fc26801437b58a56e259460030f159ed813c346dfade527031050ff07f10f25b3 |
container_end_page | 109 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology |
container_volume | 284 |
creator | Cetinkaya, Serife Esra Urcun, Merve Toy Seval, Mehmet Murat Varli, Bulut Dokmeci, Fulya |
description | To compare non-invasive urodynamic findings in women with and without pelvic floor distress and to investigate the patient characteristics affecting maximum flow rates.
This is a retrospective study including data derived from a prospective cohort study evaluating free uroflowmetry findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic women with urinary dysfunction attending the gynecology outpatient clinic for routine annual control, infertility, abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic floor dysfunction. Data regarding baseline characteristics, questionnaires, urogynecologic examination findings and free uroflowmetry results were retrieved. Women were grouped according to the Turkish validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20); women who scored 0 or 1 points for each item (“no” or “not at all”) were considered as asymptomatic in terms of pelvic floor dysfunction, and women who scored 2 or more points to any item were accepted as symptomatic. Baseline characteristics, clinical examination findings and free uroflowmetry data were compared among the groups using Student’s-t or Mann-Whitney U tests, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact tests, where appropriate. Correlations and their significance, and patient characteristics affecting Qmax were investigated using the Pearson test. A multiple linear regression model was used to identify independent factors affecting Qmax.
The study population (n = 186) comprised asymptomatic (n = 70, 37.6%) and symptomatic (n = 116, 62.4%) women according to the scores of the PFDI-20. Corrected Qmax, TQmax, Tvv and PVR were found significantly lower in asymptomatic women (p ≤ 0.001). In asymptomatic women, PVR was |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.017 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2791703941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211523001070</els_id><sourcerecordid>2791703941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fc26801437b58a56e259460030f159ed813c346dfade527031050ff07f10f25b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9rGzEQxUVJqd2036AUHXNZRyOttLuXQDBJazDk0pzFWhoFmV3JkdYO_vaRsZNjhwdz-b358wj5BWwBDNTtdoHb-JI2C864WLAiaL6QObQNrxol6ysyZ4JBxQHkjHzPectKCdF9IzOhOqVk287JejXuejPR6OgOh4M31A0xJmp9nhLmTGOgIYbKh0Of_QHpPkV7DP14In2wPrxk6gN9iyOGH-Sr64eMPy_9mjw_Pvxb_q3WT39Wy_t1ZQTAVDnDVcugFs1Gtr1UyGVXq3IbcyA7tC0II2plXW9R8oYJYJI5xxoHzHG5Edfk5jx3l-LrHvOkR58NDkMfMO6z5k0HxdbVUND6jJoUc07o9C75sU9HDUyfctRbfc5Rn3LUrAiaYvt92bDfjGg_TR_BFeDuDGD58-Ax6Ww8BoPWJzSTttH_f8M7JAeE9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791703941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of pelvic floor distress on non-invasive urodynamic findings in women</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Cetinkaya, Serife Esra ; Urcun, Merve Toy ; Seval, Mehmet Murat ; Varli, Bulut ; Dokmeci, Fulya</creator><creatorcontrib>Cetinkaya, Serife Esra ; Urcun, Merve Toy ; Seval, Mehmet Murat ; Varli, Bulut ; Dokmeci, Fulya</creatorcontrib><description>To compare non-invasive urodynamic findings in women with and without pelvic floor distress and to investigate the patient characteristics affecting maximum flow rates.
This is a retrospective study including data derived from a prospective cohort study evaluating free uroflowmetry findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic women with urinary dysfunction attending the gynecology outpatient clinic for routine annual control, infertility, abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic floor dysfunction. Data regarding baseline characteristics, questionnaires, urogynecologic examination findings and free uroflowmetry results were retrieved. Women were grouped according to the Turkish validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20); women who scored 0 or 1 points for each item (“no” or “not at all”) were considered as asymptomatic in terms of pelvic floor dysfunction, and women who scored 2 or more points to any item were accepted as symptomatic. Baseline characteristics, clinical examination findings and free uroflowmetry data were compared among the groups using Student’s-t or Mann-Whitney U tests, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact tests, where appropriate. Correlations and their significance, and patient characteristics affecting Qmax were investigated using the Pearson test. A multiple linear regression model was used to identify independent factors affecting Qmax.
The study population (n = 186) comprised asymptomatic (n = 70, 37.6%) and symptomatic (n = 116, 62.4%) women according to the scores of the PFDI-20. Corrected Qmax, TQmax, Tvv and PVR were found significantly lower in asymptomatic women (p ≤ 0.001). In asymptomatic women, PVR was <100 mL in 98.5%, and <50 mL in 80%. In multivariate linear regression analysis parity, obstructive subscale score of the UDI-6, previous mid-urethral sling surgery and hysterectomy were found to affect Qmax negatively, whereas VV was found to affect Qmax positively.
Although significantly different, overlapping wide ranges of non-invasive urodynamic findings have been observed in women with and without pelvic floor distress in the present study population. Maximum urinary flow rates were significantly affected by patient characteristics such as parity, obstructive symptoms, prior incontinence surgery and hysterectomy. There is need for further larger studies considering all possible factors that may affect voiding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36966588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Female ; Free uroflowmetry ; Humans ; Maximum flow rates ; Non-invasive urodynamics ; Pelvic Floor ; Pelvic floor distress inventory-20 ; Post-void residual urine ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Urinary Incontinence ; Urodynamics</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2023-05, Vol.284, p.105-109</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fc26801437b58a56e259460030f159ed813c346dfade527031050ff07f10f25b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36966588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cetinkaya, Serife Esra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urcun, Merve Toy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seval, Mehmet Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varli, Bulut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokmeci, Fulya</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of pelvic floor distress on non-invasive urodynamic findings in women</title><title>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>To compare non-invasive urodynamic findings in women with and without pelvic floor distress and to investigate the patient characteristics affecting maximum flow rates.
This is a retrospective study including data derived from a prospective cohort study evaluating free uroflowmetry findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic women with urinary dysfunction attending the gynecology outpatient clinic for routine annual control, infertility, abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic floor dysfunction. Data regarding baseline characteristics, questionnaires, urogynecologic examination findings and free uroflowmetry results were retrieved. Women were grouped according to the Turkish validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20); women who scored 0 or 1 points for each item (“no” or “not at all”) were considered as asymptomatic in terms of pelvic floor dysfunction, and women who scored 2 or more points to any item were accepted as symptomatic. Baseline characteristics, clinical examination findings and free uroflowmetry data were compared among the groups using Student’s-t or Mann-Whitney U tests, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact tests, where appropriate. Correlations and their significance, and patient characteristics affecting Qmax were investigated using the Pearson test. A multiple linear regression model was used to identify independent factors affecting Qmax.
The study population (n = 186) comprised asymptomatic (n = 70, 37.6%) and symptomatic (n = 116, 62.4%) women according to the scores of the PFDI-20. Corrected Qmax, TQmax, Tvv and PVR were found significantly lower in asymptomatic women (p ≤ 0.001). In asymptomatic women, PVR was <100 mL in 98.5%, and <50 mL in 80%. In multivariate linear regression analysis parity, obstructive subscale score of the UDI-6, previous mid-urethral sling surgery and hysterectomy were found to affect Qmax negatively, whereas VV was found to affect Qmax positively.
Although significantly different, overlapping wide ranges of non-invasive urodynamic findings have been observed in women with and without pelvic floor distress in the present study population. Maximum urinary flow rates were significantly affected by patient characteristics such as parity, obstructive symptoms, prior incontinence surgery and hysterectomy. There is need for further larger studies considering all possible factors that may affect voiding.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Free uroflowmetry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maximum flow rates</subject><subject>Non-invasive urodynamics</subject><subject>Pelvic Floor</subject><subject>Pelvic floor distress inventory-20</subject><subject>Post-void residual urine</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9rGzEQxUVJqd2036AUHXNZRyOttLuXQDBJazDk0pzFWhoFmV3JkdYO_vaRsZNjhwdz-b358wj5BWwBDNTtdoHb-JI2C864WLAiaL6QObQNrxol6ysyZ4JBxQHkjHzPectKCdF9IzOhOqVk287JejXuejPR6OgOh4M31A0xJmp9nhLmTGOgIYbKh0Of_QHpPkV7DP14In2wPrxk6gN9iyOGH-Sr64eMPy_9mjw_Pvxb_q3WT39Wy_t1ZQTAVDnDVcugFs1Gtr1UyGVXq3IbcyA7tC0II2plXW9R8oYJYJI5xxoHzHG5Edfk5jx3l-LrHvOkR58NDkMfMO6z5k0HxdbVUND6jJoUc07o9C75sU9HDUyfctRbfc5Rn3LUrAiaYvt92bDfjGg_TR_BFeDuDGD58-Ax6Ww8BoPWJzSTttH_f8M7JAeE9w</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Cetinkaya, Serife Esra</creator><creator>Urcun, Merve Toy</creator><creator>Seval, Mehmet Murat</creator><creator>Varli, Bulut</creator><creator>Dokmeci, Fulya</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Impact of pelvic floor distress on non-invasive urodynamic findings in women</title><author>Cetinkaya, Serife Esra ; Urcun, Merve Toy ; Seval, Mehmet Murat ; Varli, Bulut ; Dokmeci, Fulya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fc26801437b58a56e259460030f159ed813c346dfade527031050ff07f10f25b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Free uroflowmetry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maximum flow rates</topic><topic>Non-invasive urodynamics</topic><topic>Pelvic Floor</topic><topic>Pelvic floor distress inventory-20</topic><topic>Post-void residual urine</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cetinkaya, Serife Esra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urcun, Merve Toy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seval, Mehmet Murat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varli, Bulut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokmeci, Fulya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cetinkaya, Serife Esra</au><au>Urcun, Merve Toy</au><au>Seval, Mehmet Murat</au><au>Varli, Bulut</au><au>Dokmeci, Fulya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of pelvic floor distress on non-invasive urodynamic findings in women</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>284</volume><spage>105</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>105-109</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>To compare non-invasive urodynamic findings in women with and without pelvic floor distress and to investigate the patient characteristics affecting maximum flow rates.
This is a retrospective study including data derived from a prospective cohort study evaluating free uroflowmetry findings in asymptomatic and symptomatic women with urinary dysfunction attending the gynecology outpatient clinic for routine annual control, infertility, abnormal uterine bleeding and pelvic floor dysfunction. Data regarding baseline characteristics, questionnaires, urogynecologic examination findings and free uroflowmetry results were retrieved. Women were grouped according to the Turkish validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20); women who scored 0 or 1 points for each item (“no” or “not at all”) were considered as asymptomatic in terms of pelvic floor dysfunction, and women who scored 2 or more points to any item were accepted as symptomatic. Baseline characteristics, clinical examination findings and free uroflowmetry data were compared among the groups using Student’s-t or Mann-Whitney U tests, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact tests, where appropriate. Correlations and their significance, and patient characteristics affecting Qmax were investigated using the Pearson test. A multiple linear regression model was used to identify independent factors affecting Qmax.
The study population (n = 186) comprised asymptomatic (n = 70, 37.6%) and symptomatic (n = 116, 62.4%) women according to the scores of the PFDI-20. Corrected Qmax, TQmax, Tvv and PVR were found significantly lower in asymptomatic women (p ≤ 0.001). In asymptomatic women, PVR was <100 mL in 98.5%, and <50 mL in 80%. In multivariate linear regression analysis parity, obstructive subscale score of the UDI-6, previous mid-urethral sling surgery and hysterectomy were found to affect Qmax negatively, whereas VV was found to affect Qmax positively.
Although significantly different, overlapping wide ranges of non-invasive urodynamic findings have been observed in women with and without pelvic floor distress in the present study population. Maximum urinary flow rates were significantly affected by patient characteristics such as parity, obstructive symptoms, prior incontinence surgery and hysterectomy. There is need for further larger studies considering all possible factors that may affect voiding.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36966588</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.017</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-2115 |
ispartof | European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2023-05, Vol.284, p.105-109 |
issn | 0301-2115 1872-7654 1872-7654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2791703941 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Female Free uroflowmetry Humans Maximum flow rates Non-invasive urodynamics Pelvic Floor Pelvic floor distress inventory-20 Post-void residual urine Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies Urinary Incontinence Urodynamics |
title | Impact of pelvic floor distress on non-invasive urodynamic findings in women |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A33%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20pelvic%20floor%20distress%20on%20non-invasive%20urodynamic%20findings%20in%20women&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Cetinkaya,%20Serife%20Esra&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=284&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=105-109&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791703941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-fc26801437b58a56e259460030f159ed813c346dfade527031050ff07f10f25b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791703941&rft_id=info:pmid/36966588&rfr_iscdi=true |