Loading…

Summary of a Large- and Small-Scale Unreinforced Masonry Infill Test Program

A five-year, large- and small-scale, static and dynamic experimental research program, in which more than 700 tests were conducted, has demonstrated that unreinforced masonry infills are more ductile and resist lateral loads more effectively than anticipated by conventional code procedures. The test...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2003-12, Vol.129 (12), p.1667-1675
Main Authors: Henderson, R. C, Fricke, K. E, Jones, W. D, Beavers, J. E, Bennett, R. M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-61e5efc0c1a1aca7c2a7da94837178d3b089ddd2bd4d447aead79a257f922c233
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-61e5efc0c1a1aca7c2a7da94837178d3b089ddd2bd4d447aead79a257f922c233
container_end_page 1675
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1667
container_title Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 129
creator Henderson, R. C
Fricke, K. E
Jones, W. D
Beavers, J. E
Bennett, R. M
description A five-year, large- and small-scale, static and dynamic experimental research program, in which more than 700 tests were conducted, has demonstrated that unreinforced masonry infills are more ductile and resist lateral loads more effectively than anticipated by conventional code procedures. The tests were conducted both in the laboratory and on existing structures at the Department of Energy's Y-12 National Security Complex. The experimental data indicate that the combination of a steel frame and infill material efficiently resists lateral loads-the infilling provides significant lateral stiffness while the surrounding frame adds ductility and confinement to the overall system. The results from approximately 25 moderate- and full-scale tests on infills showed that with simulated seismic loads the frames confined the masonry, and the load-carrying capacity of the infill was considerably above the load that caused initial cracking. This finding was a significant departure from classical code approaches that assumed first cracking to be failure of an unreinforced masonry wall. The experimental program, performed for the U.S. Department of Energy, consisted of the following large-scale tests on infills: in situ airbag pressure testing, shake-table tests, and the application of quasistatic in-plane and out-of-plane drift loads. In situ and laboratory constitutive property tests were also conducted. This paper provides a summary of the overall experimental methodology and results.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1667)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27978072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27978072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-61e5efc0c1a1aca7c2a7da94837178d3b089ddd2bd4d447aead79a257f922c233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD16hdhHwI4kTVlSl0KLwkNJKiI01tZ0qVR5gNwv-HqcFtixGo5GO73gOQmNKriiJ6fVokk9nYyI4D9IwjEaMED6mLL2hbETjWIyP0ICmIQ-ikL4do8EfeYrOnNsSQkREkwHK8q6uwX7htsCAM7AbE2BoNM5rqKogV1AZvGqsKZuitcpo_ASubfyDRVOUVYWXxu3wq203FupzdFJA5czFTx-i1f1sOZ0H2cvDYjrJAuBJsgtiaiJTKKIoUFAgFAOhIQ0TLqhINF-TJNVas7UOdRgKMKBFCiwSRcqYYpwP0eUh98O2n53_gKxLp0xVQWPazkkmUpEQwTx4ewCVbZ2zppAftuzPlZTI3qOUvUfZ25G9Hdl7lN6jL9l79BHvhwjwG-S27WzjT5OP-ez5bu41epbsmy_Pk_3wm_5f-DfCSX9f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27978072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Summary of a Large- and Small-Scale Unreinforced Masonry Infill Test Program</title><source>ASCE_美国土木工程师学会期刊</source><creator>Henderson, R. C ; Fricke, K. E ; Jones, W. D ; Beavers, J. E ; Bennett, R. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Henderson, R. C ; Fricke, K. E ; Jones, W. D ; Beavers, J. E ; Bennett, R. M</creatorcontrib><description>A five-year, large- and small-scale, static and dynamic experimental research program, in which more than 700 tests were conducted, has demonstrated that unreinforced masonry infills are more ductile and resist lateral loads more effectively than anticipated by conventional code procedures. The tests were conducted both in the laboratory and on existing structures at the Department of Energy's Y-12 National Security Complex. The experimental data indicate that the combination of a steel frame and infill material efficiently resists lateral loads-the infilling provides significant lateral stiffness while the surrounding frame adds ductility and confinement to the overall system. The results from approximately 25 moderate- and full-scale tests on infills showed that with simulated seismic loads the frames confined the masonry, and the load-carrying capacity of the infill was considerably above the load that caused initial cracking. This finding was a significant departure from classical code approaches that assumed first cracking to be failure of an unreinforced masonry wall. The experimental program, performed for the U.S. Department of Energy, consisted of the following large-scale tests on infills: in situ airbag pressure testing, shake-table tests, and the application of quasistatic in-plane and out-of-plane drift loads. In situ and laboratory constitutive property tests were also conducted. This paper provides a summary of the overall experimental methodology and results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-541X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1667)</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2003-12, Vol.129 (12), p.1667-1675</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-61e5efc0c1a1aca7c2a7da94837178d3b089ddd2bd4d447aead79a257f922c233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-61e5efc0c1a1aca7c2a7da94837178d3b089ddd2bd4d447aead79a257f922c233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1667)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1667)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henderson, R. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fricke, K. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, W. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beavers, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, R. M</creatorcontrib><title>Summary of a Large- and Small-Scale Unreinforced Masonry Infill Test Program</title><title>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>A five-year, large- and small-scale, static and dynamic experimental research program, in which more than 700 tests were conducted, has demonstrated that unreinforced masonry infills are more ductile and resist lateral loads more effectively than anticipated by conventional code procedures. The tests were conducted both in the laboratory and on existing structures at the Department of Energy's Y-12 National Security Complex. The experimental data indicate that the combination of a steel frame and infill material efficiently resists lateral loads-the infilling provides significant lateral stiffness while the surrounding frame adds ductility and confinement to the overall system. The results from approximately 25 moderate- and full-scale tests on infills showed that with simulated seismic loads the frames confined the masonry, and the load-carrying capacity of the infill was considerably above the load that caused initial cracking. This finding was a significant departure from classical code approaches that assumed first cracking to be failure of an unreinforced masonry wall. The experimental program, performed for the U.S. Department of Energy, consisted of the following large-scale tests on infills: in situ airbag pressure testing, shake-table tests, and the application of quasistatic in-plane and out-of-plane drift loads. In situ and laboratory constitutive property tests were also conducted. This paper provides a summary of the overall experimental methodology and results.</description><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9445</issn><issn>1943-541X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD16hdhHwI4kTVlSl0KLwkNJKiI01tZ0qVR5gNwv-HqcFtixGo5GO73gOQmNKriiJ6fVokk9nYyI4D9IwjEaMED6mLL2hbETjWIyP0ICmIQ-ikL4do8EfeYrOnNsSQkREkwHK8q6uwX7htsCAM7AbE2BoNM5rqKogV1AZvGqsKZuitcpo_ASubfyDRVOUVYWXxu3wq203FupzdFJA5czFTx-i1f1sOZ0H2cvDYjrJAuBJsgtiaiJTKKIoUFAgFAOhIQ0TLqhINF-TJNVas7UOdRgKMKBFCiwSRcqYYpwP0eUh98O2n53_gKxLp0xVQWPazkkmUpEQwTx4ewCVbZ2zppAftuzPlZTI3qOUvUfZ25G9Hdl7lN6jL9l79BHvhwjwG-S27WzjT5OP-ez5bu41epbsmy_Pk_3wm_5f-DfCSX9f</recordid><startdate>200312</startdate><enddate>200312</enddate><creator>Henderson, R. C</creator><creator>Fricke, K. E</creator><creator>Jones, W. D</creator><creator>Beavers, J. E</creator><creator>Bennett, R. M</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200312</creationdate><title>Summary of a Large- and Small-Scale Unreinforced Masonry Infill Test Program</title><author>Henderson, R. C ; Fricke, K. E ; Jones, W. D ; Beavers, J. E ; Bennett, R. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-61e5efc0c1a1aca7c2a7da94837178d3b089ddd2bd4d447aead79a257f922c233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henderson, R. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fricke, K. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, W. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beavers, J. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, R. M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henderson, R. C</au><au>Fricke, K. E</au><au>Jones, W. D</au><au>Beavers, J. E</au><au>Bennett, R. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Summary of a Large- and Small-Scale Unreinforced Masonry Infill Test Program</atitle><jtitle>Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2003-12</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1667</spage><epage>1675</epage><pages>1667-1675</pages><issn>0733-9445</issn><eissn>1943-541X</eissn><abstract>A five-year, large- and small-scale, static and dynamic experimental research program, in which more than 700 tests were conducted, has demonstrated that unreinforced masonry infills are more ductile and resist lateral loads more effectively than anticipated by conventional code procedures. The tests were conducted both in the laboratory and on existing structures at the Department of Energy's Y-12 National Security Complex. The experimental data indicate that the combination of a steel frame and infill material efficiently resists lateral loads-the infilling provides significant lateral stiffness while the surrounding frame adds ductility and confinement to the overall system. The results from approximately 25 moderate- and full-scale tests on infills showed that with simulated seismic loads the frames confined the masonry, and the load-carrying capacity of the infill was considerably above the load that caused initial cracking. This finding was a significant departure from classical code approaches that assumed first cracking to be failure of an unreinforced masonry wall. The experimental program, performed for the U.S. Department of Energy, consisted of the following large-scale tests on infills: in situ airbag pressure testing, shake-table tests, and the application of quasistatic in-plane and out-of-plane drift loads. In situ and laboratory constitutive property tests were also conducted. This paper provides a summary of the overall experimental methodology and results.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1667)</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9445
ispartof Journal of structural engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2003-12, Vol.129 (12), p.1667-1675
issn 0733-9445
1943-541X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27978072
source ASCE_美国土木工程师学会期刊
subjects TECHNICAL PAPERS
title Summary of a Large- and Small-Scale Unreinforced Masonry Infill Test Program
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A22%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Summary%20of%20a%20Large-%20and%20Small-Scale%20Unreinforced%20Masonry%20Infill%20Test%20Program&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20structural%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Henderson,%20R.%20C&rft.date=2003-12&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1667&rft.epage=1675&rft.pages=1667-1675&rft.issn=0733-9445&rft.eissn=1943-541X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1667)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27978072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a388t-61e5efc0c1a1aca7c2a7da94837178d3b089ddd2bd4d447aead79a257f922c233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27978072&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true