Loading…
Revised Dual Task Screen is a Valid Measure of Dual Task Performance: Developing a Motor and Cognitive Dual Task Measure with Healthy Female Athletes
Multitasking measures, such as dual task assessments, are particularly useful in detecting subtle deficits that can influence occupational performance after injuries, like sports-related concussion (SRC). In past work, our research team developed and revised a dual task assessment, the Dual Task Scr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Occupational therapy in health care 2023-04, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-15 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-a3766c41c44b83c26d1e222d15eefa3aa729b7db661e6fba03f579be68dd45c83 |
container_end_page | 15 |
container_issue | ahead-of-print |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Occupational therapy in health care |
container_volume | ahead-of-print |
creator | Giessler-Gonzalez, Kalena Tracy, Brian L. Davies, Patricia L. Stephens, Jaclyn A. |
description | Multitasking measures, such as dual task assessments, are particularly useful in detecting subtle deficits that can influence occupational performance after injuries, like sports-related concussion (SRC). In past work, our research team developed and revised a dual task assessment, the Dual Task Screen (DTS). Here, we evaluated nineteen healthy athletes using the revised DTS to address two specific research objectives. First, to replicate pilot study findings and demonstrate that the revised DTS is sensitive to dual task motor costs (i.e. poorer motor performance under dual task conditions, compared to single task conditions). Second, to evaluate if the revised DTS is sensitive to dual task cognitive costs (i.e. poorer cognitive performance under dual task conditions, compared to single task conditions). We confirmed that the revised DTS was sensitive to both dual task motor and cognitive costs; thus it is a valid measure of dual task performance. These positive findings support its prospective, future use by occupational therapists to evaluate multitasking performance after injuries, like SRC, or other injuries and illnesses that elicit deficits affecting optimal occupational performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07380577.2023.2191357 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2795357810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2795357810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-a3766c41c44b83c26d1e222d15eefa3aa729b7db661e6fba03f579be68dd45c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCI4C8ZJOpf-LYYUU1pT9SKxAUtpZj33QMTjzYyVTzILxvM50Z1BWru_nOudL5EHpHyZwSRU6J5IoIKeeMMD5ntKZcyBdoRkVJC05q9RLNtkyxhY7Qcc6_CKGqUuQ1OuKS0JJJMUN_v8HaZ3D4fDQB35n8G3-3CaDHPmODf5rgHb4Fk8cEOLbPsK-Q2pg601v4iM9hDSGufH8_hW7jEBM2vcOLeN_7wa_hWe5Q9uCHJb4CE4blBl9AZwLgs2EZYID8Br1qTcjwdn9P0I-Lz3eLq-Lmy-X14uymsKwsh8JwWVW2pLYsG8UtqxwFxpijAqA13BjJ6ka6pqooVG1jCG-FrBuolHOlsIqfoA-73lWKf0bIg-58thCC6SGOWTNZi2lWRcmEih1qU8w5QatXyXcmbTQlemtEH4zorRG9NzLl3u9fjE0H7l_qoGACPu0A3z_t-RBTcHowmxBTm6Z5fdb8_z8eAacEm1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2795357810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revised Dual Task Screen is a Valid Measure of Dual Task Performance: Developing a Motor and Cognitive Dual Task Measure with Healthy Female Athletes</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Giessler-Gonzalez, Kalena ; Tracy, Brian L. ; Davies, Patricia L. ; Stephens, Jaclyn A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giessler-Gonzalez, Kalena ; Tracy, Brian L. ; Davies, Patricia L. ; Stephens, Jaclyn A.</creatorcontrib><description>Multitasking measures, such as dual task assessments, are particularly useful in detecting subtle deficits that can influence occupational performance after injuries, like sports-related concussion (SRC). In past work, our research team developed and revised a dual task assessment, the Dual Task Screen (DTS). Here, we evaluated nineteen healthy athletes using the revised DTS to address two specific research objectives. First, to replicate pilot study findings and demonstrate that the revised DTS is sensitive to dual task motor costs (i.e. poorer motor performance under dual task conditions, compared to single task conditions). Second, to evaluate if the revised DTS is sensitive to dual task cognitive costs (i.e. poorer cognitive performance under dual task conditions, compared to single task conditions). We confirmed that the revised DTS was sensitive to both dual task motor and cognitive costs; thus it is a valid measure of dual task performance. These positive findings support its prospective, future use by occupational therapists to evaluate multitasking performance after injuries, like SRC, or other injuries and illnesses that elicit deficits affecting optimal occupational performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-0577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-3098</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07380577.2023.2191357</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37014275</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Athletes ; dual task assessment ; measure development ; occupational therapy ; sports-related concussion</subject><ispartof>Occupational therapy in health care, 2023-04, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-a3766c41c44b83c26d1e222d15eefa3aa729b7db661e6fba03f579be68dd45c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0189-6809 ; 0000-0003-2662-0104 ; 0000-0002-6363-7928</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014275$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giessler-Gonzalez, Kalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tracy, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Patricia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Jaclyn A.</creatorcontrib><title>Revised Dual Task Screen is a Valid Measure of Dual Task Performance: Developing a Motor and Cognitive Dual Task Measure with Healthy Female Athletes</title><title>Occupational therapy in health care</title><addtitle>Occup Ther Health Care</addtitle><description>Multitasking measures, such as dual task assessments, are particularly useful in detecting subtle deficits that can influence occupational performance after injuries, like sports-related concussion (SRC). In past work, our research team developed and revised a dual task assessment, the Dual Task Screen (DTS). Here, we evaluated nineteen healthy athletes using the revised DTS to address two specific research objectives. First, to replicate pilot study findings and demonstrate that the revised DTS is sensitive to dual task motor costs (i.e. poorer motor performance under dual task conditions, compared to single task conditions). Second, to evaluate if the revised DTS is sensitive to dual task cognitive costs (i.e. poorer cognitive performance under dual task conditions, compared to single task conditions). We confirmed that the revised DTS was sensitive to both dual task motor and cognitive costs; thus it is a valid measure of dual task performance. These positive findings support its prospective, future use by occupational therapists to evaluate multitasking performance after injuries, like SRC, or other injuries and illnesses that elicit deficits affecting optimal occupational performance.</description><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>dual task assessment</subject><subject>measure development</subject><subject>occupational therapy</subject><subject>sports-related concussion</subject><issn>0738-0577</issn><issn>1541-3098</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotPCI4C8ZJOpf-LYYUU1pT9SKxAUtpZj33QMTjzYyVTzILxvM50Z1BWru_nOudL5EHpHyZwSRU6J5IoIKeeMMD5ntKZcyBdoRkVJC05q9RLNtkyxhY7Qcc6_CKGqUuQ1OuKS0JJJMUN_v8HaZ3D4fDQB35n8G3-3CaDHPmODf5rgHb4Fk8cEOLbPsK-Q2pg601v4iM9hDSGufH8_hW7jEBM2vcOLeN_7wa_hWe5Q9uCHJb4CE4blBl9AZwLgs2EZYID8Br1qTcjwdn9P0I-Lz3eLq-Lmy-X14uymsKwsh8JwWVW2pLYsG8UtqxwFxpijAqA13BjJ6ka6pqooVG1jCG-FrBuolHOlsIqfoA-73lWKf0bIg-58thCC6SGOWTNZi2lWRcmEih1qU8w5QatXyXcmbTQlemtEH4zorRG9NzLl3u9fjE0H7l_qoGACPu0A3z_t-RBTcHowmxBTm6Z5fdb8_z8eAacEm1A</recordid><startdate>20230404</startdate><enddate>20230404</enddate><creator>Giessler-Gonzalez, Kalena</creator><creator>Tracy, Brian L.</creator><creator>Davies, Patricia L.</creator><creator>Stephens, Jaclyn A.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-6809</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-0104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-7928</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230404</creationdate><title>Revised Dual Task Screen is a Valid Measure of Dual Task Performance: Developing a Motor and Cognitive Dual Task Measure with Healthy Female Athletes</title><author>Giessler-Gonzalez, Kalena ; Tracy, Brian L. ; Davies, Patricia L. ; Stephens, Jaclyn A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-a3766c41c44b83c26d1e222d15eefa3aa729b7db661e6fba03f579be68dd45c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>dual task assessment</topic><topic>measure development</topic><topic>occupational therapy</topic><topic>sports-related concussion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giessler-Gonzalez, Kalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tracy, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Patricia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Jaclyn A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Occupational therapy in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giessler-Gonzalez, Kalena</au><au>Tracy, Brian L.</au><au>Davies, Patricia L.</au><au>Stephens, Jaclyn A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revised Dual Task Screen is a Valid Measure of Dual Task Performance: Developing a Motor and Cognitive Dual Task Measure with Healthy Female Athletes</atitle><jtitle>Occupational therapy in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Occup Ther Health Care</addtitle><date>2023-04-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>ahead-of-print</volume><issue>ahead-of-print</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>0738-0577</issn><eissn>1541-3098</eissn><abstract>Multitasking measures, such as dual task assessments, are particularly useful in detecting subtle deficits that can influence occupational performance after injuries, like sports-related concussion (SRC). In past work, our research team developed and revised a dual task assessment, the Dual Task Screen (DTS). Here, we evaluated nineteen healthy athletes using the revised DTS to address two specific research objectives. First, to replicate pilot study findings and demonstrate that the revised DTS is sensitive to dual task motor costs (i.e. poorer motor performance under dual task conditions, compared to single task conditions). Second, to evaluate if the revised DTS is sensitive to dual task cognitive costs (i.e. poorer cognitive performance under dual task conditions, compared to single task conditions). We confirmed that the revised DTS was sensitive to both dual task motor and cognitive costs; thus it is a valid measure of dual task performance. These positive findings support its prospective, future use by occupational therapists to evaluate multitasking performance after injuries, like SRC, or other injuries and illnesses that elicit deficits affecting optimal occupational performance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>37014275</pmid><doi>10.1080/07380577.2023.2191357</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0189-6809</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-0104</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-7928</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0738-0577 |
ispartof | Occupational therapy in health care, 2023-04, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-15 |
issn | 0738-0577 1541-3098 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2795357810 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Athletes dual task assessment measure development occupational therapy sports-related concussion |
title | Revised Dual Task Screen is a Valid Measure of Dual Task Performance: Developing a Motor and Cognitive Dual Task Measure with Healthy Female Athletes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revised%20Dual%20Task%20Screen%20is%20a%20Valid%20Measure%20of%20Dual%20Task%20Performance:%20Developing%20a%20Motor%20and%20Cognitive%20Dual%20Task%20Measure%20with%20Healthy%20Female%20Athletes&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20therapy%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Giessler-Gonzalez,%20Kalena&rft.date=2023-04-04&rft.volume=ahead-of-print&rft.issue=ahead-of-print&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=0738-0577&rft.eissn=1541-3098&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07380577.2023.2191357&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2795357810%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-a3766c41c44b83c26d1e222d15eefa3aa729b7db661e6fba03f579be68dd45c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2795357810&rft_id=info:pmid/37014275&rfr_iscdi=true |